• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Project Veritas strikes again / More evidence...

Statistics are not "lionization", those are simple facts quoted directly from Wikipedia.

You were kissing the butt of Pravda.

You cited an Pravda article in order to support your arguments, and
then you cited data to support Pravda, and
you never did try to correct your posting about Pravda.
 
In fairness, Komsomolskaya Pravda is a different publication than Pravda. Similar in tone and content, but a different publication.
 
Because he took down ACORN

He didn't "take down" ACORN. He created a video in which an employee played along with O'Keefe long enough to report him. When O'Keefe edited the video to make it like the guy was trying to run a scam, he was fired and then sued O'Keefe. O'Keefe settled and admitted he defamed an innocent man.

GOP operatives took the "controversy" O'Keefe created to kill ACORN by a thousand paper cuts. Governors and elgislators launched "investigations" that were too much for ACORN to keep up with.

and I doubt the context you are suggesting, but I'm certainly open to seeing what you have on it. Does it compare to what all the big media outlets do?

The closest the "mainstream" media has come in my memory is when Dateline did that piece about SUVs and doctored one to flip over and start on fire. A bunch of people were fired and NBC is still recovering from it.
 
I'm confused.

This guy may be scam artist, but what the hell could he have edited out that would have softened any of the things recorded?

Did they say 'just kidding' after each sentence?

Also this fit the pattern of "violence breaking out at Trum Ralleys" that almost always seem to involve agitators coming there to provoke a reaction.

I'm sure the guy is a douche and the video's style and manipulative editing don't inspire confidence. But he did get those people on camera admitting to running organisations indirectly financed by the DNC paying and directing agitators.

Do the people on this forum have a similar 'meh, who cares' reaction to the government agent provocateurs who made anti-war protests go violent during the Vietnam era? Would they react this disinterested if it was a pro Trump org provoking pro Hillary people ?
 
Last edited:
Now that I'm back home and can see the video... this one is different than the one I'd recently seen so I can't comment yet on this latest one till I finish.
 
I'm confused.

This guy may be scam artist, but what the hell could he have edited out that would have softened any of the things recorded?

Did they say 'just kidding' after each sentence?

Also this fit the pattern of "violence breaking out at Trum Ralleys" that almost always seem to involve agitators coming there to provoke a reaction.

I'm sure the guy is a douche and the video's style and manipulative editing don't inspire confidence. But he did get those people on camera admitting to running organisations indirectly financed by the DNC paying and directing agitators.

Do the people on this forum have a similar 'meh, who cares' reaction to the government agent provocateurs who made anti-war protests go violent during the Vietnam era? Would they react this disinterested if it was a pro Trump org provoking pro Hillary people ?

If someone can get some supporting evidence, that would be one thing. But this guys has been busted for editing and fabricating "proof" every. single. time.

If you really want to trust this guy's videos, you might also be a "proud" Trump "University" "graduate"
 
I'm confused.

This guy may be scam artist, but what the hell could he have edited out that would have softened any of the things recorded?

Did they say 'just kidding' after each sentence?

Also this fit the pattern of "violence breaking out at Trum Ralleys" that almost always seem to involve agitators coming there to provoke a reaction.

I'm sure the guy is a douche and the video's style and manipulative editing don't inspire confidence. But he did get those people on camera admitting to running organisations indirectly financed by the DNC paying and directing agitators.

Do the people on this forum have a similar 'meh, who cares' reaction to the government agent provocateurs who made anti-war protests go violent during the Vietnam era? Would they react this disinterested if it was a pro Trump org provoking pro Hillary people ?



I've already posted upthread about some of the manipulation that I could detect on a single viewing.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11543848&postcount=19
 
Last edited:
I'm confused.

This guy may be scam artist, but what the hell could he have edited out that would have softened any of the things recorded?

Did they say 'just kidding' after each sentence?

Also this fit the pattern of "violence breaking out at Trum Ralleys" that almost always seem to involve agitators coming there to provoke a reaction.

I'm sure the guy is a douche and the video's style and manipulative editing don't inspire confidence. But he did get those people on camera admitting to running organisations indirectly financed by the DNC paying and directing agitators.

Do the people on this forum have a similar 'meh, who cares' reaction to the government agent provocateurs who made anti-war protests go violent during the Vietnam era? Would they react this disinterested if it was a pro Trump org provoking pro Hillary people ?

I have a "meh" reaction to people who go to protests, say awful but legal things, trying to get punched. If they threw the first punch then I have a problem.
 
Bill Clinton sex scandal? ********.
Hillary Clinton emails? ********.
Hillary Clinton deleted emails? All personal.
Rigging the election? ********, I don't like the journalist. There is a video. It's fake.

Is this forum for skeptics or non-skeptics-at-all?

You believe exactly what the big press tells you lol. It's so ridiculous to see. I really hope she wins. 10 years from now you'll see who you really elected. I'd love to see, it will be a scandal per week, but who cares? At least she's not Trump.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom