Voters in NE, OK and probably even CA are strengthening the death penalty![]()
You can only be pro-life to a point. Hypocrites!
Voters in NE, OK and probably even CA are strengthening the death penalty![]()
Final anylysis: People wanted a change really bad...and now they will get relaly bad change.
Sanders did have a hardcore group of "BernieBros". But remember that he was in some respect an outsider to the Democratic party. He'd solidify the left wing vote but would risk loosing some of the right wing vote and/or moderate republicans who did vote for Hillary.Depends on whether he would have energized the Dem base. Turnout is what killed us. R voters fired up. D voters discouraged because we got the Machine candidate.Sanders would have been vaporized in this election.
Whether or not women do have sex if they do and get pregnant the baby's rights are it's own and not subject to her whim. It's not the baby's fault and the baby should not have to die because of the woman's actions.
Sanders did have a hardcore group of "BernieBros". But remember that he was in some respect an outsider to the Democratic party. He'd solidify the left wing vote but would risk loosing some of the right wing vote and/or moderate republicans who did vote for Hillary.
Not only that, Sanders never really faced significant scrutiny from the Republicans, and was pretty much ignored by the Republican party. The moment he becomes the Democratic nominee, you would see all sorts of anti-Sanders rhetoric... he'd be labeled "Comrade Sanders", his self-proclaimed "socialist" description would be repeated over and over again, things like his honeymoon in Russia would be seen as him being beholden to the Communist overlords.
Then of course you also have fundraising. Hillary raised a lot of money. Granted, she still lost, but it might have been worse without the money they had for campaign ads. Sanders wanted to avoid large donors, and although it may seem principled to avoid "big money", it would make it much more difficult to run the election.
So yes, Sanders would be smoked.
Whether or not women do have sex if they do and get pregnant the baby's rights are it's own and not subject to her whim. It's not the baby's fault and the baby should not have to die because of the woman's actions.
You can only be pro-life to a point. Hypocrites!
Will you support social programs that help that baby grow up not experiencing a life of impoverished misery?
Innocent babies deserve protection. Murderers, rapists, etc have demonstrated their inability to live as civilized persons.
Not even remotely equivalent.
Sanders did have a hardcore group of "BernieBros". But remember that he was in some respect an outsider to the Democratic party. He'd solidify the left wing vote but would risk loosing some of the right wing vote and/or moderate republicans who did vote for Hillary.
Not only that, Sanders never really faced significant scrutiny from the Republicans, and was pretty much ignored by the Republican party. The moment he becomes the Democratic nominee, you would see all sorts of anti-Sanders rhetoric... he'd be labeled "Comrade Sanders", his self-proclaimed "socialist" description would be repeated over and over again, things like his honeymoon in Russia would be seen as him being beholden to the Communist overlords.
Then of course you also have fundraising. Hillary raised a lot of money. Granted, she still lost, but it might have been worse without the money they had for campaign ads. Sanders wanted to avoid large donors, and although it may seem principled to avoid "big money", it would make it much more difficult to run the election.
So yes, Sanders would be smoked.
Except for the the ones who have been executed for crimes they didn't actually commit.
Tim Heidecker
FYI these guys won tonight.
ronny coight
@timheidecker HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
SUCK **** FAGGOT…
Fox has trump up 75k in az