The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

[Reality Check]

Bjarne: A lie about "no gravitational lensing"

...no gravitational lensing,

Usual list of delusions ending with a lie:
5 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie about "no gravitational lensing" when gravitational lensing has been observed exactly as predicted by GR: bending of light by the Sun, Einstein rings, etc.

 

[fuelair]

I think he did a mistake it must be SBD

No, but the first response nailed it.

 

[fuelair]

I think he did a mistake it must be SBD

If you have a mind tending interestingly (mine for example) the first assumption I made re: SBD was referring to osculatory engagement with multiple male form apparatuses (biological) of larger size.

 

[fuelair]

What numbers ? - you have it all

Maths, numbers...We don' need no steenking maths or numbers!!!!!!

 

[fuelair]

Explain the difference as you define it in your model.
Hans

Good luck with that, there!!!

 

[fuelair]

Spam? Again?

How about you answer the question asked instead of spamming your pdf?

You are joking there and you know it. It will never happen because he can't!!!

 

[Bjarne]

No, by your own assertions you are incorrect. Since one would only need to compare "measured data" to "measured data" form other orientations.

However, calculated data is always compared to measured data, that's how you know your set up and/or model ain't screwed up.

Anyway you're not talking about some small fluctuation your talking about a reversal of an evident property (time dilation). Muon detection would drop even below the classical expectation. Every aspect of the set up and the models would be double a triple checked as a such a serious discrepancy would be glaringly obvious. Excuses won't help you either.

time will show tic tac tic tac

 

[Bjarne]

And the evidence for this is?

Are there evidence for the curvature of space ?
Nothing but BS

However, we have solid evidence for black holes.

But not what these really are or the cause of these.

We can observe that gravitational lensing exists. I showed you the evidence, earlier.

Illusion is all you have

Former NASA Physicist Disputes Einstein’s Relativity Theory
http://osnetdaily.com/2016/07/former-nasa-physicist-disputes-einsteins-relativity-theory/

Not only have you no evidence, but the thermodynamics won't work. (Hint, if your thermodynamics don't work, you are in deep trouble.

BS

Speed is not converted to relativistic mass increment. Acceleration is.

BS

Well, we don't have to wait for the ISS. We already know this is not the case

.
You will see

 

[Bjarne]

"Maybe even"? It seems to me that if it was true that there is no curvature of space (it isn't), then there certainly would be no gravitational lensing, no maybe about it.

Stretching space will have a magnifying glass property, but gravity will not in our time be extreme strong, so the ekstreme part of gravitational lensing is really anyway rubbish/

 

[Bjarne]

And why doesn't this happen to GPS satellites?

It does, but not discovered because satellits is set on auto pilot, based on measured orbits, not based on calculated orbits

 

[Bjarne]

What I posted is SR !
5 September 2016 Bjarne: The delusion that a "overall perspective" exists in the real universe!

It is common in SR examples to have 3 observers, e.g. Alice, Bob and Charles.
Alice will measure that her ruler and clock are invariant.
Bob will measure that his ruler and clock are invariant.
Charles measure that his ruler and clock are invariant.
They will measure that each others rulers and clocks are length contracted and time dilated.

BW

 

[Bjarne]

5 September 2016 Bjarne: Two delusional assertions about observer C - infinitely far away = no measurements possible!; "at rest" = no relativistic effects !
The "at rest" is especially delusional since he has already implied that C is moving with respect to A and B.

Lie

 

[Bjarne]

Usual list of delusions ending with a lie:
5 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie about "no gravitational lensing" when gravitational lensing has been observed exactly as predicted by GR: bending of light by the Sun, Einstein rings, etc.

Former NASA Physicist Disputes Einstein’s Relativity Theory
http://osnetdaily.com/2016/07/former-nasa-physicist-disputes-einsteins-relativity-theory/

 

[Bjarne]

Maths, numbers...We don' need no steenking maths or numbers!!!!!!

You have the math to calculate SR time dilation
Now when moving north just replace the -(minus) with the plus (+) - this is a kindergarten lesson

More help here

http://study.com/articles/Kindergarten_Teacher_Requirements_for_Teaching_Kindergarten.html

 

[dasmiller]

It does, but not discovered because satellits is set on auto pilot, based on measured orbits, not based on calculated orbits

As I and others have tried to explain, you are completely wrong about this. Every GPS spacecraft is continuously broadcasting an orbit that was previously calculated. It's ALWAYS calculated orbits.

 

[dasmiller]

You have the math to calculate SR time dilation
Now when moving north just replace the -(minus) with the plus (+) - this is a kindergarten lesson

More help here

http://study.com/articles/Kindergarten_Teacher_Requirements_for_Teaching_Kindergarten.html

This +/- adjustment is not observed on GPS spacecraft even when they're traveling more north/south than ISS.

 

[Daylightstar]

Ehm, Bjarne,

...

What causes your 'ruler object' to be able to measure distance?​

^{Added embedded link.}

 

[Daylightstar]

Well, we don't have to wait for the ISS. We already know this is not the case

.
You will see

What exactly will we see?

what will the data for 'the experiment' on the ISS, which you believe will support your notions, look like?​

 

[MRC_Hans]

Are there evidence for the curvature of space ?
Nothing but BS

Tons of evidence. It's in those books you neglected to read.

But not what these really are or the cause of these.

(Black holes.) Observations fit the theory.

Illusion is all you have

( Gravitational lensing.) And a lot of observations. Photos, too.

Former NASA Physicist Disputes Einstein’s Relativity Theory
http://osnetdaily.com/2016/07/former-nasa-physicist-disputes-einsteins-relativity-theory/

AH, the electric universe guy. I'd like to see him explain those photos.

You will see

I will, just like all your other predictions, for the last nine years.

Hans

 

[The Man]

time will show tic tac tic tac

No, unfortunately it won't, as we would have already noted the effect you assert and it is unlikely that you will ever abandon your baseless and often self-contradictory assertions. Equally unlikely is some time where you actually put in a sincere effort to quantify your notions as that might actually tell you something.