What evidence do you expect? It's almost always going to be a "he said, she said" situation which is not enough to prosecute. We do have evidence of course that Bill Clinton is perfectly willing to lie under oath about his sexual indiscretions, as well as suborn perjury about the same. If he was willing to do that for legal actions, why wouldn't he be willing to do that about illegal actions?
Well, he was certainly bragging, either for entertainment value or to make himself look more powerful. When he does that regarding his business acumen, most people take it with a grain of salt. Although I'm inclined to believe he has sexually assaulted women in the past, I don't believe it any more because of that video tape than I did before.
As always, there's a difference between tu quoque and evidence of hypocrisy. I am not defending Trump; I am attacking Democratic hypocrisy. And I think Republicans may be better served to circle the wagons rather than jump ship. Of course, because of the mainstream media bias, it might not be a practical strategy to circle the wagons. This story is dominating the press, while, at the same time, the continuing revelations of FBI and White House collusion with the Clinton campaign to quash the email investigation has been utterly ignored.
