Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Big Dog said:
sticking to that silly argument the day after Hillary lost?

Can't say I am surprised, the denial in the Hillary camp has been legion today.

It is "misinformation" that Hillary was a terrible candidate who ran a terrible campaign.

Whatever you say.
Click to expand...

Well, spreading the claim is spreading misinformation, and believing that claim is believing misinformation based on ignorance.

After your days long attempt to claim Clinton was an alcoholic based on evidence that was so flimsy you would also have been one when that logic was applied to you, you must be aware of the constant stream of misinformation being put out against Clinton.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
I see you've already chosen to continue to live in your propagandized fantasy world instead of reflecting at least for a second why you could have been so remarkably wrong the whole time. Humble pie n' stuff. Bizarre, but your choice. Enjoy!
Click to expand...

Oh I'm enjoying myself. I'm laughing my head off at the stupidity of the US electorate. As you are as the Putin-Trump bromance blossoms.

I made a prediction about your behaviour when Putin triumphs in Ukraine and Syria. Let's see if I'm wrong.
 
Argumemnon said:
Argument from popularity.

It's still a stupid decision. Are you really arguing that a popular decision is smart by default?

That would be a stupid argument, Dog.
Click to expand...
Actually, Clinton got more of the popular vote than Trump, so it wouldn't be argument by popularity.
 
The Big Dog said:
I told myself that I was not going to argue on the internet today with enraged Hillary fans, so.

Have a good night!
Click to expand...

That's fine, because I'm far from being a Hillary fan. You just can't imagine that someone may dislike Trump and not like Hillary.

Of course this is a cop out from you. You simply have no counter to my argument and are looking desperately for a reason to avoid admitting it.
 
Hillary Clinton may have been the last time a party takes a chance on a legacy candidate. The legacy is the danger. Twenty-five years of detritus in the modern political milieu is too much.

The GOP played right into their hands but they still couldn't polish the turd that was Clinton's history sufficiently to defeat the most despicable maverick of a candidate this side of George Wallace. Trump and the alt-right handlers followed the old axiom, K.I.S.S. and it was an easier sell than explaining away the nuances of four hundred complex and confusing deals, compromises, decisions.

She's done. The phake conservatives can now stop pretending to support the right wing and get back on course. They got what they wanted, the worst possible leadership for the USA. I mean you still get your corporatist war-mongering federal government, but now you get your racism and bigotry, too. 4Chan and Anonymous will be attacking the Republicans starting in about 48 hours.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Hillary Clinton may have been the last time a party takes a chance on a legacy candidate. The legacy is the danger. Twenty-five years of detritus in the modern political milieu is too much.

The GOP played right into their hands but they still couldn't polish the turd that was Clinton's history sufficiently to defeat the most despicable maverick of a candidate this side of George Wallace. Trump and the alt-right handlers followed the old axiom, K.I.S.S. and it was an easier sell than explaining away the nuances of four hundred complex and confusing deals, compromises, decisions.

She's done. The phake conservatives can now stop pretending to support the right wing and get back on course. They got what they wanted, the worst possible leadership for the USA. I mean you still get your corporatist war-mongering federal government, but now you get your racism and bigotry, too. 4Chan and Anonymous will be attacking the Republicans starting in about 48 hours.
Click to expand...


Good morning Foolmewunz! Still not sick of playing the knowitall? After just having been SOOOOOOOO wrong? Thin ice, but happy skating.

Edited by Locknar: 
Edited, breach of rule 0 - do not alter member names.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Childlike Empress said:
Good morning Foolmewunz! Still not sick of playing the knowitall? After just having been SOOOOOOOO wrong? Thin ice, but happy skating.
Edited by Locknar: 
Edited to correct member name.
Click to expand...

In a game where there's no winner, making it into a zero sum equation is difficult. I'm not playing at know-it-all. I look forward to your continued support for The Trump. I predict it will be a very short career now that the desired result has been achieved.

You had, at one point, the single coherent argument against Clinton. You got lost along the way. But if you think the Clinton adventures were murderous, wait'll you see what Flynn and Newt get into.

Anyhow, this thread, as you note, can be closed. She's done. Either of them, at 70, would've been finished after a loss; it's Hillary who did so, so she's done.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wareyin said:
I was going to point out that some people voted for Trump because they just plain didn't like Clinton, but then I realized that that dislike is because of decades of misinformation from the right, and ignorance of how they had been sold a bill of goods.
Click to expand...
Or, it could be because she is just not likeable ( I didn't vote for Trump, but she's still not likeable)
 
Marcus said:
Or, it could be because she is just not likeable ( I didn't vote for Trump, but she's still not likeable)
Click to expand...
This makes just as much sense as voting for Trump because Clinton is a liar. We all know that Trump lies 3 times as much, so this opinion is, again based on misinformation and ignorance.
 
lionking said:
Oh mind reader now? Let's see how my prediction goes. Let's see you celebrating Putin's Trump-sanctioned belligerence.
Click to expand...


Mate, we've just seen how the loudmouthed, arrogant "predictions" you've saturated this place with for many months have gone totally wrong, Mr. "humble pie". Better eat it.
 
Foolmewunz said:
You had, at one point, the single coherent argument against Clinton. You got lost along the way. But if you think the Clinton adventures were murderous, wait'll you see what Flynn and Newt get into.
Click to expand...


I've stopped making that argument because people didn't care about it, if you remember. After all it weren't Yankistanis who were slaughtered. I think you will be wrong on this as well. Contrary to "humanitarian interventionist" scum like Powers, Nuland and Rice, the people Trump will hire after firing them will be people who know what war is.
 
Without hatred of Clinton to united them, the Trump "coalition" will soon fall apart.

"What? You mean if you repeal Obamacare, my 22 year old kid gets kicked off my plan? Why didn't someone tell me?"

And so on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom