Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
cantonear1968 said:
Thank you for the information. And that's really messed. I remember The Daily Show doing a story on hiw Republicans redrew district lines to be more Right friendly. The system IS rigged. Just notin the way Trump fantasizes.
Click to expand...

You're welcome
In all fairness Gerrymandering is not new. There is no doubt that the Democrats also engage in this practice when they can. This is why electing majority state legislatures and Governors particularly 20X0 elections. Because they are the ones that do this.
 
acbytesla said:
You're welcome
In all fairness Gerrymandering is not new. There is no doubt that the Democrats also engage in this practice when they can. This is why electing majority state legislatures and Governors particularly 20X0 elections. Because they are the ones that do this.
Click to expand...

Or do what California did: Get a initiative that takes redistricting out of the hands of the politicians entirely and puts it in the hands of a non partisan commission.
But Gerrymandering is nothing new: It gets it name from Elbert Gerry, a Massachusetts Federalist who drew district boundaries to favor his party in 1812,prompting this cartoon:


 
The Big Dog said:
They are not saying anything about Hillary, they are publishing authentic emails from Hillary and her craven gang of thugs and lick-spittles, none of whom have been able to contradict any of those authenticated emails.
Click to expand...

Your multitude of conspiracy theories about Hillary have clung to so much less. How do you know they are authentic emails? What assures you of their authenticity?

I don't think they're fake, by any means. I just don't see anything guaranteeing their authenticity. Wikileaks certainly has been sitting on them for awhile, and they've obviously read through them, or else how else would they know there are bombshells? What would stop them from adding characters into an email no one has seen before? I'll just wait for your evidence.

The Big Dog said:
By the way, huge irony on the hyper-partisan comment! *snipped text size change*
Click to expand...

I don't think irony is the word you're looking for at this point.
 
So no Wikileaks bombshell yet? What is dear leader Assange waiting for, polls open in like 9.5 hours.
 
Hilary is now at the 70% mark at 538. And that is a site that is more bullish on Trump's chances then most. My own guess, even when Trump was at 13%,that he would end up ,election eve, with a 25% chance to win.
 
plague311 said:
Your multitude of conspiracy theories about Hillary have clung to so much less. How do you know they are authentic emails? What assures you of their authenticity?

I don't think they're fake, by any means. I just don't see anything guaranteeing their authenticity. Wikileaks certainly has been sitting on them for awhile, and they've obviously read through them, or else how else would they know there are bombshells? What would stop them from adding characters into an email no one has seen before? I'll just wait for your evidence.

I don't think irony is the word you're looking for at this point.
Click to expand...

see that highlighted sentence. What skeptic is going to be the first to figure out the massive flaw in his reasoning.

C'mon, blow my hair back skeptics.
 
Tony Stark said:
So no Wikileaks bombshell yet? What is dear leader Assange waiting for, polls open in like 9.5 hours.
Click to expand...

The polls have been open for weeks. ....well sort of. About 1/3 of all votes are expected to have been cast in some form of early voting. My state is probably more than 50 percent since we vote entirely by mail. I miss going to the polls and voting in person, but this is easier. Never need to wait in a line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom