Mycroft
High Priest of Ed
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2003
- Messages
- 20,501
I'm looking forward to seeing your reasoning on this.Has anybody considered that "if" Putin was responsible for meddling in US elections he is justified in doing so?
I'm looking forward to seeing your reasoning on this.Has anybody considered that "if" Putin was responsible for meddling in US elections he is justified in doing so?
A couple different ways.Justified how?
I love the denial.
Some of the alleged tactics attributed to Putin were propaganda (Fake news for example) while other tactics were less sinister.Of course. But it probably depends on what you mean, exactly.
I think espionage and propaganda are legitimate tools of statecraft, and that nations are entitled to use them to the best of their ability, whenever they believe it suits their purpose. In that sense, yes, Putin is absolutely justified.
On the other hand, it's debatable whether a specific instance of using these tools makes strategic sense, whether it offers reasonable tradeoffs, and whether it contradicts other agreements or expectations. In that sense, Putin's justification is debateable.
I just want to know who I should thank for post-election record high stock market, Trump or Putin?
As long as you remember your choice when the market crashes and you have to pay for superfund cleanup of contaminated sites caused by deregulation, either one.
The 64-year-old Tillerson, a lifetime Exxon employee, came up through the ranks by managing the company's Russia account.
In fact, his close relationship with Russia is one of the major reasons Tillerson was selected to succeed Lee Raymond as CEO of Exxon (XOM) in 2006, according to Steve Coll's book "Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power."
Once he became CEO, Exxon bet billions on Russia's vast but notoriously-elusive oil resources through a bold partnership with Russian oil giant Rosneft. Putin himself attended the 2011 signing ceremony for the deal with Rosneft, which is majority owned by Moscow.
On Tuesday, Donald Trump tapped ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson to be his secretary of state. And one eyebrow-raising aspect of this pick is that Exxon has billions of dollars at stake in one of the biggest foreign policy decisions Trump will consider over the next few years — whether to maintain sanctions on Russia.
Exxon, the world’s largest oil company, has long had its eye on Russia’s vast oil and gas deposits. Between 2011 and 2013, Exxon signed a series of deals with the Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft to explore the Black Sea, develop shale resources in western Siberia, and — most importantly — drill for oil in the Arctic, one of the biggest untapped fossil fuel resources left in the world.
For Exxon, which famously missed out on the massive US fracking boom, these deals were crucial for the company’s future. “Arctic oil in particular would’ve been a game changer for Exxon,” says Fadel Gheit, an oil analyst at Oppenheimer & Co. It was supposed to be a decades-long investment worth many billions.
But Exxon’s activities ground to a halt in 2014, after the Obama administration slapped sanctions on Russia’s oil industry over Russian incursions into Ukraine. Despite having just made a landmark oil discovery in the Kara Sea, Exxon was forced to stop work, and Arctic exploration faded....
But everything hit a snag in 2014 after Russian forces moved into Ukraine and annexed Crimea. In response, the Obama administration put in place US sanctions on Russia’s oil and gas industry that forbid technology transfers and told Exxon it was to halt all offshore drilling work with Rosneft by the end of September.
The timing was brutal for Exxon: The company was in the process of successfully drilling its first well in Block 1 of the Kara Sea — a discovery worth an estimated 750 million barrels of oil. Igor Sechin, the CEO of Rosneft and a close Putin ally, had christened the field “Pobeda,” or Victory....
Russia’s economy minister has been charged with extorting a $2m (£1.6m) bribe to approve a state oil takeover, making him the highest-ranking official to face prosecution since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Alexei Ulyukayev’s arrest has been championed by pro-Kremlin politicians and state television as a victory in the fight against corruption, but the case threatens to expose vulnerabilities in Vladimir Putin's inner circle.
Mr Ulyukayev's ministry had been overseeing a sale of state assets when investigators said he took a bribe on 14 November for approving a $5bn (£4bn) bid by Rosneft, Russia's biggest oil company, to purchase a majority stake in oil producer Bashneft.
Anger?I love how people have no issues *********** over the populace as long as they line their own pockets. No *********** wonder they voted for Trump. Another man that will **** on anyone and anything as long as it puts money in his pockets. He's made it clear that he'll whore out the U.S. as long as Trump industries makes money.
Classy.
More accurately phrased as misplaced anger.Anger?
I just want to know who I should thank for post-election record high stock market, Trump or Putin?
Obama's still in office, yes?
I just also happen to really enjoy the Glorious Putin Does Everything meme.
Yeah, in the 80s we were super-concerned about Russian hacking. It all makes perfect sense now when Romney complained that we don't have as many ships and planes, not to mention cavalry and bayonets, as the good ol' days.
They might, but if they do, they should take their Russia back, too. I'm guessing Russia might have done a thing or two since the 2012 US election that might warrant re-assessing Russia's level of threat.So... do the 80's still want their foreign policy back?
Anger?
I believe that's the second stage of grief.