Trump could win presidency: Yes or No?

[PartSkeptic]

(snip) every says and does, and can never admit he was wrong or made a mistake is a Good Thing?????
Your inability to see the deep flaws in Trump is truly amazing.

It seems Trump has just apologized.

Flaws in Trump. He is human. Show me some-one who has not made mistakes in their life.

As some on this site have pointed out, even Jesus had his faults.

Go on - let the poster who is without mistake or a moment of temper, crudeness or stupidity cast the first (or subsequent) post.

The flaw I hate most is deception used to take unjust advantage of others.

Would any of you vote in JFK or Bill Clinton again, knowing their sexual weakness, flaws and downright abuse of women?

My criteria would be a matter of "Who would do what I think would be right for the country as a whole?"

Are American women unable to say "No!"? How many women are unfaithful? Or are they all paragons of virtue to be put on pedestals and worshiped. How many of the female stars on the movie screen first had to pass the "casting couch" test?

I knew an engineer who used to pose as a famous photographer in order to seduce women. He kept a scrapbook of all his "conquests". He said that hardly any of them could resist the lure of potential stardom, and he had sex with all sorts. (And I think his wife knew about his "hobby".) Who is using who?

 

[NoahFence]

Too funny

 

[MikeG]

........The flaw I hate most is deception used to take unjust advantage of others.........

But you're not quite so bothered about sexual assault to take unjust advantage over others, evidently.

Is there anything this man could say or do which would have you question his fitness for high public office? Anything at all?

 

[Ladewig]

The flaw I hate most is deception used to take unjust advantage of others.

[cough]Trump University[/cough]

ETA
"I can't release my tax return because it is being audited"


................
MORE ETA
aside. Dante classified deceiving others to take advantage of them as more despicable than some violent crimes when he wrote about the nine levels of hell.

 

[jimbob]

But you're not quite so bothered about sexual assault to take unjust advantage over others, evidently.

Is there anything this man could say or do which would have you question his fitness for high public office? Anything at all?

How about the fact that Russia has made a formal complaint to the UN over a speech attacking Trump?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-complaint-to-the-un-over-speech-criticising/

Mr Churkin angrily protested at two speeches by Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, the UN commissioner on human rights, that denounced “demagogues” and specifically targeted Mr Trump and several populist leaders in Europe.

A senior UN diplomat said Mr Churkin specifically “condemned the fact that Zeid mentioned Trump”.

The Clinton camp must feel like kids being let into a well-stocked sweetshop and told to take as much as they like.

 

[Tero]

Time for a Trump is done thread. Of course, we don't want him to resign, just limp to the election.

 

[Frank Newgent]

It seems Trump has just apologized.

Flaws in Trump. He is human. Show me some-one who has not made mistakes in their life.

As some on this site have pointed out, even Jesus had his faults.

Go on - let the poster who is without mistake or a moment of temper, crudeness or stupidity cast the first (or subsequent) post.

The flaw I hate most is deception used to take unjust advantage of others.

Would any of you vote in JFK or Bill Clinton again, knowing their sexual weakness, flaws and downright abuse of women?

My criteria would be a matter of "Who would do what I think would be right for the country as a whole?"

Are American women unable to say "No!"? How many women are unfaithful? Or are they all paragons of virtue to be put on pedestals and worshiped. How many of the female stars on the movie screen first had to pass the "casting couch" test?

I knew an engineer who used to pose as a famous photographer in order to seduce women. He kept a scrapbook of all his "conquests". He said that hardly any of them could resist the lure of potential stardom, and he had sex with all sorts. (And I think his wife knew about his "hobby".) Who is using who?

Is that like Charles Manson’s fiancée only wanting him for his corpse?

 

[Foolmewunz]

It seems Trump has just apologized.


As some on this site have pointed out, even Jesus had his faults.

Go on - let the poster who is without mistake or a moment of temper, crudeness or stupidity cast the first (or subsequent) post.

Say, ye-es! Somebody gimme an "amen". Can a brother get an amen, here? (You do realize that most members here are atheists or agnostics, right?)


I think the quote was "Let he who has not grabbed a pussy cast the first ballot."

 

[Aardvark422]

Party of Family Values.

 

[fuelair]

Time for a Trump is done thread. Of course, we don't want him to resign, just limp to the election.

Very correct, give the republickers no chance at all!!!!!

 

[phiwum]

Very correct, give the republickers no chance at all!!!!!

Haw, haw! Republickers! My, but that's funny!

Or, we could show respect to the respectable persons who have genuine political disagreements with us. I'm not speaking about genuine Trump supporters, but about thoughtful conservatives. They exist (sorry, for the young crowd, I should say, "that's a thing." But I won't).

 

[fuelair]

Haw, haw! Republickers! My, but that's funny!

Or, we could show respect to the respectable persons who have genuine political disagreements with us. I'm not speaking about genuine Trump supporters, but about thoughtful conservatives. They exist (sorry, for the young crowd, I should say, "that's a thing." But I won't).

I do not know of any thoughtful conservative Republicans. Those who were died out in the 80's when the party sold it's soul to fundamentalist xtians and later also those who would become the Tea Baggers. There are no Republicans anymore.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

At this point, I think the poll is missing an obvious option: "Snorting Laughter".

 

[angrysoba]

isn't the Electoral College vote the one that really counts?

Well, yes. Yes, it is. Do you know what it is and what it means?

 

[angrysoba]

It seems Trump has just apologized.

Flaws in Trump. He is human. Show me some-one who has not made mistakes in their life.

As some on this site have pointed out, even Jesus had his faults.

Go on - let the poster who is without mistake or a moment of temper, crudeness or stupidity cast the first (or subsequent) post.

The flaw I hate most is deception used to take unjust advantage of others.

Would any of you vote in JFK or Bill Clinton again, knowing their sexual weakness, flaws and downright abuse of women?

My criteria would be a matter of "Who would do what I think would be right for the country as a whole?"

Are American women unable to say "No!"? How many women are unfaithful? Or are they all paragons of virtue to be put on pedestals and worshiped. How many of the female stars on the movie screen first had to pass the "casting couch" test?

I knew an engineer who used to pose as a famous photographer in order to seduce women. He kept a scrapbook of all his "conquests". He said that hardly any of them could resist the lure of potential stardom, and he had sex with all sorts. (And I think his wife knew about his "hobby".) Who is using who?

Assuming you mean to vote for Trump, what would change your mind?

What would be something about Trump that would mean you could not vote for him?

Just curious...

 

[Garrison]

Well, yes. Yes, it is. Do you know what it is and what it means?

It's a complex system but I believe it can be boiled down to; 'Trump has no ******* chance'.

 

[angrysoba]

It's a complex system but I believe it can be boiled down to; 'Trump has no ******* chance'.

It's not that complex actually. But many people still have no idea about it.

 

[davefoc]

I'm just joining this thread. A lot has gone on since this thread started. Right now it looks like Trump's chances have fallen to single digits. One would think that trying to do business with Castro while he was claiming that was a bad thing would be enough to put his Florida chance in the pretty low range.

And the audio where he bragged about getting away with assaulting women was just released yesterday. I would think that was not a good thing for his already low chances. I'm still a little unsure of this but it appears that somebody I know who has regularly posted pro-Trump stuff seems to have taken down his Trump posts after the Trump's bragging about sexually assaulting women story broke.

Still there are a lot of reasons why people were supporting Trump and those reasons haven't gone away. And there is the constant drumbeat about Clitnn's miscellaneous foibles (made up and real) and maybe something could pop there so Trump's chances seem to still be non-zero.

My question is how were there ever 30 people on this forum that Trump had a 100% chance of winning? Really? Why? It's been pretty well understood for awhile that he is a race baiting grifter that has left a strong of failed businesses and scams in his wake and that he is a sexist ******* that had probably sexually assaulted women (this was known to be very likely the case even before the recent revelations). Didn't one of those 30 people think that some of that might pose some kind of stumbling block for his election? Did they have any concerns that Trump has been on both sides of many major issues and that there was plenty of video of that available which would make him out to look like a flaming hypocrite?

 

[Childlike Empress]

My question is how were there ever 30 people on this forum that Trump had a 100% chance of winning? Really? Why?

That poll is stoopit and invalid without a Planet X option anyway. Likely some "subversives" voted for the first option for the LULZ. I'll vote after election day and will be right.

 

[LSSBB]

That poll is stoopit and invalid without a Planet X option anyway. Likely some "subversives" voted for the first option for the LULZ. I'll vote after election day and will be right.

Possibly correct. Poll is invalid, that's why I did not vote in it. I could have voted lulz, and I would have just hated myself for it.