Researchers found that the people who handled the body weren't as sure as you want it to sound (but they kept it on the down-low).
"Researchers" translates into CTists who wrote a book with cherry-picked, out of context statements to support their bias, and sell books to idiots (like me).
The people who handled the body are more important than panels of shills made to play cleanup.
"Shills" indicates your bias. If you have a medical condition that required emergency surgery do you want a surgeon to do it, or an orderly?
The EOP wound couldn't deflect enough to exit out of the top-right side of the head, and there is no medical evidence connecting the back wound to the throat wound.
Here your ignorance of ballistics kills your argument again. The 6.5 round either cavitated or just blasted straight through. You leave out the fact that JFK's head is at the right angle that is consistent with a through and through.
For a guy who links to the Zapruder film so often I wonder if you've even seen it.
I'd be lying if I said I didn't speculate possible shot sequences in my mind and judge the evidence based on what I know, but the head wound almost certainly had to be caused by at least two bullets if the small wound was all the way down near the EOP as the evidence shows. Even if all of the shots were from behind, a shill may have lit a firecracker on the grassy knoll as a basic distraction technique.
Good lord - no. Just no. Two bullets would have been obvious because they would not have struck at the same time unless they were fired at the exact same time with the shooters standing shoulder to shoulder. Even then, the result would have been partial decapitation of everything above the lower jaw.
Coordinating shots between Oswald and a second shooter in another location so that the rounds impacted at the exact same time would have taken a lot of work, and radio communication, and weeks of DAILY practice to achieve. Without that work, the bullets reach their target at different times.
Which is why nobody would be stupid enough to do it.
We get it, you've never fired a gun, certainly never a rifle, which is why anyone who has finds your theories laughable. Shooting is simple, shooting to kill is simple (toddlers do it all too often). The harder you make it, the harder the shot becomes, the harder the shot becomes the less likely striking the target becomes. Bullets fly in a straight line (mostly. The line working backwards from JFK's body goes right back to the 6th floor window.
Then your next problem with ballistics is the issue of the 6.5×52mm round...It's proprietary to the Carcano, or to use words you can understand, the only rifle 6.5×52mm rounds can be fired from are the Carcano.
For example, today if someone is murdered with 4.6×30mm bullets the police can find the killer by looking for someone with an HK MP-7. Why? Because 4.6×30mm round was designed for the MP-7. No other gun uses it, so you don't waste time looking for other weapon's types.
More importantly is the damage inflicted on JFK and Connally is exclusive to the 6.5×52mm round. In other words, Oswald might as well have autographed his bullets. Again, ballistics is where the JFK CT falls apart. Had they used a generic .762 or 30-06 rifle there would be room to play since there were as many of those in Texas and there were rattlesnakes. Also, the .762 was the prefered caliber of marksmen in 1963, certainly mafia or CIA/Military trained marksmen.
Oswald's Carcano not only killed Kennedy, it continues to kill the second gunman theory. Is impossible to argue against the Carcano since the ballistics evidence excludes all other bullets and leads directly to the 6.5×52mm.
