• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, considering the you unilaterally declared certain evidence non-substantive, it is a bit silly, huh?

Skeptic: the emails show that in private Hillary unabashedly sucked up to Wall Street while claiming that she was going to crack down on Wall Street.

Head in sand response: I said not mention how she panders to groups! Thus No Evidence.

'k.

This thread is about Hilary Clinton being "done (for)". The performance of her only (for want of a better word) "credible" opponent is key to this.

She has flaws, many of which have been investigated for the last 25-years. Her flaws are significantly less important than Trump's and the opinion polls suggest that most of the US public agree.

At least one journalist is saying that the two worst stories about Trump haven't yet hit.
 
Well, considering the you unilaterally declared certain evidence non-substantive, it is a bit silly, huh?

If I ask for evidence of bigfoot that doesn't consist of just hearsay and unsubstantiated eye witness accounts is that unilaterally declaring certain evidence non-substantive or just setting expectations?

If you want to post about her pant suits that's fine, slings will likely help out. Maybe make some fat jokes and photoshop some pictures for you. All good. Just not all that substantive.

Skeptic: the emails show that in private Hillary unabashedly sucked up to Wall Street while claiming that she was going to crack down on Wall Street.

If that is there let's see it. What I've seen so far isn't nearly that clear, but maybe you can sway me.
 
If that is there let's see it. What I've seen so far isn't nearly that clear, but maybe you can sway me.

:eek:

That email has been linked and addressed for the last week in this thread. I am a bit amazed that you appear to be claiming you are unfamiliar with it.
 
:eek:

That email has been linked and addressed for the last week in this thread. I am a bit amazed that you appear to be claiming you are unfamiliar with it.

I don't click on every link in every thread. Care to give the money quote? The one sentence that will make everyone rethink if this person could ever be qualified to be president. You know, something that will grab me by the pussy.
 
Well, considering the you unilaterally declared certain evidence non-substantive, it is a bit silly, huh?

Skeptic: the emails show that in private Hillary unabashedly sucked up to Wall Street while claiming that she was going to crack down on Wall Street.

Head in sand response: I said not mention how she panders to groups! Thus No Evidence.

'k.

Most often when you say "evidence" you're referring to innuendo. They're not the same thing. There's no evidence that Clinton actually did anything much wrong. At the end of the day, the standard GOP smear tactics will fail -- and the day is ending pretty soon now.

Of course Clinton has her battle scars -- she's been under the microscope as a working politician for many years. During those years, Trump was mostly humored as a clown. We'll be seeing the difference this makes in due course.
 
Of course Clinton has her battle scars -- she's been under the microscope as a working politician for many years. .

Sorry, Clinton has been under far more than the microscope as a working politician.

She has been the direct target of the right wing for almost 25 years. They have been going at her as hard as they can, reaching for everything. She hasn't gotten the politician treatment. She has gotten the Satanist treatment.

That she is still viable shows how strong she is. A lesser person (coughTrumpcough) would have melted decades ago.

Look at Trump now - he gets a little heat and he melts like a gummy in the pizza oven. But this is the kind of scrutiny that Clinton has put up with for 20 years.
 
Religious Leaders slam Clinton over email
http://us.cnn.com/2016/10/13/politi...hillary-clinton-campaign-wikileaks/index.html

Catholic and evangelical groups slammed Hillary Clinton's campaign in a statement Thursday over comments revealed in the WikiLeaks emails hack between two high-level campaign officials.

Dozens of religious leaders who signed the statement expressed their "outrage at the demeaning and troubling rhetoric used by those within Secretary Clinton's campaign."

The statement is referring to a 2011 email between campaign chairman John Podesta, whose email was hacked, and communications director Jennifer Palmieri and John Halpin, a senior fellow at the liberal think tank Center for American Progress.
 
Religious Leaders slam Clinton over email
http://us.cnn.com/2016/10/13/politi...hillary-clinton-campaign-wikileaks/index.html

Catholic and evangelical groups slammed Hillary Clinton's campaign in a statement Thursday over comments revealed in the WikiLeaks emails hack between two high-level campaign officials.
Looks like bollocks to me.

In the email, Halpin writes that 21st Century Fox Chairman Rupert Murdoch and NewsCorp Chairman Robert Thomson, who are both Catholic, are attracted to the faith because of "systemic thought and severely backward gender relations."


Palmieri responded: "I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable, politically conservative religion -- their rich friends wouldn't understand if they became evangelical."
Halpin and Palmieri, not Clinton, and it's about Murdoch (a lowlife sleazebag) and Robert Thompson, not the Catholic faith or evangelism. Remember, Murdoch changed his nationality for business reasons. There's no reason to think he doesn't choose his purported faith according to a similar calculation.

Fake outrage and no story. Moving right along ...
 
Dozens of religious leaders who signed the statement expressed their "outrage at the demeaning and troubling rhetoric used by those within Secretary Clinton's campaign."

Let me get this straight... these bible thumpers are outraged at the demeaning rhetoric coming from... Clinton??

This is satire, right?
 
This thread is about Hilary Clinton being "done (for)". The performance of her only (for want of a better word) "credible" opponent is key to this.

She has flaws, many of which have been investigated for the last 25-years. Her flaws are significantly less important than Trump's and the opinion polls suggest that most of the US public agree.

At least one journalist is saying that the two worst stories about Trump haven't yet hit.
The guy is a known horndog, I'm sure there is tape out there as bad or worse than pussygate. It's just a matter of timing, what release date would provide the maximum effect.
 
I don't click on every link in every thread. Care to give the money quote? The one sentence that will make everyone rethink if this person could ever be qualified to be president. You know, something that will grab me by the pussy.

This.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom