• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I don't think that all extreme sportsmen are quacks and morons.
Click to expand...

I never said they were. Are you seriously equating your tall tales of a fictional diet with an extreme sort?

Extreme lying possibly.

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I think that in future most of real scientist who want to achieve the great results in a short period of time will go this way.

It is not good to be a professor, to work 40 -50 years, to get very good money and big respect.

And in the end of his life it becomes clear for the most of those people that they are the "scientist zeros"
Click to expand...

No, science has spent a few hundred years moving AWAY from the crackpot methodology you claim to be following; you get better, more reliable and more objective results when the experiment and the subject are different people.

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Do not lie.
The cyanide was put only in the cakes of Rasputin after they were cooked..
In the cakes of the other guests was not cyanide of course.
Click to expand...

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
If I have developed the habit of eating only at the Seventh Day, when I need it; why not develop the habit of regular consumption is very small - not lethal dose of potassium cyanide, which would develop immunity to the lethal doses?

To Rasputin was given a 3-4 lethal dose of potassium cyanide and Rasputin did not die from it just because he trained himself against this situation.
Click to expand...

I did a bit of research into cyanide immunity. It turns out the cakes already contained one of the compounds believed to help treat cyanide poisoning!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_poisoning#Antidote

Glucose: Evidence from animal experiments suggests that coadministration of glucose protects against cobalt toxicity associated with the antidote agent dicobalt edetate. For this reason, glucose is often administered alongside this agent (e.g. in the formulation 'Kelocyanor').
It has also been anecdotally suggested that glucose is itself an effective counteragent to cyanide, reacting with it to form less toxic compounds that can be eliminated by the body. One theory on the apparent immunity of Grigory Rasputin to cyanide was that his killers put the poison in sweet pastries and madeira wine, both of which are rich in sugar; thus, Rasputin would have been administered the poison together with massive quantities of antidote. One study found a reduction in cyanide toxicity in mice when the cyanide was first mixed with glucose.[24] However, as yet glucose on its own is not an officially acknowledged antidote to cyanide poisoning.
Click to expand...

As I've said before, there was nothing special about Rasputin. His assassins were just inept.

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
You mix the historical facts and movie fantasy.
Click to expand...

It seems appropriate in a thread started by a proven liar who keeps making up a fake "diet" that we all know he isn't really following.

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Eat 50 grams of the raw meat.
Nothing bad will happen to you.
This way you will be freed from intolerable phobia to salmonella
Click to expand...

I've had food poisoning before. I'm not going to deliberately inflict it upon myself again to "test" a fake theory from a habitual liar.
 
Last edited:
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
You are right.
It is much better when there is somebody who can check me in my great experiment.
I am open to everybody.
You can come to me and check me too.
Only because nobody still does not want to check me I have to check me myself.
Click to expand...

That's why I graphed your dietary claims and found weight fluctuations are are not possible given your claimed food intake:

pubchart



Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I am absolutely sure that if we combine in one person the ill man with specific disease, the scientist and the expert in this disease model and the model for experimentation; the probability of getting a brilliant and unexpected results will very much increase.
Click to expand...

There are, quite literally, HUNDREDS OF YEARS of research saying otherwise. Who should I believe, hundreds of years of research, or one lone guy who flagrantly lies about a fictional diet even HE admits he isn't following.

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
From one side you don't believe that has really achieved a great ability to eat only in the 7th day.
Click to expand...

See the graph above. I don't "believe" anything. The weight fluctuations you've claimed are not possible with the food intake you report.
 
abaddon said:
Nope. Your own self reported wild weight variations are in themselves sufficient to demonstrate that you are either telling porkies or committing slow suicide.


Nope, you are not by your own admission. You claimed to have had hernia surgery. You claimed that you abandoned your diet because of it. Your diet proposal is clearly useless by your own admission.


Nor do you. If you really believed it, your post surgery diet would not have changed. You stated that that you resumed a normal diet post surgery. At some level, you clearly know your diet is deleterious.

Logic? Nope. Evidence. We know that your diet will mess anyone up thanks to science.

It deserves no attention. As an idea it is utterly stupid.

You are dodging bullets. Eventually, you will get caught out. For what it's worth, I have been 6 days with no food more than once. Even then raw chicken was not remotely an option regardless that I was hungry. If you are willing to gobble raw chicken after six days of fasting, you clearly have some other medical issue going on which is either undiagnosed or you are concealing.
Click to expand...
All those interesting questions agree to discuss in this thread - special for this sort of questions:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286661&page=87
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
I believe in science.

You're choosing to believe a fairytale about a very smelly super monk.
Click to expand...

It is a very stupid way - to believe in science or in "a very smelly super monk" without experiment on yourself.

In our chaotic world almost you can't trust to almost anyone or anything except your own experiences on yourself.
 
Craig4 said:
I'm not learning Hebrew and there's nothing you can do about it.
Click to expand...
I believe that in nearest future most people will return to GOD in clerical or secular form.
In this case they will surely teach their kids their God Resurrected Language.

My advise - to teach your kids God Resurrected Language if you believe in God.
 
halleyscomet said:
I never said they were. Are you seriously equating your tall tales of a fictional diet with an extreme sort?

Extreme lying possibly.



No, science has spent a few hundred years moving AWAY from the crackpot methodology you claim to be following; you get better, more reliable and more objective results when the experiment and the subject are different people.





I did a bit of research into cyanide immunity. It turns out the cakes already contained one of the compounds believed to help treat cyanide poisoning!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_poisoning#Antidote



As I've said before, there was nothing special about Rasputin. His assassins were just inept.



It seems appropriate in a thread started by a proven liar who keeps making up a fake "diet" that we all know he isn't really following.



I've had food poisoning before. I'm not going to deliberately inflict it upon myself again to "test" a fake theory from a habitual liar.
Click to expand...

I am ready to discuss this interesting question in this my thread:http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286661&page=87
 
halleyscomet said:
That's why I graphed your dietary claims and found weight fluctuations are are not possible given your claimed food intake:

[qimg]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HTj-urH-vbTYMzVuIchtSQTY9f9bcn50hqoxQ5G7sac/pubchart?oid=467213554&format=image[/qimg]




There are, quite literally, HUNDREDS OF YEARS of research saying otherwise. Who should I believe, hundreds of years of research, or one lone guy who flagrantly lies about a fictional diet even HE admits he isn't following.



See the graph above. I don't "believe" anything. The weight fluctuations you've claimed are not possible with the food intake you report.
Click to expand...

We already discuss this question in this my thread:http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=286661&page=87
 
halleyscomet said:
I'm still waiting for a good reason to think Hebrew is somehow the resurrected original tongue, seeing as how it has absolutely nothing in it to suggest it is the Language of the Birds.
Click to expand...
I explained many times that it is much more correctly to rename so called "Hebrew" on for example: "The language of Judah Tribe that was resurrected in the begining of the 20th century" - "Resurrected Judahit" - " Book of Book Resurrected Language" - "God Book Resurrected Language" - "God Resurrected Language".

All those terms are much more correct for the name of the Language of Israel People than the word: "Hebrew".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom