The most unnerving part for me is the hubris of the claim. Conway is bluntly saying 'We're telling you what is real now'
The most unnerving part for me is the hubris of the claim. Conway is bluntly saying 'We're telling you what is real now'
The most unnerving part is that there are people who will accept the lies.
The commonest example is the value of a $5 bill. It's not in the paper or the ink, it's in our shared belief that $5 is worth, well, five dollars. This is as much a fact as any other.
It may be uncomfortable in a forum where an objective epistemology is held in such high regard, but there's an easy fix. Just think of it a bit meta.
1) There is some fact about the world.
2) Access to this fact is restricted, either because of insufficient access to the past or by way of inherent ambiguity.
3) What people believe about the fact is also factual. That is, we can find out what those beliefs are, and we can do so in the present and experimentally.
4) This second-order fact (beliefs about the first fact) serves the same role in societal discourse as the original fact would, if it were current and accepted.
5) "Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not"
The most unnerving part is that there are people who will accept the lies.
Are there? It doesn't seem to me like this particular lie has had any traction, but I might not know what the hinterlands think.
Reminds you of some other countries and regimes, doesn't it?
Are there? It doesn't seem to me like this particular lie has had any traction, but I might not know what the hinterlands think.
Semantics - bad ones but that's all it is, I think. What she seemed to be doing was poking fun at the media by saying they each had their own facts. "Well let's see our facts compared with yours because yours have been wrong."
That's my take on it.
I don't mind that these people are a bit (or a lot) clumsy with their speaking (if that's all it is). Who needs another forked tongue slick talking politician that lies and gets nothing done? Gawd I hope that's all this is anyways.
I read she is the first woman to successfully (win) run a presidential campaign. Any credit for that?
The most unnerving part is that there are people who will accept the lies.
I did see some analysis of attendance and TV viewers as a proportion of the overall population (which has seen steady increases), which was interesting, but I can't for the life of me find where it was.
It does indeed. In fact, the new most unnerving part for me is thinking 'It can't happen here'.
Anecdotal - In my local coffee shop, the regulars tend to be Trump supporters. On Sunday morning, overhead one guy saying that "It was the biggest inaugural ever, they just didn't take the photos at the right time." Lot's of nodding of heads and "damn media". And this isn't the hinterlands, I live in suburban CT.
What are you insane? Trump keeps feeding the public a crap sandwich and you're saying mm mmmmm good?
Yes, politicians lie. But everyone does once in a while. .
It can happen anywhere. Normally I'd trust the American democratic system to be resilient enough to handle this, but with the checks and balances torn down by putting everything up for popular vote, I'm not so sure.
According to the late B.B. King, even Lucille lies a little.
Even Vulcanslieexaggerate.
Vulcans don't really know dick about logic. They lie a lot.