• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is about a conspiracy theory regarding HC and some russian interests. It devolved into a carnival where crackpots showcase their personal CTs, always without solid evidence.
You dismissed a post because this thread was about HCs health. That is not true. To be an exclusionary topic that woukd be the one of the OP, not a sideshow that appeared in the 3rd iteration of the thread.
So, as I said, you were untruthful.

lol wut.

I think it is pretty clear who is lying here.
 
Isn't the simplest explanation that Clinton picked up a chest infection, hence all the coughing, and because she's been out campaigning instead of resting up to get rid of she's aggravated her condition into full blown pneumonia. Or is that too logical?

Damn it Spock! You and your damn logic. Conspiracy theorists don't use logic when innuendo and wild speculation is available. What do you think know we are, sheeple?
 
Last edited:
Oh, I see, so it would be better if we elected someone else who also took office in 1933? The man with the plan. A final solution kind of fellow?

Gee, I thought putting more sarcasm in my post would make it clearer that I was joking, but I guess for some people it just makes it murkier.

ETA: So let's try MORE sarcasm: absolutely! Anyone who's ever even stubbed a toe should be disqualified. We're talking about the leader of the free world, here. He should be perfect in every way (and therefore not a woman.)
 
Last edited:
Gee, I thought putting more sarcasm in my post would make it clearer that I was joking, but I guess for some people it just makes it murkier.

ETA: So let's try MORE sarcasm: absolutely! Anyone who's ever even stubbed a toe should be disqualified. We're talking about the leader of the free world, here. He should be perfect in every way (and therefore not a woman.)
Are bone spurs in the heels ok?
 
Isn't the simplest explanation that Clinton picked up a chest infection, hence all the coughing, and because she's been out campaigning instead of resting up to get rid of she's aggravated her condition into full blown pneumonia. Or is that too logical?
It's logical, but don't we really want a president that'll only get more hale and hearty in stressful situations like being on the campaign trail?

Clinton's pneumonia for President! Vote with your lungs!
 
Gee, I thought putting more sarcasm in my post would make it clearer that I was joking, but I guess for some people it just makes it murkier.

ETA: So let's try MORE sarcasm: absolutely! Anyone who's ever even stubbed a toe should be disqualified. We're talking about the leader of the free world, here. He should be perfect in every way (and therefore not a woman.)

Oh, I was pretty sure that is what you were doing. I was just playing along. :thumbsup:
 
...
All these questions would be answered if she would submit to an independent medical examination by a neutral panel of doctors. Trump should as well.
For the sake of the voyeurs?

Seriously, the vote is between a wholly unqualified reality TV star and a competent well qualified woman. I wouldn't care if she had terminal cancer, it would not make Trump a viable alternative.

This is all part of Trump's effort to make Clinton look weak, a very sexist tactic.
 
For the sake of the voyeurs?

Seriously, the vote is between a wholly unqualified reality TV star and a competent well qualified woman. I wouldn't care if she had terminal cancer, it would not make Trump a viable alternative.

This is all part of Trump's effort to make Clinton look weak, a very sexist tactic.

It's not that he is a reality TV star, it's not even that he's wholly unqualified (which he is) It's that he's rude, crass, narcissistic, abnoxious, racist, misogynistic, arrogant, reckless and dishonest to the core.

It's not just the qualifications, it's the qualities. It's the type of person he is. I'm the kind of person who looks for the best in people even though I might disagree with them. I disagreed with almost every policy of the 2 Bushs and Reagan, yet I did not dislike any if them

I despise a man who talks about women the way that Trump does. His pathological lying and bragging also does little to impress me. His suggestions that he is smarter than anyone and everyone makes me want to vomit. Trump has all the characteristics of a tyrant. Now, why would we want that type of personality as President?
 
More bad news for Killary: Seems like the "conspiracy theory" about Google using their astonishing manipulation power to help her is based in truth after all. I'm too lazy to search for the thread where I'm sure only idiocy has been added since I last saw it, given the residents in the CT subforum. If someone cares, here's the news you can carry over - pretty profound read: SPUTNIK EXCLUSIVE: Research Proves Google Manipulates Millions to Favor Clinton

Robert Epstein said:
[Postscript: Google declined to comment on the record when queried about some of the concerns I have raised in this article. Instead, on August 17th, a company representative sent me to a blog post released by the company on June 16th; you can read Google's official position on autocomplete there. For the record, I am a moderate politically, and I support Hillary Clinton for president. I do not believe, however, that it would be right for her to win the presidency because of the invisible, large-scale manipulations of a private company. That would make democracy meaningless, and that is why I am trying to keep the public informed about my research findings. Also for the record, I have chosen to publish this article through Sputnik News because Sputnik agreed to publish it in unedited form in order to preserve the article's accuracy. —R.E.]

EPSTEIN (@DrREpstein) is Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology in Vista, California. A PhD of Harvard University, Epstein has published fifteen books on artificial intelligence and other topics. He is also the former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today.
 
Last edited:
More bad news for Killary: Seems like the "conspiracy theory" about Google using their astonishing manipulation power to help her is based in truth after all. I'm too lazy to search for the thread where I'm sure only idiocy has been added since I last saw it, given the residents in the CT subforum. If someone cares, here's the news you can carry over - pretty profound read: SPUTNIK EXCLUSIVE: Research Proves Google Manipulates Millions to Favor Clinton

Yeah. Right:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom