• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump runs for POTUS/ Trumped Up! Part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
In case anyone is interested, here is a good consolidation of all the public sexual molestation charges that have been made against Trump this far:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto...ault_allegations_the_floodgates_are_open.html

The Floodgates Are Open on Trump Sexual Assault Allegations

…

Now, new accusers are coming forward with accounts of Trump’s sexual misconduct, some saying they are infuriated by his denials. …

… Still others are making full-fledged allegations of sexual assault against Trump. Below is a list of the women who have so far accused Trump—if we’ve missed any, tell us in the comments.

…

It seems more likely that more Trump stories are going to come out, and that these stories will continue to portray a man accustomed to abusing his power. “I was so upset that he thought I was so insignificant that he could do that,” Crooks told theNew York Times.

If and when new allegations come out, we will update this list.
 
"They let you do it."

Did I get the quote right? I'm too lazy to look it up again.


For some reason I'm reminded of a quote from Life of Brian:

Mother: [Your father] was a Centurion in the Roman army.

Brian: You mean you were raped?

Mother: Well at first, yes...


For another reason, I suspect that joke wouldn't fly so well these days.
 
And if I held a knife to your throat would you accept my excuse of "He let me do it"?

You don't need a knife.

In my experience men are often getting convicted of sexual abuse for unwanted touching when all the girl did was to say "no". Sometimes not even that.

The basic point of consent is that you shouldn't assume that the object of your attention will welcome your hands upon him/her. In the case of a situation of dependency it's even more important to get proper consent.

Trump doesn't care about that. Women are there to be ogled and touched for his pleasure.
 
And if I held a knife to your throat would you accept my excuse of "He let me do it"?


No. That would not be the same. But what does that have to do with Trump? Are you saying being a rich celebrity is like holding a knife to someone's throat?
 
Look, you don't even have to buy the idea that some women would be attracted to Trump because he's a rich celebrity. All you have to accept is that Trump thinks this is true. That's all that's needed to explain the remarks.
 
The liberal left is mired in hypocrisy; on the one-hand, they've been saying that Trump is "all talk, no action," yet they keep bringing up these women he's sexually assaulted.
It's so unfair, isn't it? Trump tries to find common ground by agreeing he's all talk, and the left changes its story. There's no working with these people; it's just obstructionism for the sake of it.
 
No. That would not be the same. But what does that have to do with Trump? Are you saying being a rich celebrity is like holding a knife to someone's throat?

Actually, coercion doesn't have to be physical. When someone is rich and powerful, he can control and intimidate without threatening violence. Cosby's accusers mostly didn't speak out at the time because he was an international celebrity and they were nobodies. Are young women -- in some cases teenagers -- supposed to sue or even file criminal complaints against a (purported) billionaire who is also notoriously litigious? As Trump himself said, "You can do anything." Money can be sharper than a kitchen knife.
 
Look, you don't even have to buy the idea that some women would be attracted to Trump because he's a rich celebrity. All you have to accept is that Trump thinks this is true. That's all that's needed to explain the remarks.

And if the remarks were all we had to determine Trump's behavior, then you'd have a point.

But we also numerous claims of Trump sexually assaulting women. Some describing exactly the kind of behavior to which Trump himself admitted.
 
Actually, coercion doesn't have to be physical. When someone is rich and powerful, he can control and intimidate without threatening violence. Cosby's accusers mostly didn't speak out at the time because he was an international celebrity and they were nobodies. Are young women -- in some cases teenagers -- supposed to sue or even file criminal complaints against a (purported) billionaire who is also notoriously litigious? As Trump himself said, "You can do anything." Money can be sharper than a kitchen knife.

There ought to be some way for the rich and powerful to tell the difference between consent and coercion, or maybe there isn't?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom