• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw.

Under normal circumstances I could easily see a judge denying the warrant based on the "fruit of the poison tree" doctrine.

I don't think that doctrine applies.

It might if the original seizing of Wiener's laptop was illegal or otherwise improper. I don't think that's been asserted. So no "poisonous tree".

If you have a lawful warrant to search for something, in general anything found is evidence, even if evidence related to another crime.

But there are limits. The example sometimes given is that if you're searching an apartment for a stolen elephant, you can't start opening drawers. Anything found within the drawers would be inadmissible, since they were beyond the scope of the warrant. But find a stolen horse, and it could be lawfully seized.

Caveat: I'm clearly not a lawyer, and will yield to anyone with a deeper understanding of the concept.
 
I'll say this about this election. It is definitely the most interesting of my lifetime. But I wouldn't say that is a good thing.

Agreed.

And if we could come back in fifty years I think history will record the 2016 elections as one of the worst episodes in American political history. Unless we're living under a totalitarian dictatorship by then, in which case we'll probably find a statute of Donald Trump in every public square.
 
Agreed.

And if we could come back in fifty years I think history will record the 2016 elections as one of the worst episodes in American political history. Unless we're living under a totalitarian dictatorship by then, in which case we'll probably find a statute of Donald Trump in every public square.

Thanks, now I'm going to have nightmares.
 
Agreed.

And if we could come back in fifty years I think history will record the 2016 elections as one of the worst episodes in American political history. Unless we're living under a totalitarian dictatorship by then, in which case we'll probably find a statute of Donald Trump in every public square.

God King Barron will have rewritten history and replaced those with statues of himself by then. ;)
 
You claimed I avoided it last time, which was false. Read better

Ok! So the Big Dog wants to take a run around the track. My bet is he doesn't win, place or show.

You say didn't avoid this? Let's see:

The Big Dog said:
cantonear1968 said:
The Big Dog said:
cantonear1968 said:
The Big Dog said:
cantonear1968 said:
The Big Dog said:

So please show me where you addressed the evidence that Clinton has a "pretty severe drinking problem".

You know, the key to digging your own grave is you should stop when you can still climb out. If you keep digging you just get in over your head.
 
It is illegal for a private citizen, such as Trump, to urge a foreign government or agents of that government to illegally hack into American servers and email accounts.
Indicting Trump now would be seen as illegally trying to influence the election but he may well end up being indicted later. Racketeering is an area to explore. Also lets the U.S. seize his assets :)
 
Ok! So the Big Dog wants to take a run around the track. My bet is he doesn't win, place or show.

You say didn't avoid this? Let's see:









So please show me where you addressed the evidence that Clinton has a "pretty severe drinking problem".

You know, the key to digging your own grave is you should stop when you can still climb out. If you keep digging you just get in over your head.

The part where Podesta had to go sober her drunk ass up at 4 o'clock in the afternoon.

Oh noes! I should stop pointing out that John Podesta was told to go sober her up at 4 o'clock in the afternoon! I am digging my own grave, filled with Hillary's empty whiskey bottles.
 
The part where Podesta had to go sober her drunk ass up at 4 o'clock in the afternoon.

Oh noes! I should stop pointing out that John Podesta was told to go sober her up at 4 o'clock in the afternoon! I am digging my own grave, filled with Hillary's empty whiskey bottles.

And we come full circle:
cantonear1968 said:

I'm willing to wait and see if you answer it this time or, again, claim it's an "old joke".
 
I'd like to see them try anf fail tragically.

Mainly because I'm in a different country altogether.

Since those guys in Oregon were acquitted some armed Trump fans may be emboldened to seize a federal building or something if Trump loses. I'm not sure any of Trump's diehard crowd really want this but the pool of potential recruits is large.
 
Last edited:
And we come full circle:


I'm willing to wait and see if you answer it this time or, again, claim it's an "old joke".

Hey, jimbob, go down to the bar and make hillary soberly aware of the situation.

That is exactly the way people speak!

Glug, glug, glug!
 
Hey, jimbob, go down to the bar and make hillary soberly aware of the situation.

That is exactly the way people speak!

Glug, glug, glug!

And again we see you avoiding the question.

Well done.

I'm willing to keep asking as long as you have it in your sig:

What evidence do you have HRC is a "problem drinker"? You can just say it's that one email which is ambiguous at best and we'll be done.

But I am going to have to ask you to change your sig.
 
And again we see you avoiding the question.

Well done.

I'm willing to keep asking as long as you have it in your sig:

What evidence do you have HRC is a "problem drinker"? You can just say it's that one email which is ambiguous at best and we'll be done.

But I am going to have to ask you to change your sig.

A new WikiLeaks email dump reveals Hillary Clinton may have been boozed up at 4:30 in the afternoon when her campaign tried to reach her in August 2015.

An Aug. 8, 2015, email exchange between Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and communications aide Jennifer Palmieri revealed the two discussing whether to call Hillary and “sober her up some.”

“Should I call her and talk this through or better leave with you?” Podesta asked at 2 p.m. “I’m worried she’ll get on with Cheryl [Mills] and we’ll end up in a bad place.”

It took Palmieri two hours to respond to Podesta’s question.

“I think you should call her and sober her up some,” she said.
 
A new WikiLeaks email dump reveals Hillary Clinton may have been boozed up at 4:30 in the afternoon when her campaign tried to reach her in August 2015.

An Aug. 8, 2015, email exchange between Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and communications aide Jennifer Palmieri revealed the two discussing whether to call Hillary and “sober her up some.”

“Should I call her and talk this through or better leave with you?” Podesta asked at 2 p.m. “I’m worried she’ll get on with Cheryl [Mills] and we’ll end up in a bad place.”

It took Palmieri two hours to respond to Podesta’s question.

“I think you should call her and sober her up some,” she said.

Not sure why you're referencing the same email as if it is new.

Actually I do. Because you have nothing else.

What evidence do you have to accuse HRC of being a "problem drinker"?

Still waiting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom