• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 123

The Sun's coronal tail wags its photospheric dog

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-10-sun-coronal-tail-wags-photospheric.html

"We used to think that the surface's magnetic evolution drives solar eruptions. Our new observations suggest that disturbances created in the solar outer atmosphere can also cause direct and significant perturbations on the surface through magnetic fields, a phenomenon not envisioned by any major contemporary solar eruption models. This has immediate and far-reaching implications in understanding energy and momentum transportation in eruptions on the Sun and other stars," Wang said. "We will continue to study, and possibly re-interpret, the relationship between the different layers of the Sun."
Hello cardboard, wake up - you are a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos
Ignorance and gibberish do not explain anything.
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 124

"But a team of NJIT scientists now claims that flares in turn have a powerful impact on sunspots, the visible concentrations of magnetic fields on the sun's surface, or photosphere. In a paper published in Nature Communications this week, the researchers argue that flares cause sunspots to rotate at much faster speeds than are usually observed before they erupt.

Their observations, based on high-resolution images captured through NJIT's 1.6 meter New Solar Telescope (NST) at Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO), come as something of a surprise. The sun's outer layer, or corona, where flares are released, has a plasma density about a hundred million times smaller than that of the photosphere.

"It's analogous to the tail wagging the dog. The lower-density regions are much less energetic and forceful," said Chang Liu, a research professor of physics at NJIT and the principal author of the study, "Flare differentially rotates sunspot on Sun's surface."

"We do think the rotation of sunspots builds up magnetic energy that is released in form of solar flares, but we have also observed conclusively that flares can cause sunspots to rotate about 10 times faster," he added. "This highlights the powerful, magnetic nature of solar flares.""
A Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos needs to learn that lies, ignorance and gibberish does not explain anything.

It is a lie that sunspots are not caused by magnetic fields because we have measured the magnetic fields causing then for decades..
 
Lawrence M. Krauss
A Universe from Nothing

Page: 103

We can thus hope for the effects of kvanttipainovoimaan new physics out of the way of virtual particles that exist "Plancin time" for a shorter period of time. If we take into account only virtual particles of cumulative effects, whose energy is equal to or less than this limit permits, we estimate a finite virtual particles emptiness by giving energy.
However, this is a problem. Estimate turns out to be about 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 times larger than the universe of all the well-known material, including dark matter, energy.

If the calculation of the atom and the virtual particle energy levels slots will be held throughout the best physics conversion calculation, this empty space, energy rating - 120 orders of magnitude greater than the energy of all the other parts of the universe - is without a doubt the worst If the energy of empty space would not be nearly so great, repulsion caused by it (you remember the empty space. matching energy cosmological constant) is sufficient to blow the Earth immediately. In addition, the energy would have been the universe in the early stages so large that all the saw tracks would be ejected apart from each other in the first seconds of the initial explosion in a fraction of no stars, planets or people could never be formed. "

Bills, therefore, show time and again that all matter / energy burst that is indeed expanding all the time again.

Units may not vuan eggs not accept the things !!!

love
1038
:)
 
Exciting. Types are counting ended up the same as I do without mathematics for many time ago.

Why were not able to accept the ongoing explosion of the Earth's own body?

They admittedly did not onesimpleprinciple.com atomic model in which all the time Exploding a condensation recycle all the time explosive energy with each other.

love
1038
:)
 
In 1908 Henri Poincaré presented a significant rate, which in part was based on Darwin's calculations. [42] He concluded that the attraction is proportional to the expression , where S is the molecular surface area, v particle velocity and ρ density of the medium. Like Laplace, he came to the that for the attraction should be proportional to the body mass, S may be more than one kymmenesmiljoonasosa the Earth's surface. On the other hand fluid resistance is proportional to the expression Sρv, and therefore the relationship between the resistance and the tensile force is inversely proportional to the expression of Sv. in order to obtain resistance sufficiently low Poincaré calculated that the particles the speed v should be at least 24 · 1017 times the speed of light. "

https://fi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sagen_gravitaatioteoria

http://onesimpleprinciple.com/ model contains all the background of the extremely fast movement / energy that accelerates the expansion of the universe to appear in the expanding motion / energy.

Love
1038
:)
 
"When there are lower limits Monitoring thus has Sv and v, and the upper limit of the surface area S, may be of help to calculate that the resulting collisions, the amount of heat would be proportional to the expression Sρv3. Calculations show that the Earth's temperature should rise to 1026 degrees Celsius per second. Poincaré pointed out that the country could not very long stay at its present level. "

Why Poincaré did not dare to penetrate further?

He could not understand that the substance consists of a condensation of which are expanding all the time and whose expansion is accelerating all the time, as the movement / energy to crash into the expanding atomic nuclei expanding crystallizations.

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 127

"When there ....
More bad translation and gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

This is the idiocy of thinking that Le Sage's theory of gravitation dating from 1690 is valid or modern physics :jaw-dropp!
Poincare was arguing against the theory!
The calculation shows that earth's temperature would rise by 1026 degrees per second
 
Last edited:
"The calculation shows that earth's temperature would rise by 1026 degrees per second"

Temperature not rise, because Expanding Earth nucleus of atoms expanding all a time and expanding nucleus of atoms also recycling expanding movement / energy together all a time.

And yes, there is all behind extremely fast movement / energy which get expanding movement / energy expanding faster and faster.


Poincare already calculate how fast that all behind movement / energy should be at least!

I know where it coming and why it is so fast!


"On the other hand fluid resistance is proportional to the expression Sρv, and therefore the relationship between the resistance and the tensile force is inversely proportional to the expression of Sv. in order to obtain resistance sufficiently low Poincaré calculated that the particles the speed v should be at least 24 · 1017 times the speed of light. ""


Thats why!

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key: Delusions about Le Sage's theory of gravitation

"The calculation shows that earth's temperature would rise by 1026 degrees per second"
Delusions from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

Any body with a temperature increasing at 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 degrees a second would not exist :jaw-dropp!

No particle with mass can move faster than the speed of light.

Thus Le Sage's theory of gravitation is wrong and it is abysmally ignorant to claim that your fantasies can explain invalid science :eek:!
 
Last edited:
protons and neutrons explode all the time. they circulate throughout the period of explosive movement / energy with each other. push each other away from each other in the same relationship with the expansion. extremely fast all the background movement / energy to maintain a constant visible explosion of an explosive energy of the universe, ie the expansion.

Täts it.

Love
1038
:)
 
"If the calculation of the atom and the virtual particle energy levels slots will be held throughout the best physics conversion calculation, this empty space, energy rating - 120 orders of magnitude greater than the energy of all the other parts of the universe - is without a doubt the worst If the energy of empty space would not be nearly so great, repulsion caused by it (you remember the empty space. matching energy cosmological constant) is sufficient to blow the Earth immediately."

Mathematic rules.

Protons and neutrons sufficient to blow the all the time.

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key: A lie about protons, a fantasy about neutrons

"If the calculation of the atom and the virtual particle energy levels slots will be held throughout the best physics conversion calculation, this empty space, energy rating - 120 orders of magnitude greater than the energy of all the other parts of the universe - is without a doubt the worst If the energy of empty space would not be nearly so great, repulsion caused by it (you remember the empty space. matching energy cosmological constant) is sufficient to blow the Earth immediately."
A lie about protons (they do not decay or explode), a fantasy about neutrons (free neutrons decay), usual gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 128

"If the calculation of the atom and the virtual particle energy levels slots will be held throughout the best physics conversion calculation, this empty space, energy rating - 120 orders of magnitude greater than the energy of all the other parts of the universe - is without a doubt the worst If the energy of empty space would not be nearly so great, repulsion caused by it (you remember the empty space. matching energy cosmological constant) is sufficient to blow the Earth immediately."
Usual ignorance from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos :jaw-dropp!
What he quotes is about dark energy, i.e. "empty space, energy rating", not protons or neutrons.

And the quote seems to lie. The expansion ("repulsion") caused by dark energy currently has no effect on the Earth. There is speculation about a Big Rip happening sometime in the future.
 
There is people who say, space expanding.

They lie. It is a lie.

Nobody cant see space.

Space dont emit information.

You cant proof that space expanding.

You can say, there is god.

But it is not science.

It is religion.

We can see how material expanding very very fast. Supernovas and nucleus bomb, you know.

So, when i say, protons and neutrons expanding all a time and recycling expanding movement / energy with eachother, it is science.

It is science because we can try proof, protons and neutrons expanding or not.

Maybe protons and neutrons dont expanding or maybe expanding.

If all quarks, neutrinos, photons etc. Expanding all a time, i can explain how and why.

Nobody cant explain how space expanding and why!!!

If somebody say, they can explain that, they lie!!!

Love
1038
:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom