Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
wareyin said:
I hate to give you the sobering news, but nobody is falling for your nonsense.



And, using The Big Dog logic, I have now proven that The Big Dog is drunk at 11:30 his time on a Sunday morning, and a chronic alcoholic. I wonder if that's why he is so sensitive to mentions of alcohol?
Click to expand...

I've seen it written that a certain canine loves the booze even before lunch. Not sure what to believe...
 
Megalodon said:
On a totally different note, why is it against the rules to call a lying liar that keeps spreading proven lies, a liar? It's not uncivil to state the obvious, surely...
Click to expand...

Because pointing out when lying liars are lying by calling them lying liars is discussing the person, not the content. Far better to just open your mouth and let the seventh wave of bull **** flow in,,,Vote trump! His **** tastes better than Hillary's,!!!
 
Jrrarglblarg said:
Trump,doesn't drink! Vote trump, he probably isn't guilty of kidnapping and child rape!
Click to expand...

No but Carrie Fischer says his constant sniffing indicates chronic cocaine use and she was a chronic cocaine user herself so that makes her an expert meaning Trump is a chronic cocaine user and I've just provided....you know..... evidence for this.
:rolleyes:
 
Jrrarglblarg said:
Because pointing out when lying liars are lying by calling them lying liars is discussing the person, not the content. Far better to just open your mouth and let the seventh wave of bull **** flow in,,,Vote trump! His **** tastes better than Hillary's,!!!
Click to expand...

That's a pity, because lying liars spreading proven lies deserve to be called on their lies, and labelled lying liars. Oh well...
 
cantonear1968 said:
"Sober" has more than one meaning and several do not include alcohol.

"Clubbing" does not mean she had anything to drink let alone excessively.

Pictures of Hillary with a drink in her hand only means on those occasions in her 70 years of life she had a drink.

Point by point.

You can continue your hypocrisy if you wish, but I've repeatedly shown your dishonestly. All that's left is for you to admit it.
Click to expand...

Point by point means something more than saying:

No, nope and uh uh!

Not that your hand waves are that eloquent.

We are seeing the stages of grief (lots of denial and so much anger) and she has not even lost yet!
 
The Big Dog said:
Point by point means something more than saying:

No, nope and uh uh!

Not that your hand waves are that eloquent.

We are seeing the stages of grief (lots of denial and so much anger) and she has not even lost yet!
Click to expand...

I notice you have yet to retract your claim that I lied.

Your dishonesty is.. appalling.
 
The Big Dog said:
Point by point means something more than saying:

No, nope and uh uh!

Not that your hand waves are that eloquent.

We are seeing the stages of grief (lots of denial and so much anger) and she has not even lost yet!
Click to expand...

Point by point means exposing what you are calling evidence as being absolutely worthless as any sort of evidentiary value. That you cannot defend this but simply repost your false evidence proves this.

What evidence do you have Clinton is a "problem drinker"? If that is all you have I understand your frustration at having your deception exposed.
 
The Big Dog said:
Point by point means something more than saying:

No, nope and uh uh!

Not that your hand waves are that eloquent.

We are seeing the stages of grief (lots of denial and so much anger) and she has not even lost yet!
Click to expand...

Sometimes being drunk causes one to not understand what is going on. I can assure you that sober people aren't seeing what you're claiming here.
 
cantonear1968 said:
Point by point means exposing what you are calling evidence as being absolutely worthless as any sort of evidentiary value. That you cannot defend this but simply repost your false evidence proves this.

What evidence do you have Clinton is a "problem drinker"? If that is all you have I understand your frustration at having your deception exposed.
Click to expand...

TBD despises Hillary Clinton. As though Hillary opened up care facilities, and then denied the poor people medicine and basic hygiene.

The hate is all he knows, and thus, anything negative said must be true. He's no skeptic.
 
cantonear1968 said:
Point by point means exposing what you are calling evidence as being absolutely worthless as any sort of evidentiary value. That you cannot defend this but simply repost your false evidence proves this.

What evidence do you have Clinton is a "problem drinker"? If that is all you have I understand your frustration at having your deception exposed.
Click to expand...

'K.

Say, a couple of hours it will be time for Podesta to sober her up.
 
Shalamar said:
TBD despises Hillary Clinton. As though Hillary opened up care facilities, and then denied the poor people medicine and basic hygiene.

The hate is all he knows, and thus, anything negative said must be true. He's no skeptic.
Click to expand...

It's a shame. I enjoyed his posts on the 9/11 Conspiracy sub-forum. It's sad seeing him use the same false arguments as truthers do.
 
The Big Dog said:
'K.

Say, a couple of hours it will be time for Podesta to sober her up.
Click to expand...

"Sober" has several different meanings, some which have nothing to do with alcohol.

What evidence do you have that Clinton is a "problem drinker"? I await your admission that you just made it up.
 
Gingrich is on MTP claiming Trump is great, has fantastic ideas, he's revolutionary, and Clinton is a corrupt, dishonest politician. Chuck Todd isn't calling him on anything.


Now he's tiptoeing around the lie asking if 'we' are using the term corruption when it's not that bad. Just leaves Gingrich an opening to blame the media for not addressing Clinton's corruption.

Now Gingrich says, I wish it wasn't true and Chuck Todd agreed with him.


Disgusting!
 
Last edited:
Skeptic Ginger said:
Gingrich is on MTP claiming Trump is great, has fantastic ideas, he's revolutionary, and Clinton is a corrupt, dishonest politician. Chuck Todd isn't calling him on anything.


Now he's tiptoeing around the lie asking if 'we' are using the term corruption when it's not that bad. Just leaves Gingrich an opening to blame the media for not addressing Clinton's corruption.

Now Gingrich says, I wish it wasn't true and Chuck Todd agreed with him.


Disgusting!
Click to expand...

Bill Maher surmised the United Fascists of America if Trump were to win with Chris Christie as Attorney General and Rudy Giuliani as FBI Director. What does Gingrich get? National Security Advisor?

And who gets Press Secretary: Alex Jones or Rush Limbaugh?

:jaw-dropp
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom