The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

[The Man]

Yes you are right, Einstein should know he also could ignore the SR effect, regarding the perihelion aspect. Strange he took a such idiotic decision then.

He didn't, again if I recall correctly the GR contribution to the perihelion sift is the result of a parallel transport of a vector around a closed loop in a curved space not pointing in the same direction on the completion of that loop. So it is GR and you remain the only one being "idiotic".


ETA: Perhaps this is Bjarne confusion (or part of it) by "space" above I'm referring to a general mathematical space which in the case of GR is where the space-time manifold is mapped. So the general mathematical reference to "a space" and even "a curved space" may be confusing him to think that it isn't space-time to which the curvature refers to in GR.

Bjarne you should understand that given the consistency of the speed of light (which you seem to agree with) then units of time can be converted to units of space. While the three spatial dimensions sum trigonometrically. The spatial and temporal dimensions sum hyperbolically (becouse of that speed limit of c). As a result we get, in units of distance, a space-time separation (or interval). Of particular importance for SR as that separation is the same for all inertial reference frames.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

See also Minkowski space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space

/ETA

Let me see if I get a little time the next few weeks, I can approve the GR math aspect a little, maybe enough to that you will understand that there is one more, much more serious option..

Take as much time as you need to actually get serious about the math.

 

[The Man]

Me ?
Do you really mean me ?

Absolutely. By all means please show us mathematically that you do understand the difference between different distances and just different units of measure for distance.

 

[The Man]

From the kindergarten and
One day you will see it can beat Harward.
You know one day this will be a bigger shame to the rest of the world as it is to me.

Got that ?

Could it possibly be a bigger shame than claiming to beat Harvard by misspelling Harvard?

 

[Daylightstar]

Could it possibly be a bigger shame than claiming to beat Harvard by misspelling Harvard?

Well, calling a flyby maneuver a flyby manure doesn't exactly earn a Great Distinction.

Even though the spelling errors are ehm, let's say, somewhat 'distinct'

 

[Bjarne]

The Teletubbies Science Institute of Technology School

No, - the right brain institute of imagination development

 

[halleyscomet]

From the kindergarten and
One day you will see it can beat Harward.
You know one day this will be a bigger shame to the rest of the world as it is to me.

Got that ?

No, not really. That made no sense at all. You seem to be trying to claim a science education from Harvard University is inferior to the one you got in kindergarten. I'd like to blame the language barrier on your incomprehensible response, but I've read your posts about physics, so I know thinking this disordered is not limited to your grasp of English.

Let's try this again:

Where did you get your science education?

No, - the right brain institute of imagination development

Are you seriously saying you have no science education beyond what was provided in kindergarten?

Does your homeland not have remedial science classes after the age of 5?

 

[Bjarne]

Could it possibly be a bigger shame than claiming to beat Harvard by misspelling Harvard?

It's a necessary implement to make the pain bigger, - not for me off course

 

[Daylightstar]

No, - the right brain institute of imagination development

The right brain is only half a brain, so .... half witted imagination is what you do?

 

[halleyscomet]

It's a necessary implement to make the pain bigger, - not for me off course

(Sarcasm)

I'm sure anyone with a science degree from Harvard university has been cut to the quick by your failure to spell the name of their school.

(/Sarcasm)

 

[halleyscomet]

The right brain is only half a brain, so .... half witted imagination is what you do?

I think calling his science denial half-witted is giving it too much credit. Maybe a quarter wit, but only if the wits were donated by guinea pigs.

 

[Daylightstar]

..., - not for me off course

No, clearly not. Your crutch is your crutch.

 

[halleyscomet]

Let's summarize the thread thus far:

Bjarne claims to have a theory that will overthrow relativity.

The math is very complicated, and will need "sophisticated software" that does not yet exist.

The math is easy and can be done by a kindergartner.

He hasn't done the math to support his theory and admits he's too lazy to do it.

The math is done, complete and perfect, beyond reproach.

The math is mostly done but he needs to spend some time working on it.

Black holes are ca-ca.

The discarding of the Ether theory was the result of one flawed experiment, and the last 100 years of research and technology around light do NOT, according to Bjarne, in any way, prove otherwise.

We're all ca-ca heads for not believing his rambling, frequently contradictory claims.

The theory of relativity is a religion. And a lie.

Bjarne has yet to convince a single human being to believe his ideas over Einstein's.

Did I miss anything Bjarne?

