• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bjarne, what will the data from an 'experiment' on the ISS which you believe will support your notions, look like?
Don't forget about the ruler question(s) above.

Please answer like an adult.
 
Bjarne, what will the data from an 'experiment' on the ISS which you believe will support your notions, look like?
Don't forget about the ruler question(s) above.

Please answer like an adult.

Relativity is much simpler and down to earth than you ever imagine.
The theory should from the beginning only have been about proportional reality transformation.
This mean EVERTHING is elastic proportional with time dilation.
Nothing more than this.

  • No black hole,
  • no worm holes,
  • no curvature of space, and maybe even
  • no gravitational lensing,

but as I wrote, - it is all only due to an elastic property of EVERYTHING, where space is the common elastic determination.

Now why is space (and everything) stretching?
Answer: because matter absorbs elastic space.

The same happens in a process where speed is converted and conserved as relativistic mass increment, - that phenomena too is addition local absorption of space.

Einstein tried to get some sense out of the time dilation and length contraction, that was already known before his theories, - and thought it was all due to relative motion etc... He became blinded of these ideas, and so did the rest of the world

Deformation of reality is due to a simple elastic property of space.

Relativistic mass can only increase due to true motion.
When moving opposite the true motion direction (dark flow), the relativistic transformation effects will also be opposite, - and this is what the ISS measurement will reveal when moving north relative to ecliptica.

In the end of the day you have to consider the process whereby true speed/motion is converted to relativistic effects, at least theoretical.
 
Last edited:
Only if calculated data always was compared to measured data



No, by your own assertions you are incorrect. Since one would only need to compare "measured data" to "measured data" form other orientations.

However, calculated data is always compared to measured data, that's how you know your set up and/or model ain't screwed up.

Anyway you're not talking about some small fluctuation your talking about a reversal of an evident property (time dilation). Muon detection would drop even below the classical expectation. Every aspect of the set up and the models would be double a triple checked as a such a serious discrepancy would be glaringly obvious. Excuses won't help you either.
 
Bjarne, what will the data from an 'experiment' on the ISS which you believe will support your notions, look like?
Don't forget about the ruler question(s) above.

Please answer like an adult.
Relativity is much simpler and down to earth than you ever imagine.
The theory should from the beginning only have been about proportional reality transformation.
This mean EVERTHING is elastic proportional with time dilation.
Nothing more than this.

  • No black hole,
  • no worm holes,
  • no curvature of space, and maybe even
  • no gravitational lensing,

but as I wrote, - it is all only due to an elastic property of EVERYTHING, where space is the common elastic determination.

Now why is space (and everything) stretching?
Answer: because matter absorbs elastic space.

The same happens in a process where speed is converted and conserved as relativistic mass increment, - that phenomena too is addition local absorption of space.

Einstein tried to get some sense out of the time dilation and length contraction, that was already known before his theories, - and thought it was all due to relative motion etc... He became blinded of these ideas, and so did the rest of the world

Deformation of reality is due to a simple elastic property of space.

Relativistic mass can only increase due to true motion.
When moving opposite the true motion direction (dark flow), the relativistic transformation effects will also be opposite, - and this is what the ISS measurement will reveal when moving north relative to ecliptica.

In the end of the day you have to consider the process whereby true speed/motion is converted to relativistic effects, at least theoretical.

This does not answer the question nor does it look impressive. Following is a repeat of the question and this time, be an adult about it:

What will the data from an 'experiment' on the ISS which you believe will support your notions, look like?​
 
Spam? Again?

How about you answer the question asked instead of spamming your pdf?

Or as that PDF was purportedly modified. Identify exactly which aspects brought up by other posters about your previous PDF you have addressed. Where you have addressed them and exactly how you have addressed them. Hide and seek games won't help you either.
 
Relativity is much simpler and down to earth than you ever imagine.
The theory should from the beginning only have been about proportional reality transformation.
This mean EVERTHING is elastic proportional with time dilation.
Nothing more than this.

And the evidence for this is?

No black hole,

However, we have solid evidence for black holes.

no worm holes,

Well, those are hypothetical.

no curvature of space, and maybe even
no gravitational lensing,

We can observe that gravitational lensing exists. I showed you the evidence, earlier.

but as I wrote, - it is all only due to an elastic property of EVERYTHING, where space is the common elastic determination.

But you have no evidence.

Now why is space (and everything) stretching?
Answer: because matter absorbs elastic space.

Not only have you no evidence, but the thermodynamics won't work. (Hint, if your thermodynamics don't work, you are in deep trouble.

The same happens in a process where speed is converted and conserved as relativistic mass increment, - that phenomena too is addition local absorption of space.

Speed is not converted to relativistic mass increment. Acceleration is.

Einstein tried to get some sense out of the time dilation and length contraction, that was already known before his theories, - and thought it was all due to relative motion etc... He became blinded of these ideas, and so did the rest of the world

And we should believe this because YOU say so? :rolleyes:


Relativistic mass can only increase due to true motion.

True motion. OK, so you subscribe to a fixed motion frame. OK; you are in deep trouble, then.

When moving opposite the true motion direction (dark flow), the relativistic transformation effects will also be opposite, - and this is what the ISS measurement will reveal when moving north relative to ecliptica.

Well, we don't have to wait for the ISS. We already know this is not the case.

In the end of the day you have to consider the process whereby true speed/motion is converted to relativistic effects, at least theoretical.[/QUOTE]

Hans
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that was the piece of garbage I was talking about.

We've already ripped that particular piece of refuse to shreds. I don't know why you're responding with it as if we're all going to suddenly forget how thoroughly we dismantled it. You don't even have anything that even remotely resembles a mathematical support for your theory. Frankly, you should be embarrassed to be continually reposting that thing especially in response to criticisms about the lack of a mathematical basis for your theories.

You posting that PDF in response to criticism of your theory is roughly comparable to Tom Thumb submitting a picture of his hand when applying for a job as an actor in a porn film. You're not defending yourself with that PDF. You are highlighting your theories shortcomings.
 
Last edited:
  • No black hole,
  • no worm holes,
    [*]no curvature of space, and maybe even [*]no gravitational lensing,
"Maybe even"? It seems to me that if it was true that there is no curvature of space (it isn't), then there certainly would be no gravitational lensing, no maybe about it.
 
Bjarne: The delusion that a "overall perspective" exists in the real universe

Exactly what you just wrote is the problem with relativity.
What I posted is SR :jaw-dropp!
5 September 2016 Bjarne: The delusion that a "overall perspective" exists in the real universe!

It is common in SR examples to have 3 observers, e.g. Alice, Bob and Charles.
Alice will measure that her ruler and clock are invariant.
Bob will measure that his ruler and clock are invariant.
Charles measure that his ruler and clock are invariant.
They will measure that each others rulers and clocks are length contracted and time dilated.

Retaining total ignorance of SR is your Achilles tendon cut 7 years ago, Bjarne.
The RR fantasy appearing on 15 October 2009 here, continued ignorance of high school level science and digging a pit of fantasies from Bjarne (134 items of ignorance, fantasy, delusion and lies in this thread alone!).
  1. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie about SR being based on the Lorentz equation. Anyone can read the fact that SR is based on its 2 postulates from which it derives the Lorentz equation.
  2. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: The repeated lie about curvature of spacetime never being proven correct - experimental tests of GR only works with curvature of spacetime !
  3. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: The ignorant assertion that curvature of spacetime is related to the Lorentz equation. The curvature of spacetime is derived from the equivalence principle.
  4. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: It was Minkowski who invented "space-time"!
  5. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: Lots of lies and delusions about "MTR" starting with the lie that it is a modified theory of relativity. The RR delusion has nothing do with an ignorant picture of SR.
  6. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie about an image having calculations of the perihelion precession of Mercury.
  7. 30 August 2016 Bjarne: A "100% perfect prediction" delusion since your predictions do not match observations.
  8. 31 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie about "80% GR math = done" when no GR is involved in your ignorant math not about the perihelion precession of Mercury!
  9. 31 August 2016 Bjarne: GR is a lot more than the Lorentz transformation.
  10. 31 August 2016 Bjarne: The delusion that "redshift will be blueshift".
  11. 31 August 2016 Bjarne: The delusion that "gravity will be dark energy".
  12. 2 September 2016 Bjarne: The abysmal ignorance of Euclidean geometry being relativistic.
  13. 2 September 2016 Bjarne: Delusions about "true speed" and speed being converted to mass
  14. 2 September 2016 Bjarne: Lies about SR or GR being a dying theory and a "problem" - your ignorance and delusions about SR and GR do not have any effect on science.
 
Bjarne[: Two delusional assertions about observer C

C could be infinitely far away and at rest. Such a concept is already used in theoretical science.
5 September 2016 Bjarne: Two delusional assertions about observer C - infinitely far away = no measurements possible!; "at rest" = no relativistic effects :jaw-dropp!
The "at rest" is especially delusional since he has already implied that C is moving with respect to A and B.
 
Bjarne: Delusions of "absolute motion reference frame" and "absolute speed reference"

You must distinguish between...
5 September 2016 Bjarne: Delusions of an "absolute motion reference frame" and "absolute speed reference".
The experimental basis of SR and GR shows there are no "absolute" frames of reference. All speeds are relative even in classical physics :jaw-dropp!
 
Bjarne: Delusion that an experiment he has no knowledge of will disprove SR

Predicted SR-time dilation will be turned upside down a certain part of the ISS path
5 September 2016 Bjarne: Delusion that an experiment he has no knowledge of will disprove SR which he is also ignorant about :jaw-dropp!

5 September 2016 Bjarne: Repeated ignorance of basic science - a theory which has been shown to work by many experiments will not be disproved by more accurate versions of those experiments!

5 September 2016 Bjarne: Repeated ignorance of the real world where GPS satellites also have that "certain part" of their orbit and work :eye-poppi!
The mere existence of working GPS satellites in valorous orbits shows that his RR/dark flow delusion has no measurable effects.
 
Bjarne: An implied lie about having numeric predictions for the ISS experiment

What numbers ? - you have it all
5 September 2016 Bjarne: An implied lie about having numeric predictions for the ISS experiment when he has no idea what it is :jaw-dropp!
For that matter he has no idea what the orbit of the ISS is or how it is related to his RR/dark flow delusion. The numeric "predictions" we have from him are random math with no valid physics which do not include anything about the ISS.
 
Bjarne: A lie that his PDF contains numeric predictions for the ISS

5 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie that his PDF contains numeric predictions for the ISS when the actual orbit of the ISS is not included.
There is a delusional assumption about "an orbit aligned to the ecliptic south / north (dark flow) axis". Dark flow is not known to exist. If it exists then it is not a flow north or south of the ecliptic .

5 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie that dark flow is north to south as in his Fig. 11.

5 September 2016 Bjarne: The delusion that a possible dark flow at least billions of light years away from us can have effects here that be detected.
The probable explanation for any dark flow is a concentration of galaxies outside of the visible universe, i.e. a distance of about 46 billion light years :eek:!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom