• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Gable Tostee

The Atheist said:
:dl:

10/10 for consistency.

Overt support for two alpha-male-wannabe defendants.

I sense a pattern.
Click to expand...
The pattern is I called both cases the same as the judges/jury saw them before decisions came down. Pistorius was a gun nut with enough cash to fund his hobby and it got him, Tostee had well defined aspergers which meant his pick up lines got him banned from night clubs, leaving a photo on tinder to do the talking.
Neither planned to kill girls.
 
Samson said:
The pattern is I called both cases the same as the judges/jury saw them before decisions came down. Pistorius was a gun nut with enough cash to fund his hobby and it got him, Tostee had well defined aspergers which meant his pick up lines got him banned from night clubs, leaving a photo on tinder to do the talking.
Neither planned to kill girls.
Click to expand...

As much as you deny it, nothing changes the fact that Pistorius is a murderer.
 
Noztradamus said:
And Gable Tostee has walked from the court without a stain on his character
Click to expand...

Pistorius walked from the court. Initially. Let's see how this works out.

And if you think that the recording doesn't go to Tostee's appalling, misogynist and violent character, you live on a different planet. Without a stain? What a joke.
 
Off topic but saw a bit from his parents.

Bloody nice people. Feel a bit sorry for them too.

(Yes I know they bred the scum)
 
I've seen a few people mention the good character of his parents. I wonder if people base that on how they portray themselves on television.

I hold no opinion on his mother, as I know nothing about her. But his father showed the depth of his character on the night in question. There are no recordings of him suggesting that his moronic offspring call the police, or do anything else in any way responsible. He was all about covering his precious manchild's arse.

I guess some people don't see that.
 
Shiner said:
I've seen a few people mention the good character of his parents. I wonder if people base that on how they portray themselves on television.

I hold no opinion on his mother, as I know nothing about her. But his father showed the depth of his character on the night in question. There are no recordings of him suggesting that his moronic offspring call the police, or do anything else in any way responsible. He was all about covering his precious manchild's arse.

I guess some people don't see that.
Click to expand...
He made him go to the cops in the morning.
 
Shiner said:
Do you have a cite for that? I'm fairly certain that they wenf to the police station after meeting with the lawyer. I suggest that the lawyer is the one who made the decision.
Click to expand...
In that situation I'd make sure the prick had a lawyer as well.

It's still his kid.

Do you think he would just throw him away?
 
cullennz said:
In that situation I'd make sure the prick had a lawyer as well.

It's still his kid.

Do you think he would just throw him away?
Click to expand...

Nope. I think daddy had doubts about little Gabe's story.

That makes no difference to my point. Did dad show any concern for the deceased?

Did Tostee?

Don't cite his "I hope she isn't dead". This degenerate had previously drawn a chalk outline beneath his balcony. 14 floors beneath it. Don't tell me he had any doubts as to the result. He saw the cops. He knew damn well she was dead.

Neither father or son voiced any sympathy or remorse for the victim in the hour or more that they are recorded speaking.
 
lionking said:
Your emotive terminology is telling. And ridiculous.

This jerk is no kid.
Click to expand...
His ****** offspring then.

Doesn't change the point.

When you throw your son out in a messed up time no matter what they may or may not have done get back to me
 
Shiner said:
I would hope that the judges directions to the jury are , or can be, brought into question. Particularly the ones on the balcony not being part of the property
Click to expand...

You've misinterpreted his statement:

The jury - six men and six women - also asked if Tostee putting Wright on his balcony constituted removing her from his property.
..
Justice Byrne's reply was brief.
"Yes," he answered.
Click to expand...

It's the *action* that's at question, not the location. Because he is permitted to perform that action under law.
 
cullennz said:
His ****** offspring then.

Doesn't change the point.

When you throw your son out in a messed up time no matter what they may or may not have done get back to me
Click to expand...

I'll do what is he best for my children, but I will not expect anonymous, ignorant sympathisers on net to call them "kid". I would see it as the emotive rubbish it is.
 
Hard Cheese said:
You've misinterpreted his statement:



It's the *action* that's at question, not the location. Because he is permitted to perform that action under law.
Click to expand...


I beg to differ.

Did this action constitute removing her from the property? Yes.

IOW. After the door was closed, she was deemed to have been removed from the property.
 
lionking said:
I'll do what is he best for my children, but I will not expect anonymous, ignorant sympathisers on net to call them "kid". I would see it as the emotive rubbish it is.
Click to expand...
It is his kid.

I take it you have none

If you did you would know they are always your kid

But point taken.

Tbh I didn't actually use the term for some emotive affect

But see now it could be seen that way.

From now on I'll just call him prick pond spawn
 
lionking said:
I'll do what is he best for my children, but I will not expect anonymous, ignorant sympathisers on net to call them "kid". I would see it as the emotive rubbish it is.
Click to expand...
And please don't be aggresive to me.

I never report anyone because frankly I don't care but personal attacks irritate me
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom