The Unofficial Election 2016 Results Thread PLEASE

Let me rephrase:

Because they are the largest single voting bloc, you have to at least appear to take their concerns seriously, not just vilify them.

For instance immigration: This is a serious concern if you are a non-college-educated white male. It's not racist to think someone who isn't an American might illegally cross the border and do your job for less money.

It might not be racist but it's silly. If you want big salaries, expect other people to be willing to do the same job for less.
 
We're going to be bringing our birth rates back up and we may lose some territory but we WILL, at some point soon, have parts of this globe designated for us and us alone again.
Ok... but it won't be here.

[Quite]I believe Vladamir Putin is getting close to the kind of mindset necessary for this.[/quote]
Won't work there either.

Be afraid. There is a coalition of white nationalist governments forming.

Marine Le Pen, here we come.
Ooooo, sorry I don't scare easy. (Not gonna work in France either.)

only we could get Nigel in as the PM of the UK... and that Pauline person in Australia...
Neither of those either.

See, very few people could tell my boy is black. We're both passing, but he has his mother's eyes, a bit darker blue. Anyway, he's not the only one, so that black blood is just gonna keep a mixin. As will asian, white, Hispanic, Jewish, etc...

Heh, it's come too far now.
 
Good post.
And to add, Hillary probably never had a chance with these people either. You have to consider that when choosing a candidate. Democrats chose poorly.
No mainstream Democrat would.

Democrats choose poorly because Hillary isn't particularly likeable and has a bunch of baggage. A more charismatic candidate without the baggage but otherwise the same would have won because more Democrats would have turned out for him/her.
 
Let me rephrase:

Because they are the largest single voting bloc, you have to at least appear to take their concerns seriously, not just vilify them.

For instance immigration: This is a serious concern if you are a non-college-educated white male. It's not racist to think someone who isn't an American might illegally cross the border and do your job for less money.

Trump's (crazy) answer was "Build a wall"
The Democrat response to rural whites is "stop being racist"

Which has more appeal?

But it should be far less a concern in rural area, as barring picking , most illegal immigration goes rather for big cities. And in addition illegal immigration stabilized, in many state it in fact dropped.

So are those concern even valid or are they the xenophobic perception of an aging population ? I do not mean that to be disparaging, I saw the same damn phenomenon in the member of my family : the perception of invasion , of increasing violence by foreigner, when in reality there is no such invasion, and violence dropped (and it is statistically lower for illegal immigratn than the normal population).

So how do you help with that perception, when factual data shows it is misplaced ?
 
No mainstream Democrat would.

Democrats choose poorly because Hillary isn't particularly likeable and has a bunch of baggage. A more charismatic candidate without the baggage but otherwise the same would have won because more Democrats would have turned out for him/her.

Biden?

It is not silly to expect or want the government to protect your interests.

If your interests are silly, it is.
 
I think white people don't like being put in a breeding war with third worlders WITHIN THEIR OWN DAMNED BORDERS!

You are speaking in code. How the heck does this have something to do with white people having children at greater than replacement rates? Japan is a homogeneous nation and they also have low birth rates.
 
You are speaking in code. How the heck does this have something to do with white people having children at greater than replacement rates? Japan is a homogeneous nation and they also have low birth rates.

Skeptic Tank thinks this is some sort of conflict. He doesn't seem to understand that the main driver of birth rates is poverty.
 
But it should be far less a concern in rural area, as barring picking , most illegal immigration goes rather for big cities. And in addition illegal immigration stabilized, in many state it in fact dropped.

So are those concern even valid or are they the xenophobic perception of an aging population ? I do not mean that to be disparaging, I saw the same damn phenomenon in the member of my family : the perception of invasion , of increasing violence by foreigner, when in reality there is no such invasion, and violence dropped (and it is statistically lower for illegal immigratn than the normal population).

So how do you help with that perception, when factual data shows it is misplaced ?

Yea, I think there is a feeling that the cat is out of the bag with regard to illegal immigration (and I dont mean to derail the thread with this topic, but just an example) and that incremental gains amount to too-little too-late. So people are still frustrated that wages have dropped across the board as a result of the influx of people willing to do the job cheaper. Again, not racist but probably pretty clearly the result of non-Americans causing those wages to go down. And there is some racism there to be sure, but the larger point is the sense of being done wrong, or neglected by the government over the past however long, and now being called racist for harping on it. I have an uncle who is a stone mason in Chicago who pisses and moans endlessly about how Eastern Europeans are taking all the brick work... same kind of thing. Not really race based.

So how do you appeal to that? Acknowledge it is an issue, highlight the gains you've made and have and steer clear of demonizing people if you can.
 
Skeptic Tank thinks this is some sort of conflict. He doesn't seem to understand that the main driver of birth rates is poverty.

If you look at the video entitled "immigration and gum balls" you'll see that there is literally no way to avoid the vast majority of this species being in poverty.

This planet doesn't have the resources to keep 8 billion (and fast rising) out of poverty.

A small portion of us can live well, and I intend to be within that small portion.

8 billion is far, far more than we should have ever allowed ourselves to get up to.

We should target a worldwide population of 1 or 2 billion. Sterilize the entire third world.
 
Last edited:
I agree with the first sentence but not with the second one.

Well you're on your way to realizing what I did: there is no other way.

That's actually the softest approach.

You know that I was a HUGE liberal cuck, right? I mean, total pacifist... Obama lover... the works. Used to call myself a communist a couple times, more often a socialist if I was feeling less edgy.

I saw the brutal truth about nature and life. It's not pretty. People aren't equal and this planet can't support this many of us, and those numbers are skyrocketing.

The only hope for this planet is billions fewer humans.

The environment will be destroyed, and every endangered species devoured. Something must be done.
 
Last edited:
Putin says he wants to restore full fledged relations now that Donald has been elected. Not a terrible thing in of itself. But in reality it means that he wants Donald to let him do whatever he likes and there is an excellent chance that Donald will agree.

Remember in 2012 when Romney was saying that Russia is the biggest threat to the US? How times have changed.

It is under these circumstances. It's a tragedy.
 
Well you're on your way to realizing what I did: there is no other way.

No, I'm not a racist scumbag. Sorry.

You know that I was a HUGE liberal cuck, right? I mean, total pacifist... Obama lover... the works. Used to call myself a communist a couple times, more often a socialist if I was feeling less edgy.

So you have a history of espousing extremist, stupid ideologies.

The only hope for this planet is billions fewer humans.

How about we wipe out white people and asians and see if the blacks can do it, then?
 

Back
Top Bottom