Trump's Little Stormtroopers....

[Jrrarglblarg]

We fill in the whol box, not a cross or circle, but apparently it's common for people to write "no" in the box for issues, and gods forbid you mark the roaring box and desire to correct it. The instructions for that are apparently way too complicated for the kind of people who mismark an important once-ever document.

 

[logger]

Trump is a Trumpian. I am a conservative, so no. He is whatever he needs to be to get attention and power.

I'm not surprised by your non answer. I agree Trump has waffled on some issues, but you know where hills is and by voting Johnson, you're contributing to her vote count.

The reason you gave a non answer is because you're not truly serious about conservatism, that is why you're able to throw away your vote. Many times I've had to vote for the lesser of two evils, you seem happy to have the lib elected. You follow a pattern of fake conservatives.

 

[NoahFence]

Take off your blinders, Logger.

Hillary's actually pretty centrist. You act as if she's a radical leftist.

 

[logger]

Take off your blinders, Logger.

Hillary's actually pretty centrist. You act as if she's a radical leftist.

Lol

There aren't any centrist dems, used to be, not anymore.

 

[NoahFence]

Uh, yes there are.

There used to be rational righties. Not anymore.

 

[ponderingturtle]

Take off your blinders, Logger.

Hillary's actually pretty centrist. You act as if she's a radical leftist.

Yea she hits right around the RINO Reagan. No one would ever mistake him for a conservative.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

logger, why don't you have a look at Reagan's, Nixon's or Bush Sr. policies?

For most, they are left of Clinton's...

 

[NoahFence]

logger, why don't you have a look at Reagan's, Nixon's or Bush Sr. policies?

For most, they are left of Clinton's...

That would require work, and upon a response, honesty.

 

[jimbob]

How is favouring someone who aims to violate the fourth to eighth amendments, as well as the first "conservative"?

How is it that you can make things up out of thin air?

Despite what you might think, Clinton is not going to violate the second amendment.

Yes, because she doesn't have the congress. If Obama had the congress, wouldn't he have severely restricted guns? Just like hills would.

If it's good enough for Donald, it's good enough for everyone.

Except that Trump's stated policies would violate several of them

First Amendment - freedom of religion - doesn't square with banning Muslims.
Second Amendment - OK on this one
Third Amendment - OK on this one
Fourth Amendment - some of Trump's proposed policies towards supposed domestic terrorists, his promise to lock up Clinton.
Fifth Amendment - I'd have thought that torture violates this one
Sixth Amendment - Torture looks to probably violate this
Seventh Amendment - OK fair call, it doesn't look to violate this
Eighth Amendment - if torture isn't cruel and unusual then I don't know what is

 

[Andy_Ross]

Eighth Amendment - if torture isn't cruel and unusual then I don't know what is

It depends, are you putting Fuelair in charge of the punishment?

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

TrumpTrooper Update:
Sitting waiting at the grownup store for a preroll in on the way to watch the count.

{edit. To add}
Short line! Radio silence until the count is over. Jrrarglblarg out.

 

[applecorped]

 

[Noztradamus]

The number of people who put a circle in the box rather than a cross was staggering. It's been a cross for the history of elections! However it still counts.

What if they put a tick instead of a cross? Isn't that really confusing?

 

[Noztradamus]

We fill in the whol box, not a cross or circle, but apparently it's common for people to write "no" in the box for issues, and gods forbid you mark the roaring box and desire to correct it. The instructions for that are apparently way too complicated for the kind of people who mismark an important once-ever document.

You have a roaring box? is that like a Hogwarts Howler?

 

[gypsyjackson]

What if they put a tick instead of a cross? Isn't that really confusing?

Tick would also be OK, if it were clear whom they were supporting. Writing yes or hooray, or whatever is also ok.

There was a funny case on one of our satirical news shows where they found a ballot which said something like 'is a dick' in the box next to one candidate, and the teller noted it was written entirely within the confines of the box so declared it a valid vote for the candidate, which was accepted by the observers - presumably not a close vote, or perhaps it might have been dealt with differently.

 

[Noztradamus]

Tick would also be OK, if it were clear whom they were supporting. Writing yes or hooray, or whatever is also ok.

.

I meant a

 

[gypsyjackson]

That would also be OK if it were done in the box! In fact, I'm stealing that the next time I vote in person. Thanks.

 

[ponderingturtle]

Except that Trump's stated policies would violate several of them

First Amendment - freedom of religion - doesn't square with banning Muslims.
Second Amendment - OK on this one
Third Amendment - OK on this one
Fourth Amendment - some of Trump's proposed policies towards supposed domestic terrorists, his promise to lock up Clinton.
Fifth Amendment - I'd have thought that torture violates this one
Sixth Amendment - Torture looks to probably violate this
Seventh Amendment - OK fair call, it doesn't look to violate this
Eighth Amendment - if torture isn't cruel and unusual then I don't know what is

Ah but it isn't a punishment so it gets a pass, it is an interrogation technique.