 

[Bjarne]

Are you seriously saying you have no science education beyond what was provided in kindergarten?

Does your homeland not have remedial science classes after the age of 5?

Even if you would spend 75 at Harvards, (spelled wrong intentionally) you still would not be able to solve what is dark matter, dark energy, the cause of flyby and 100 other huge mysteries. But most likely only waste you life..

But if you would spend a Little more time with children maybe you right brain half would maybe work a little better, and you would be able really to understand that imagination is more important than knowledge, that would be a important step.

 

[Daylightstar]

I think calling his science denial half-witted is giving it too much credit. Maybe a quarter wit, but only if the wits were donated by guinea pigs.

Hmm you have a point, certainly since the currently relevant half part appears in itself half witted, a quarter sounds about right.

 

[halleyscomet]

Even if you would spend 75 at Harvards, (spelled wrong intentionally) you still would not be able to solve what is dark matter, dark energy, the cause of flyby and 100 other huge mysteries. But most likely only waste you life..

But if you would spend a Little more time with children maybe you right brain half would maybe work a little better, and you would be able really to understand that imagination is more important than knowledge, that would be a important step.

So you're a preschool teacher who considers higher education something that truncates complex thought?

If the misspelling is intentional, what are you trying to achieve by it?

I've been going over your web site, http://science27.com, and I'm wondering what the point of the site is. You make a lot of bald assertions, but don't seem to provide any evidence or math to back them up. Why bother? What's the point of a random scientifically illiterate individual who admits they're too lazy to do the math spouting off ideas they cooked up while talking to children, presumably about relativity?

 

[Bjarne]

Let's summarize the thread thus far:

Bjarne claims to have a theory that will overthrow relativity.

True

The math is very complicated, and will need "sophisticated software" that does not yet exist.

To really solve the perihelion anomaly perfect yes, it can be done roughly without..

The math is easy and can be done by a kindergartner.

True, shooting down SR is that easy

He hasn't done the math to support his theory and admits he's too lazy to do it

.
Both lazy and busy

The math is done, complete and perfect, beyond reproach.

True, shooting down SR is that easy

The math is mostly done but he needs to spend some time working on it.

Taking down the superstitious parts of GR is a little m ore complicated as I thought

Black holes are ca-ca.

Conflicting with science it self yes, thats true

The discarding of the Ether theory was the result of one flawed experiment, and the last 100 years of research and technology around light do NOT, according to Bjarne, in any way, prove otherwise.

True, and the prove will be here very very soon. - It's a consequence of SR falling apart

We're all ca-ca heads for not believing his rambling, frequently contradictory claims.

Let's time judge that question

The theory of relativity is a religion. And a lie.

Maybe even more fanatic like the worse fanatic religions, yes

Did I miss anything Bjarne?

Yes what will you say if ISS test of GR/SR shows I am correct?

Well I know it already, you will say it was a coincidence, or that I have stolen the theory etc...

 

[The Man]

So you're a preschool teacher who considers higher education something that truncates complex thought?

If the misspelling is intentional, what are you trying to achieve by it?

I expect it is a kindergarten taunt, like calling someone named Lewis Stern sewers turn. Though obviously not as creative.

 

[halleyscomet]

Yes what will you say if ISS test of GR/SR shows I am correct?

Well I know it already, you will say it was a coincidence, or that I have stolen the theory etc...

Nope. I'd say it's not possible for the ISS to confirm or deny your science denial because you haven't bothered providing the information needed to evaluate the ISS results in light of your theory.

You know that pesky math you keep avoiding? Without it, your theory can't be tested. You're too lazy to be vindicated.

Perhaps if you spent less time spouting egotistical nonsense here and more time working on your ideas you might find time to do the math.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
Yes what will you say if ISS test of GR/SR shows I am correct?

Well I know it already, you will say it was a coincidence, or that I have stolen the theory etc...

You'd first have to be able to show exactly what you'd be correct about, but, you're not able to do that.

 

[halleyscomet]

You'd first have to be able to show exactly what you'd be correct about, but, you're not able to do that.

Perhaps the kindergartners can help him with his maths!



I'm still wondering where he gets his hubris from. He's claiming Relativity can be easily toppled by kindergarten math, yet he can't produce the equations and he's apparently the first person in 100 years to figure it out. While geniuses who rewrite science do come along now and then, a guy who can't produce the preschool math he says proves his ideas isn't one of them.