Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

[The Big Dog]

It's just like how President Obama is either a ruthless would-be dictator implementing his agenda by grabbing power that the President isn't supposed to have, or a completely ineffectual non-entity who can't accomplish anything.

Except no one is claiming that Hillary is a calculating mastermind.

She is an ineffectual knucklehead who needs her handlers to sober her up at 4:00 in the afternoon.

 

[cantonear1968]

You think Hillary was behind 9/11?

Um..... ok.....

/huh, didn't expect him to go there....

You should try following the threads more closely. I made no such claim.

Or is this just deflection?

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

You think Hillary was behind 9/11?

Um..... ok.....

/huh, didn't expect him to go there....

Huh. It seems reading for content is something we should work on.

 

[The Big Dog]

Here is what you said:

Did you forget already?

It's a reference to an old joke. Don't worry about it. Here's another:

Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills walked into a bar.

 

[The Big Dog]

I love how she's a calculating mastermind or a mindless shell, depending on the moment's needs.

Almost Truthereque, isn't it? "They" are so smart to have pulled off the greatest cover up in history yet so incompetent to leave clues around for the meddling internet sleuths.

You don't think 9/11, if what Truthers say is true, would be the greatest cover up ever?

'k.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Except no one is claiming that Hillary is a calculating mastermind.

She is an ineffectual knucklehead who needs her handlers to sober her up at 4:00 in the afternoon.

I think it's very cute how you've managed to extrapolate from one out of context word that seems to me to have been used metaphorically not literally and create an entire scenario around it.

 

[Megalodon]

Except no one is claiming that Hillary is a calculating mastermind.

She is an ineffectual knucklehead who needs her handlers to sober her up at 4:00 in the afternoon.

Repeat after me: Madam President... it rolls off the tongue, smooth as the rolling of hateful tears.

 

[Spindrift]

I think it's very cute how you've managed to extrapolate from one out of context word that seems to me to have been used metaphorically not literally and create an entire scenario around it.

When you got nothing, you work with whatever you can find.

 

[Megalodon]

I think it's very cute how you've managed to extrapolate from one out of context word that seems to me to have been used metaphorically not literally and create an entire scenario around it.

That is quite literally the history of all of Hillary's scandals. They all boil down to republican lies.

 

[The Big Dog]

I love how she's a calculating mastermind or a mindless shell, depending on the moment's needs.

I think it's very cute how you've managed to extrapolate from one out of context word that seems to me to have been used metaphorically not literally and create an entire scenario around it.

Did you not read the utterly ridiculous strawman?

Take a gander at it again.

And thanks for calling me "cute."

by the way, not a calculating mastermind, just a mindless shell.

 

[cantonear1968]

'k.

Thank you for the context. It shows the reference of the claim; that your argument is Trutheresque.

Subject is anything you need it to be in the moment for your argument.
Referencing unreliable sources.
Not reading sources to know what they say.
Not defending anything you say.

If you'd like me to be a little less insulting (even though ironically accurate), I'm willing to refer to your arguments as "Trumpesque"^TM.

 

[The Big Dog]

That is quite literally the history of all of Hillary's scandals. They all boil down to republican lies.

Not keeping up with the emails thread, huh?

 

[Crossbow]

Except no one is claiming that Hillary is a calculating mastermind.

She is an ineffectual knucklehead who needs her handlers to sober her up at 4:00 in the afternoon.

Have you considered seeing a therapist about your projection problem?

 

[cantonear1968]

It's a reference to an old joke. Don't worry about it. Here's another:

Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills walked into a bar.

Really? What's the joke?

And why do you say "Hillary will raise a glass or three" if it was just a joke?

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

I didn't you are cute, I said your idea is cute. Like a teeny tiny replica. A dollhouse idea, 1/12 the size of a real idea. And doesn't it look realistic! So cute!

 

[The Big Dog]

Thank you for the context. It shows the reference of the claim; that your argument is Trutheresque.

well I hate to have to go ahead and sort of disagree with you, but you do realize that you have swallowed the straw man hook line and sinker, don't you?

Lets break that down:

"I love how she's a calculating mastermind or a mindless shell, depending on the moment's needs."

See the highlighted part? I have never said anything remotely close to that ever. She is not and has never been a "calculating mastermind."

I hope that clears that up!

/by the way, I struck your list of ad homs, might want to rethink those for next time?

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Did you not read the utterly ridiculous strawman?

Take a gander at it again.

And thanks for calling me "cute."

by the way, not a calculating mastermind, just a mindless shell.

I said nothing of the kind. I said your idea is cute. Like a teeny tiny replica idea, a dollhouse scale version of a real idea. Look close, see how realistic it is? So cute!

I bet you thought it up all by yourself too, and didn't read it somewhere else!

 

[Megalodon]

Not keeping up with the emails thread, huh?

You have nothing.
Thousands of emails and all you show for it are phrases or words out of context, misinterpretations or outright lies.
You have less than nothing.

 

[xjx388]

Looks like she may be under criminal investigation again...this has to be the craziest election in history.

 

[The Big Dog]

You have nothing.
Thousands of emails and all you show for it are phrases or words out of context, misinterpretations or outright lies.
You have less than nothing.

Jeepers, a Hillary supporter in full throated denial?

Gosh!