• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Presidential Debates

I posted before seeing your response.



I was looking at it as an opening bid for discussions rather than a hill to die on.

Wait. I want to change my response to I was being sarcastic. [stagewhisper]I really wasn't.[/stagewhisper]



OK.
Based on my last post, let's start with 33% because neither party is proposing anything less.

I don't care what interests you have in tax returns. My sole fight is against the nebulous concept of fair share.
 
Yes keep crying about the debate being rigged. It makes me happy. :)

As for Trump's response, all I can say is that for a guy who bills himself as a man tougher than any president since Reagan he sure whines a great deal.
 
I said the poll was rigged,

Yes, cry about polls that say your "leader" got destroyed.

and that Lester Holt shamelessly carried Hillary's water and manged to lie to the American public in the process.

Stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional so it is your "leader" who was the liar. Poor Donald, getting called out for proposing laws that are unconstitutional and then lying about it.
 
You might! You might not! You are the one claiming he doesn't pay his fair share without defining a share. I don't do things on my gut. I will take a definition for share you propose. But you have to be ready for the numbers to possibly conclude he pays his share and you do not.
I highlighted the right wing slogan you are repeating.

"Obscene profits" are attacked with the same slogan.

The slogan works to deflect from the issue, a barrier to communication.

I'm not going to get into your off topic debate here.

Billionaires, even faux billionaires paying no Federal Income Taxes are not paying enough. How much they should be paying is a different conversation and your slogan suggesting I cannot say zero is not enough without saying what is enough is nonsense.
 
Yes, cry about polls that say your "leader" got destroyed.

Stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional so it is your "leader" who was the liar. Poor Donald, getting called out for proposing laws that are unconstitutional and then lying about it.

False! Wow, Holt snookered you too?
 
I highlighted the right wing slogan you are repeating.

"Obscene profits" are attacked with the same slogan.

The slogan works to deflect from the issue, a barrier to communication.

I'm not going to get into your off topic debate here.

Billionaires, even faux billionaires paying no Federal Income Taxes are not paying enough. How much they should be paying is a different conversation and your slogan suggesting I cannot say zero is not enough without saying what is enough is nonsense.

You can't say obscene without defining obscene either.

Fine. Someone can say zero is not enough. But don't expect anyone to agree with your magical unicorn assumptions in your head when you refuse to put them out there for review.
 
There's no whining here, quite the opposite.

Primary sources.

Use them.
Actually he did whine in his twitter feed.

He posted the following:
Nothing on emails. Nothing on the corrupt Clinton Foundation. And nothing on #Benghazi.

Sounds to me like he was whining.

Oh, and Twitter isn't the only place...

From: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-debate-ads_us_57e9e8b1e4b024a52d2a3f3e
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump thinks it’s very unfair that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton airs videos of his words on national television, he said on Monday.Trump complained about her ads both during and after the first presidential debate. He said Clinton “spent hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads on me, many of which are absolutely untrue.”... “And I will tell you this, Lester, it is not nice, and I don’t deserve that, but it’s certainly not a nice thing that she’s done.”

More whining. And I think its amazing that he's complaining because many of the adds are untrue. So how many of the ads ARE true?

And don't forget, as other posters mentioned: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/donald-trump-microphone-debate-228754
Republican nominee Donald J. Trump complained in the spin room that his debate mic wasn't working right
 
You can't say obscene without defining obscene either.

Fine. Someone can say zero is not enough. But don't expect anyone to agree with your magical unicorn assumptions in your head when you refuse to put them out there for review.

"Zero is not enough" to you equates to a "magical unicorn assumption"?

Whatever.
 
I really hope Trump believes the #Trumpwon BS. That way he'll get absolutely destroyed next debate as well.
 
Actually he did whine in his twitter feed.

He posted the following:
Nothing on emails. Nothing on the corrupt Clinton Foundation. And nothing on #Benghazi.

Sounds to me like he was whining.

Huh!? The emails and Libya did come up. He just failed to capitalize on them because he has the attention span of a toddler. How out of it was he last night?
 
The lawyer who wrote the article too, I guess.

:rolleyes:

Actually you and Holt don't understand the difference between stop and frisk being unconstitutional and the NYPD's SELECTIVE PRACTICE of stop and frisk being unconstitutional.

I do, the lawyer writing that article did, and Trump did.

Holt should have kept his big lying yapper shut.
 
Yeah! Donald won self selecting online polls where his fanatical followers can vote as many times as they want. Victory!


LOL

This would explain why Republicans are so very worried about voter fraud: they don't want anyone else getting in on their act.
 

Back
Top Bottom