• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hillary sent her awful surrogates out to raise the mobs against the Director of the FBI.

I have never seen so many threats against a law enforcement officer ever.

Pathetic
 
The Big Dog said:
Hillary sent her awful surrogates out to raise the mobs against the Director of the FBI.

I have never seen so many threats against a law enforcement officer ever.

Pathetic
Click to expand...
Perhaps he should have done his job right.

His career at the FBI is likely over and it is his fault.
 
eerok said:
Your self-serving attitude toward criminal action is indeed pathetic. There's no question that Comey should be made to answer for his interference with the election.
Click to expand...
It isn't criminal but it is something he deserves to lose his job over. Hopefully Obama will fire him after the election.
 
eerok said:
Your self-serving attitude toward criminal action is indeed pathetic. There's no question that Comey should be made to answer for his interference with the election.
Click to expand...

He didn't interfere. It is true, they are looking at emails. That is their prerogative. It doesn't affect either candidate.
 
The Big Dog said:
Hillary sent her awful surrogates out to raise the mobs against the Director of the FBI.

I have never seen so many threats against a law enforcement officer ever.

Pathetic
Click to expand...

How horrible for that FBI Director!

I am sure that if you were to offer your services to him, then he would be glad to have such a highly intelligent and honest individual such as yourself on his team of protectors.
 
BobTheCoward said:
He didn't interfere. It is true, they are looking at emails. That is their prerogative. It doesn't affect either candidate.
Click to expand...
Looking at the emails isn't the interference. Sending that vague letter to Congress was. It was a highly unusual move; they typically never comment on investigations. He must have known the Republicans would instantly leak it and attempt to use it against Hillary. And if he didn't know that, he is way too stupid to be the Director of the FBI.
 
Last edited:
BobTheCoward said:
He didn't interfere. It is true, they are looking at emails. That is their prerogative. It doesn't affect either candidate.
Click to expand...

He sent a letter to congresspeople, knowing that it would go to the press in a second. That is unprecedented, and it falls under the Hatch Act.

To say that it doesn't affect either candidate shows lack of thought on the matter. If the audiences for Trump's fraud and rape trials had been set for this week, would you be of the opinion that it wouldn't affect the election?
 
Megalodon said:
He sent a letter to congresspeople, knowing that it would go to the press in a second. That is unprecedented, and it falls under the Hatch Act.

To say that it doesn't affect either candidate shows lack of thought on the matter. If the audiences for Trump's fraud and rape trials had been set for this week, would you be of the opinion that it wouldn't affect the election?
Click to expand...

Correct. This doesn't alter any evidence about any candidate (as demonstrated by the opinions of people on this thread). No one is prevented from campaigning or voting.
 
Last edited:
Megalodon said:
He sent a letter to congresspeople, knowing that it would go to the press in a second. That is unprecedented, and it falls under the Hatch Act.

To say that it doesn't affect either candidate shows lack of thought on the matter. If the audiences for Trump's fraud and rape trials had been set for this week, would you be of the opinion that it wouldn't affect the election?
Click to expand...

He sent the letter to a specific congressman before sending it out en masse - removing any doubt as to his intentions.
 
Megalodon said:
He sent a letter to congresspeople, knowing that it would go to the press in a second. That is unprecedented, and it falls under the Hatch Act.

To say that it doesn't affect either candidate shows lack of thought on the matter. If the audiences for Trump's fraud and rape trials had been set for this week, would you be of the opinion that it wouldn't affect the election?
Click to expand...

Bad example.

It's already pretty clear no matter what comes out about Trump, the galactic morons who support him wouldn't care.

Any other year this "what if" scenario would be prudent. Not this year.
 
So many experts on the Hatch Act

Must have gotten a primer when issued the torch and pitchfork.

Pathetic.
 
The Big Dog said:
So many experts on the Hatch Act

Must have gotten a primer when issued the torch and pitchfork.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...

As you know, a law professor and former chief Bush White House ethics lawyer filed a Hatch complaint because of this.

Let me guess, you are more of an expert than him.
 
The Big Dog said:
So many experts on the Hatch Act

Must have gotten a primer when issued the torch and pitchfork.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...

Oh, Dear!

Welcome to the internet. You must be new in town. Anyone can read the Hatch Act. Which part of it are you having trouble with? Perhaps we could help you out? You are normally quite good at interpreting the words of judge's rulings, conflicting government regulations, etc... Or is that a mental dexterity that only applies to nailing witches' hides to the partisan barn?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom