• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't think so.

she also told Wall Street that she needed Wall Street to get elected and that Wall Street should police itself.

Something tells me that we are going to get a whole lot of sarcastic bs in response.

Although the she lies to everyone is an interesting approach.

Fantastic.
 
Didn't think so.

she also told Wall Street that she needed Wall Street to get elected and that Wall Street should police itself.

Something tells me that we are going to get a whole lot of sarcastic bs in response.

Although the she lies to everyone is an interesting approach.

Fantastic.

She told them that she says what she has to say to various groups. And you accept that as gospel? You think she lies about everything, except when she's confessing to lying? You seem to miss the point that what she was saying to that audience was probably expediency, she told them that she does it all the time as other politicians do, and because you find a way to cherry-pick something in it, you have decided that "oh, this time she's telling the truth when she says she needs Wall Street". Four hours earlier was she telling the truth when she said she needed the black evangelical vote?

By your standards, and by the Cockwork Orange's, she lies about everything yet you quote her words as gospel.

Good luck with that. No one's buying the Casablanca Denial. It just doesn't have the staying power of pussy-grabbing. Not a damned thing in this cache of releases, just showing "politics as usual" is going to have the "that done her in" effect.

But you keep trying. As I've already predicted, you'll have a nice long "It's Time To Impeach Hillary" thread; it's just a question of whether you wait until she's actually in office or if you get with your legal consultants of sunmaster, dewey, cheatham and how and invent some legal basis for Pre-Impeachment.
 
Various groups: The public in public speeches.

And then she reassures Wall Street insiders in Wall Street private speeches that she needs them and that she had to have a public position and a private position.

At this point I can only assume that her fans have not actually bothered to read anything and are openly making up excuses for her despicable two faced antics.

Type clockwork orange again.
 
Various groups: The public in public speeches.

And then she reassures Wall Street insiders in Wall Street private speeches that she needs them and that she had to have a public position and a private position.

At this point I can only assume that her fans have not actually bothered to read anything and are openly making up excuses for her despicable two faced antics.

Type clockwork orange again.

Hey, Bernie, is that you? "Private Speeches"? Technically, yes. But there were a whole lof of attendees. I know you're trying to make it into Romney's 47% comment but this wasn't even close to a conspiracy or cabal. People attending didn't even Tweet her portions because she said or did nothing to interest anyone. She was boring, according to a number of sources.

If any of those people attending had anything other to say than "Uh, yeah, I was there but I can't remember anything she said, frankly", it'd be out there. And the best you can come up with is that she admitted to tailoring comments to a particular constituency in order to build coalitions. That's the gist of her comment.

And as I've said, no one's buying this big smoking-nitpick or the Casablanca Denial. That orange thing stood there and tried to defend saying one thing in private and another in public. Or did you miss that? Her comments amount to "Hey, politics is a pragmatic business." His comments/denials as in his denials of his bigot-pandering amount to "Hey, I like to be a douchebag sometimes sorry if you caught me at it."
 
Last edited:
Nope. I'm content to let you flop around on the beach like a barramundi with a hook in its mouth.

Personally, I think it's that public school education you got in Illinois. "Honest Abe", my ass. (In Louisiana they taught us that Huey Long was a fine upstanding man who had only the greater good for the people in his heart.)

I think Lincoln was our greatest President. But I have no delusions that he was above politics and pragmatism. The very fact that he had to walk that tightrope to get things done is what makes him great. Just as Johnson promised anything to the southern wing in '65, then unleashed Hubert on the Senate floor. That's what being a leader is all about.

Trump: "I will not lie to you!" What a crock. He lies to himself when he gets up and adjusts his fake hair, puts on his girdle and checks his orange-in-a-bottle skin regimen. He lies when he says he's successful. He lies when he says he's seen things on film that don't exist. The irony of this buffoon calling up "Honest Abe. He never told a lie." is beyond the pale.

I really like this post. It's too bad that few people know history. Linoln frequently talked out of bother sides of his mouth. He was in the true sense of the word a politician who tried to appeal to both sides of slavery.
 
It is baffling to me that people are missing the fact that she was reasuring Wall Street insiders

Wall
Street
Insiders

That she was saying one thing in public and telling them Wall Street insiders the truth.

Indefensible, except for her supporters. And to drag down Lincoln with her?

Despicable.

Doesn't matter what she said.

The alternative is admittedly guilty of sexual assault, of working with Russians in collusion to affect the outcome of the election, and is threatening to jail his political opponents.

Only dictators do that, kiddo. ONLY DICTATORS.

If you want a dictator, move to an appropriate country. I suggest something in Africa.
 
And, as I wrote a while ago and was so perfectly ilustrated by catsmate above, to trust anything that comes from wikileaks is to waddle in russian propaganda. Of course some of the emails can and probably are real, but who is going to decide which is which before the elections?
Trump obviously took a bait already, peddling an obviously forged email. I'm sure that the Big Dog was very carefully vetting his selection of emails.
 
Finally, something we can all agree on:

Oh no, a woman in her late 60s has trouble getting up a flight of stairs once.

Time to call it quits! :rolleyes:

I wonder who Monica Lewinsky is voting for?

Bwa ha ha ha! You guys are so hilarious. That is literally the only thing you have left as ammo against her: her husband cheated on her in the office. That is so weak and pathetic. How do you find the courage to post here again, I wonder?
 

Oh man, you do know that old Kurt is not claiming that the emails were edited, but rather that they were misinterpreted by a media outfit called Sputnik?

Did you actually even try to read the article or the email or the raw source?

Glen Caplin, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, did not dispute the authenticity of the emails, which were believed to have been obtained by hackers who breached Mr. Podesta’s account. But he assailed Mr. Trump’s campaign for praising their release.

your conspiracy theory is not today's talking point, please stop contaminating the thread with bad information.

Thanks.
 
Not in a marriage, although it used to, but it'd be weird to call the leader of the country "Mrs" as if her husband is the real president.
"Mrs" derives from Mistress of the House, a position of some authority and status, often symbolised by the keys she traditionally held - to everything but the cash-box, naturally. Mrs President will be Mistress of the White House. Works for me. :)
 
Why? To read the finest of russian propaganda tampering with emails and their big dog, of course!

Guys, open your emails from correct the record, today's talking point is that the emails are not "harmful"

The "tampering" conspiracy theory was dropped a couple of days ago!

Get with the Program, Shillaries!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom