• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Megalodon said:
From the moment that a previous batch of emails showed signs of tampering in russian computers, any further release of emails is not to be taken seriously.
The die-hard Hillary haters won't understand why not, but rational people will see it clearly.
Click to expand...

curiously tho the mutts at the campaign can easily prove it fake by releasing emails or the actual transcripts of the speech.

they have not done so, so they are obviously lying.

I see correct the record got their talking points out, as frivolous as they are.
 
The Big Dog said:
curiously tho the mutts at the campaign can easily prove it fake by releasing emails or the actual transcripts of the speech.

they have not done so, so they are obviously lying.

I see correct the record got their talking points out, as frivolous as they are.
Click to expand...

Wrong again.

Trump can prove he's a successful businessman who gives to charities, pays his taxes but releasing his tax returns. Trump can also prove he changed his ways since the Billy Bush incident by releasing all the audio and video from The Apprentice.

He can prove he doesn't sexually harass his employees by releasing them from their Non Disclosure Agreements.
 
The Big Dog said:
curiously tho the mutts at the campaign can easily prove it fake by releasing emails or the actual transcripts of the speech.

they have not done so, so they are obviously lying.

I see correct the record got their talking points out, as frivolous as they are.
Click to expand...

In quite the same deranged logic, Trump didn't release his tax returns, so he must be a criminal tax evader.
 
Megalodon said:
In quite the same deranged logic, Trump didn't release his tax returns, so he must be a criminal tax evader.
Click to expand...

Well, that is obviously a false analogy, but lets run with it.

Yes Trump is a criminal tax evader or something.

And Hillary has lied about every and anything she claims to stand for and belongs in prison.

we agree!
 
The Big Dog said:
lolz, cripes do you really have nothing but a Bu-trump response?

*********** worthless
Click to expand...

Sadly the attacks on Hillary are obvious deflections from Trump's abominable behavior. A pathetic attempt at drawing some kind of moral equivalency. As if a woman defending her husband somehow is as bad as "grabbing women by the pussy"

There is no equivalency. Trump is a pervert and a predator. Hillary was loyal to her husband against attacks. Hardly comparable. The argument is beyond pathetic. It's desperate. It's a Pee Wee Herman argument.
 
Considering that the post-Bush tape Clinton attacks are about as incomprehensive as they are voluminous and that they are the product of just a few people, then I expect that what some of these attackers actually want is a bit of corporal punishment from Madam President.
 
The Big Dog said:
Well, that is obviously a false analogy, but lets run with it.

Yes Trump is a criminal tax evader or something.

And Hillary has lied about every and anything she claims to stand for and belongs in prison.

we agree!
Click to expand...

You suck at this... lying isn't illegal. You lose.
 
The Big Dog said:
lolz, Trump is bad and as such we can't talk about Clinton?

what an insipid position.

such passes for skepticism around here these days...

smfh
Click to expand...

It is insipid to suggest that Hillary defending her husband against non-stop mostly fabricated attacks by his political opposition disqualifies her to be President when her opposition gropes women at every opportunity and brags about it.

For years I've read fabricated stories about Hillary and Bill Clinton most of which were published and promoted by Trump's advisors in this election. Maybe there are snippets of truth in some of these articles, but time and time again I've found them to be mostly false. Considering this 40 year war that people like Bannon have waged against her husband, I doubt one could fairly criticize her for attacking those that attack her.
 
The Big Dog said:
*CLINTON ADMITS SHE IS OUT OF TOUCH*
*CLINTON REMARKS ARE PRO KEYSTONE AND PRO TRADE*
*CLINTON SAYS YOU NEED TO HAVE A PRIVATE AND PUBLIC POSITION ON POLICY*
*CLINTON TALKS ABOUT HOLDING WALL STREET ACCOUNTABLE ONLY FOR POLITICAL REASONS*
*CLINTON SUGGESTS WALL STREET INSIDERS ARE WHAT IS NEEDED TO FIX WALL STREET*
*CLINTON ADMITS NEEDING WALL STREET FUNDING*
*CLINTON TOUTS HER RELATIONSHIP TO WALL STREET AS A SENATOR*
*CLINTON SUGGESTS SHE IS A MODERATE*
*CLINTON TALKS ABOUT THE CHALLENGES RUNNING FOR OFFICE*
*CLINTON IS AWARE OF SECURITY CONCERNS AROUND BLACKBERRIES*
*CLINTON IS MORE FAVORABLE TO CANADIAN HEALTH CARE AND SINGLE PAYER*
Click to expand...
Wow, that all seems really... um...

What's the opposite of damning?
 
The Big Dog said:
yes, it is, in fact. you really did not know that, huh?

Hillary 2016!
Click to expand...

You think that lying is illegal?
Well, I have news for you... lying is absolutely legal. If it weren't, there wouldn't be provisions to make it illegal under particularly well determined situations.

But you are right, 2016 is Hillary's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom