Split Thread Signs of the End Times

Status
Not open for further replies.
Paul Bethke said:
O you deluded fella that cannot understand that God is giving you a chance to repent—and if you do not, you will go to hell.

So that is what is presented in the Scriptures. So how can my approach be twisted by what I present from the Scriptures?



I am not whining from those who reject the truth that I promulgate, I am quite pleased by the exposure of those who reject my Gospel as truth.



If I were to exclude preaching about hell, I would not be preaching the same Gospel of Jesus and his disciples.



So the conclusion of the matter ENDS like this---Rev 20:15 If anyone's name was not found written in the Book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.



So I hope one day you will come to your senses and repent, and have your name written in the Book of life.
Click to expand...



Why? You have presented no evidence to so why I should accept that your deity is real to the exclusion of all the others and why I should give that book any more credence than any other collection of myths.
 
Paul Bethke said:
O you deluded fella that cannot understand that God is giving you a chance to repent—and if you do not, you will go to hell.
So that is what is presented in the Scriptures. So how can my approach be twisted by what I present from the Scriptures?

I am not whining from those who reject the truth that I promulgate, I am quite pleased by the exposure of those who reject my Gospel as truth.

If I were to exclude preaching about hell, I would not be preaching the same Gospel of Jesus and his disciples.

So the conclusion of the matter ENDS like this---Rev 20:15 If anyone's name was not found written in the Book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

So I hope one day you will come to your senses and repent, and have your name written in the Book of life.
Click to expand...

And you think you should respect someone who throws people in lakes of fire?
 
Paul Bethke said:
O you deluded fella that cannot understand that God is giving you a chance to repent—and if you do not, you will go to hell.

So that is what is presented in the Scriptures. So how can my approach be twisted by what I present from the Scriptures?
Click to expand...



Given your Biblical illiteracy, incompetent evangelism, Lucifer grade pride and repeated failed prophesies, it's clear if the Bible is the word of God then you were either sent here by Satan to make Christians look worse or by God to harden our hearts by the same mechanism.
 
Paul Bethke said:
O you deluded fella...
Click to expand...

Nope. Remember the part where you didn't even know what the Bible said? Remember that thread you're trying ever so hard to pretend doesn't exist? That sort of conscious avoidance is more consistent with deliberate fraud than with simple zeal.

So how can my approach be twisted by what I present from the Scriptures?
Click to expand...

Because you don't know squat about the scriptures, Christian doctrine or Biblical history. You have a computer program that spits out Bible quotes when you give it keywords. Your knowledge begins and ends with the cut and paste commands. As with most zealots, you project your own bigotry and hatred onto religion and pretend it justifies you.

I am not whining from those who reject the truth that I promulgate...
Click to expand...

Nonsense. You whined about the clergy rejecting you when you tried to go "teach" them. Then to protect your ego you decided they were all corrupt.

If I were to exclude preaching about hell, I would not be preaching the same Gospel of Jesus and his disciples.
Click to expand...

By all means keep providing me with more evidence of your obsession over the punitive approach to Christianity.
 
JayUtah said:
Nope. Remember the part where you didn't even know what the Bible said? Remember that thread you're trying ever so hard to pretend doesn't exist? That sort of conscious avoidance is more consistent with deliberate fraud than with simple zeal.
Click to expand...
I still think you are deluded

Because you don't know squat about the scriptures, Christian doctrine or Biblical history. You have a computer program that spits out Bible quotes when you give it keywords. Your knowledge begins and ends with the cut and paste commands. As with most zealots, you project your own bigotry and hatred onto religion and pretend it justifies you.
Click to expand...
I still think you are deluded

Nonsense. You whined about the clergy rejecting you when you tried to go "teach" them. Then to protect your ego you decided they were all corrupt.
Click to expand...
I still think you are deluded

By all means keep providing me with more evidence of your obsession over the punitive approach to Christianity.
Click to expand...
Christianity is the 40k denominations that do not preach the Gospel of Jesus and the disciples—if they had, the situation in the world would not have deteriorated to the extent that it has, and the retribution would not be as severe as it is going to be. But the words of Peter outline the outcome---
1 Peter_4:17 For it is time for judgment to begin with the family of God; and if it begins with us, what will the outcome be for those who do not obey the gospel of God?
So what have you got to look forward too?

2 Peter_3:7 By the same word the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire, being kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

You see Sir so called Christians are afraid to preach what Jesus decreed----- Luke 16:18 "Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery, and the man who marries a divorced womancommits adultery.

So this is the present situation in this adulterous world—so now that I confront the Churches on their cowardly stance, people will come under judgement—you see there is a place for the cowards----

Rev_21:8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulphur. This is the second death."

So do you feature in the above?
 
Last edited:
Paul Bethke said:
Why because the collections of Scriptures that were preserved for man is the truth about the beginning and the END>
Click to expand...



So we're the Eddas. Why is your regional God from a small portion of the Middle East more relevant than Odin and Thor? Why are your collection of stories more real than the sagas?
 
Paul Bethke said:
Why because the collections of Scriptures that were preserved for man is the truth about the beginning and the END>
Click to expand...



Both Mormon and Muslim apologetic can argue that these texts were preserved only to make it easier for the "correct" texts to be recognized when Smith / Muhammad reveled the corrected word of God.

The only "evidence" you've offered to support your religious claims is your own ego. That is worthless as evidence as your repeated and demonstrable lies have proven your word to be worthless.
 
Paul Bethke said:
Well the words of Jesus---Luke_12:5 But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him.

Not respect –but fear.
Click to expand...
You have no prophecy at all, do you Paul?

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
 
Paul,
You frequently quote from "scriptures" that are now known to be forgeries.

I suggest a very prolonged sabbatical wherein you learn through honest scriptological study just which of those "scriptures" you're fond of quoting from are forgeries.
 
Last edited:
Peregrinus said:
Paul,
You frequently quote from "scriptures" that are now known to be forgeries.

I suggest a very prolonged sabbatical wherein you learn through honest scriptological study just which of those "scriptures" you're fond of quoting from are forgeries.
Click to expand...

Well if they are forgeries then the originals are out there—so do you know where the originals are, as you call those that I refer to as forgeries.

Now there is one thing that cannot be forged and that is the Decalogue- the Ten Commandments.

The Scriptures are based on the Decalogue, so if I build Scripture on the basis of the Decalogue then it can be ascertained what is true and what is a forgery.

The judgement of God was based on the conduct of those who violated the Covenant and the blessing of God was based on the adherence of the Covenant.

So if we only had the Decalogue, we could gauge behaviour from that. The prime factor would be to be truthful and not lie.

Again, if we are judged on the Decalogue and nothing else, as will be the case, then that is a simple mater.

So there are faults in translations, but no forgeries—these have been sifted out.
The NIV that I use in conjunction with many other translations, gives me a clear revelation of the true missive.
 
abaddon said:
You have no prophecy at all, do you Paul?

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Again it must be understood what prophecy is—to say I have no prophecy is incorrect, as prophecy is the proclamation of the Words of the Creator that are compiled in the Bible.
Do I have a prediction in accordance with prophecy—then yes I do.

So in accordance with the prophetic Word of God—I predict that the Kingdom of God will be established here on earth.
 
Paul Bethke said:
Again it must be understood what prophecy is—to say I have no prophecy is incorrect, as prophecy is the proclamation of the Words of the Creator that are compiled in the Bible.
Do I have a prediction in accordance with prophecy—then yes I do.

So in accordance with the prophetic Word of God—I predict that the Kingdom of God will be established here on earth.
Click to expand...
Details Paul. When, how, where, by whom, how will it be identified, etc.

You know, Paul, the kind of detail you are scared to state after your previous track record of abject failure.

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
 
Paul Bethke said:
Well if they are forgeries then the originals are out there—so do you know where the originals are, as you call those that I refer to as forgeries.

Now there is one thing that cannot be forged and that is the Decalogue- the Ten Commandments.

The Scriptures are based on the Decalogue, so if I build Scripture on the basis of the Decalogue then it can be ascertained what is true and what is a forgery.

The judgement of God was based on the conduct of those who violated the Covenant and the blessing of God was based on the adherence of the Covenant.

So if we only had the Decalogue, we could gauge behaviour from that. The prime factor would be to be truthful and not lie.

Again, if we are judged on the Decalogue and nothing else, as will be the case, then that is a simple mater.

So there are faults in translations, but no forgeries—these have been sifted out.
The NIV that I use in conjunction with many other translations, gives me a clear revelation of the true missive.
Click to expand...
What was in the version moses destroyed?

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
 
JayUtah said:
I don't care.
You tell me. You're the prophet.

I noticed that you boldfaced the reference to cowardice. That's fairly hypocritical for someone who got rightly shamed in the Mizvot thread, ran away from it, and hasn't been back since.
Click to expand...
I never ran away from the discussion regarding the 613 Mitsvot—I showed how futile this would be and the time it would take to go through all the 613 Mitvot.
Times and Seasons
107. That the new month shall be solemnly proclaimed as holy, and the months and years shall be calculated by the Supreme Court only (Ex. 12:2) (affirmative) (the authority to declare months is inferred from the use of the word "unto you").
108. Not to travel on Shabbat outside the limits of one's place of residence (Ex. 16:29) (CCN7). SeeShabbat.
109. To sanctify Shabbat (Ex. 20:8) (CCA19). See Shabbat.
110. Not to do work on Shabbat (Ex. 20:10) (CCN6). See Shabbat.
111. To rest on Shabbat (Ex. 23:12; 34:21) (CCA20). See Shabbat.
112. To celebrate the festivals [Passover, Shavu'ot and Sukkot] (Ex. 23:14) (affirmative).
113. To rejoice on the festivals (Deut. 16:14) (CCA21).
114. To appear in the Sanctuary on the festivals (Deut. 16:16) (affirmative).
115. To remove chametz on the Eve of Passover (Ex. 12:15) (CCA22). See Passover.
116. To rest on the first day of Passover (Ex. 12:16; Lev. 23:7) (CCA25). See Passover.
117. Not to do work on the first day of Passover (Ex. 12:16; Lev. 23:6-7) (CCN147). See Passover.
118. To rest on the seventh day of Passover (Ex. 12:16; Lev. 23:8) (CCA27). See Passover.
119. Not to do work on the seventh day of Passover (Ex. 12:16; Lev. 23:8) (CCN148). See Passover.
120. To eat matzah on the first night of Passover (Ex. 12:18) (CCA23). See Passover.
121. That no chametz be in the Israelite's possession during Passover (Ex. 12:19) (CCN3). See Passover.
122. Not to eat any food containing chametz on Passover (Ex. 12:20) (CCN5). See Passover.
123. Not to eat chametz on Passover (Ex. 13:3) (CCN4). See Passover.
124. That chametz shall not be seen in an Israelite's home during Passover (Ex. 13:7) (CCN2). SeePassover.
So again are we to go through each one of these Mitvot?
You tell me. You're the prophet.
Click to expand...
No I do not think it is possible for you to be guilty of such actions.
Rev 21:8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulphur. This is the second death."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom