Why Trump ?

[Fast Eddie B]

I'd still like to see some tea party people who are racist, that of course would brand the whole movement racist?

I remember Chris Mooney being bewildered at how tea party members were advocating for Herman Cain. Seeing as how they're all so racist.

Never seemed to consider the alternative explanation.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

Probably so, problem is it isn't white supremacists doing it, it's other blacks.

you haven't been paying attention to the news this year, have you?

 

[logger]

you haven't been paying attention to the news this year, have you?

Hmm

Are you talking about these racist cops who go through all that training just to get a job where they can kill blacks. Even the black cops no doubt.

 

[acbytesla]

Seems like racism to me to refer to black protesters as excrement.

 

[jimbob]

I'd still like to see some tea party people who are racist, that of course would brand the whole movement racist?

As far as Islamic fundy's I have no idea.

It is the tolerance that is displayed to racists that is more important. The Tea Party is attractive to racists, and that should concern those in the movement who are not racists.

 

[logger]

Seems like racism to me to refer to black protesters as excrement.

Do you not get that that was a question to the other poster?

 

[logger]

It is the tolerance that is displayed to racists that is more important. The Tea Party is attractive to racists, and that should concern those in the movement who are not racists.

Really

And why is that?

 

[jimbob]

Agreed, but all I hear from all too many of those protesters is white People this and white people that. Do you think that is racist on their part?

I was under the impression that a fair number of these posters were white, and the comments are that Clinton is attacking people who *are* (white) racist scum.

The colour is important in context, because I don't think that many black supremacists are supporting Trump. Former(?) KKK members are.

 

[logger]

I was under the impression that a fair number of these posters were white, and the comments are that Clinton is attacking people who *are* (white) racist scum.

Let's be real here, you can count on both hands how many white supremacists support Trump, she brand half the people supporting him. I would argue there are many more Muslims who support sharia that are supporting Hillary. It is certainly my opinion, but white supremacy is dead in this country and that of course is good. The ones that are still around hate everyone, Jews, blacks, Catholics. People on the left are once again using it as a bogeyman.

The colour is important in context, because I don't think that many black supremacists are supporting Trump. Former(?) KKK members are.

That's true, the BLM racists aren't supporting Hillary but the gay, women hating sharia's are.

 

[acbytesla]

Do you not get that that was a question to the other poster?

Do you NOT get that this is a public forum?

 

[eeyore1954]

Seems like racism to me to refer to black protesters as excrement.

Was that done here?

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Let's be real here, you can count on both hands how many white supremacists support Trump, she brand half the people supporting him.

If that's "being real," what is being fictional?

I would argue there are many more Muslims who support sharia that are supporting Hillary.

Spoke too soon.

It is certainly my opinion, but white supremacy is dead in this country and that of course is good.

Spoke way too soon.

 

[acbytesla]

Was that done here?

What do you think?

Originally Posted by logger View Post
Really, I haven't heard anything from white supremacists for years. The only racists who seem to be in the news are the BLM folks. Should we be calling them black pieces of ******

 

[logger]

Do you not get that that was a question to the other poster?

What do you think?

And so I ask again, do you not get that I was asking the good sir a question?

 

[fishbob]

It is racist because there is no need to refer to them as white beyond the descriptor "white supremacist." Gratuitous reference to their skin color conveys a distaste for their whiteness rather than solely focusing on their ideology.

White supremacists are the biggest problem? Hardly. Even among fascist groups, they're like fleas on Muhammad's ass in comparison to Islamic supremacists.

White supremacists advocate supremacy of whites, not necessarily that they are themselves white. The label has nothing to do with their skin color and everything to do with their ideology.

And guess who else was dumber than a box of rocks, sackful of hammers, basket of deplorables?

 

[logger]

What do you think?

It shows your lack of honesty posting here. Clearly it was a question to Babylonian if he thought people should be saying the same things about BLM.

 

[sir drinks-a-lot]

It shows your lack of honesty posting here. Clearly it was a question to Babylonian if he thought people should saying the same things about BLM.

Amazing, huh? They should give a reading comprehension test before allowing people to post on here.

 

[eeyore1954]

What do you think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by logger View Post
Really, I haven't heard anything from white supremacists for years. The only racists who seem to be in the news are the BLM folks. Should we be calling them black pieces of ******

No because that was a rhetorical question. Logger was not calling anyone anything.
Notice the word "should" .

 

[Babbylonian]

Amazing, huh? They should give a reading comprehension test before allowing people to post on here.

Yes, like reading a post for the point of the post rather than letting 4 asterisks send them into a derail spiral.

 

[logger]

Amazing, huh? They should give a reading comprehension test before allowing people to post on here.

Agreed, it's quite offensive, but part of the dem playbook. We can't have serious discussions on this issue because the dems are so dishonest about it.