Trump could win presidency: Yes or No?

[PartSkeptic]

There's a yuger difference.... you cannot diagnose the disorders being credited to Hillary by looking at video of her behavior. You can actually diagnose a personality disorder by viewing the subject's behavior. It's defined by behavior, essentially.

Do you think that the average person is unable to say that they have just witnessed what was a seizure of some sort? That was no joking around by Hillary. One reporter pulled back in shock.

To insist on a unanimous verdict from a panel of the top 10 neurosurgeons is over the top, and plain denial.

Hillary has a problem. The question is exactly what it is, how bad it is, how it could affect her judgment, and what the side effects of any medication are?

What are the reasons for non-disclosure? And why are the mainstream media avoiding the issue?

 

[Foolmewunz]

Do you think that the average person is unable to say that they have just witnessed what was a seizure of some sort? That was no joking around by Hillary. One reporter pulled back in shock.

To insist on a unanimous verdict from a panel of the top 10 neurosurgeons is over the top, and plain denial.

Hillary has a problem. The question is exactly what it is, how bad it is, how it could affect her judgment, and what the side effects of any medication are?

What are the reasons for non-disclosure? And why are the mainstream media avoiding the issue?

Please link to the footage you're analyzing. I believe we've all established that it's a "loop", but would be curious to see if we're talking about the same thing. The famous Starbucks shot? There's nothing to it except her goofing around with a coterie of reporters shoving recording devices in her face.

And, the reason for the non-disclosure is that there's nothing to disclose. She's released her medical reports and unlike Agent Orange, she doesn't appear to have ghost-written them. Drudge and Alex Jones and Bannon would love that the campaign or the candidate responds to every ludicrous Youtube by Paul Joseph Watson or propagandists of a similar ilk.

I think the non-disclosure is directly related to Trump/NAMBLA. How about the charges against Glenn Beck that he refused to address. Must be true, huh, huh? Why won't they address them? Huh? Huh?

 

[Noztradamus]

It is very obvious to me that Trump is a very confident business person who has leadership qualities.
That scares the elite because he is unlikely to be "controllable" or "bought".
Hillary is ideally suited in those two regards.

Here is a test of bias (inspired by a comments section on some site or other).
A. You are in an elevator with Trump, Hitler and Stalin. You have a gun with two bullets. What would you do?
B. You are in an elevator with Hillary, Hitler and Stalin. You have a gun with two bullets. What would you do?

There is a further upcoming test on which of the answers you find humorous.

Note: I am not advocating violence. This is humor.
There are plenty of "triggers" for nuts out there. Or are there nuts in this forum?

As Hitler and Stalin are already dead, I'd go for the double tap

 

[TubbaBlubba]

As Hitler and Stalin are already dead, I'd go for the double tap

Or shoot Hitler and Trump. Pretty sure I could take the 5' cripple-arm Stalin in a fight.

 

[The Don]

Absolutely agree that the diagnosis is "shaky at best".

I imagine that you would say the same regarding Trump's alleged personality disorder.

Yes, especially if they were claiming it was an actual medical diagnosis instead of "just" political name-calling.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

It is very obvious to me that Trump is a very confident business person who has leadership qualities.

Such as?

 

[Fitter]

Two rounds into the Muzak speaker.

 

[Ladewig]

It is very obvious to me that Trump is a very confident business person who has leadership qualities.
That scares the elite because he is unlikely to be "controllable" or "bought".
Hillary is ideally suited in those two regards.

Here is a test of bias (inspired by a comments section on some site or other).
A. You are in an elevator with Trump, Hitler and Stalin. You have a gun with two bullets. What would you do?
B. You are in an elevator with Hillary, Hitler and Stalin. You have a gun with two bullets. What would you do?

There is a further upcoming test on which of the answers you find humorous.

Note: I am not advocating violence. This is humor.
There are plenty of "triggers" for nuts out there. Or are there nuts in this forum?

If I am facing H&S after they have killed some people and before they have a chance to kill others, then I would unhesitatingly kill them.

Bottom line for me, Trump has done nothing to deserve being killed so I would not kill him.

.........
The hypothetical does not say the bullets must be used to create a homocide. So, shooting Trump in the foot is still on the table. (I couldn't do it because I loathe using violence to change the direction of a free and functioning democracy).

I am curious as to how many board members are confident that Trump would recognize both men.

 

[TubbaBlubba]

I am curious as to how many board members are confident that Trump would recognize both men.

I suspect a lot of people would struggle to recognize Stalin unless he is in his postwar era uniform due to the exposure to enhanced propaganda pictures. Even in the USSR it was not uncommon for people faced with Stalin to struggle to recognize him until they got a portrait to compare him to.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

It is very obvious to me that Trump is a very confident business person who has leadership qualities.
That scares the elite because he is unlikely to be "controllable" or "bought".

Subjective opinion analysis has poor replicability of results, as evidenced by the fact that mine are exactly opposite yours.

Trump is in a constant cycle of debt and failure such that numerous banks refuse to do business with him and the IRS has him on a routine audit. That doesn't mean his audit is just routine, an ordinary thing; no, that means the IRS decided they need to double and triple check every single line of every single form every single quarter and trust not a single thing he tells them, ever. That's why he won't release his taxes - it's a passive aggressive bull crap move that also hides his true income claim after all the Lines are added and subtracted, which is probably near zero.

His debt load and financial structures alone make him succeptible to manipulation and leverage. The KGB loves people who are in desperate debt.

Moral allegations against him differ from those he has flung at others (Cruz/JFK, etc) in that they are consistent with known facts about all players, and suggest there is likely blackmail dirt against Trump somewhere. The KGB loves people with secrets in their closets.

Trump relies in poor quality, short attention span information sources like tabloids, Twitter, a bubble of sycophants and RT, and has already demonstrated a tendency to believe in dumb conspiracy theories. The KGB loves people with poor or very narrowly focussed critical thinking skills.

Hillary is ideally suited in those two regards.

Hillary wanted to be president at the age of 16 and knows her way around the machinery of politics. There's not a single point of leverage against her. The KGB hates poeple they can't manipulate with fear, shame, greed or prejudice.

Here is a test of bias (inspired by a comments section on some site or other).
A. You are in an elevator with Trump, Hitler and Stalin. You have a gun with two bullets. What would you do?
B. You are in an elevator with Hillary, Hitler and Stalin. You have a gun with two bullets. What would you do?

There is a further upcoming test on which of the answers you find humorous.

Note: I am not advocating violence. This is humor.
There are plenty of "triggers" for nuts out there. Or are there nuts in this forum?

This is stupid. Are we in the elevator with these three at the same point in their careers, or in some imaginary retrospect/imagine the worst future after Clinton is done with her two terms?

If at the same point in their careers, just before taking power, knowing what I know today, I'd shoot Stalin in the heart twice, kick hitler's testicle and send him back to prison and look sternly at Hillary in warning to behave.

 

[PartSkeptic]

Please link to the footage (snip) There's nothing to it except her goofing around with a coterie of reporters shoving recording devices in her face.

(snip)

June 10 - Washington DC muffin shop.

If you think that she is "goofing around", then I am at a loss for words.

So shocked that if you could see my head shaking from side to side after reading your post, you would think I was having some kind of spasm. And I nearly fell on the floor with a fit of hysterical laughing. (Just joking, in case someone takes me seriously.)

 

[PartSkeptic]

Two rounds into the Muzak speaker.

In my book you get the prize for humor. An unexpected answer but one most of us could concur with.

 

[PartSkeptic]

As Hitler and Stalin are already dead, I'd go for the double tap

Close. Presumably for either candidate!

The comment was that "I would use both bullets on Hillary" since only option B was given on the website (a conservative one).

A follow-up comment was "that action would save future catastrophe since Hitler and Stalin have already done their evil".

It got me thinking. Would a Hillary supporter find that funny? What if the joke was about Trump only?

The problem is that the joke only works once, with whomever it is about, and it is hard to see check if one would laugh more at one rather than the other.

 

[Foolmewunz]

June 10 - Washington DC muffin shop.

If you think that she is "goofing around", then I am at a loss for words.

So shocked that if you could see my head shaking from side to side after reading your post, you would think I was having some kind of spasm. And I nearly fell on the floor with a fit of hysterical laughing. (Just joking, in case someone takes me seriously.)

Yep. As I thought. Your bias is shining through. Neither of us are holders of advanced degrees in mental health or neurology, but I did graduate from Whatsamatta U. with an advanced placement certification in Goofing Around. If you see the un-looped version and see it from the other angle available, it's pretty apparent she's riffing on having all the questions thrown at her and recording devices shoved in her face.

 

[Stacko]

Yep. As I thought. Your bias is shining through. Neither of us are holders of advanced degrees in mental health or neurology, but I did graduate from Whatsamatta U. with an advanced placement certification in Goofing Around. If you see the un-looped version and see it from the other angle available, it's pretty apparent she's riffing on having all the questions thrown at her and recording devices shoved in her face.

The fact that she didn't enter any form of postictal state and continued on like a normal person that just shook their head after the "seizure" an excellent sign she was jut shaking her head. This line of conspiratorial attack is insulting to people that have seizure disorders and demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge about seizures and their effects.

 

[RecoveringYuppy]

June 10 - Washington DC muffin shop.

Perhaps you should actually link to the footage that convinced you. Because all the footage I can find for myself would only be cited by liars or imbeciles.

 

[ddt]

Do you think that the average person is unable to say that they have just witnessed what was a seizure of some sort? That was no joking around by Hillary. One reporter pulled back in shock.

To insist on a unanimous verdict from a panel of the top 10 neurosurgeons is over the top, and plain denial.

Hillary has a problem. The question is exactly what it is, how bad it is, how it could affect her judgment, and what the side effects of any medication are?

What are the reasons for non-disclosure? And why are the mainstream media avoiding the issue?

Even IF Hillary had a seizure and suffers from epilepsy - which I doubt based on the responses from other posters whom I trust more, and I'm not going to hunt for and watch the footage - I think that's highly offensive to all those who suffer from epilepsy. And I did so myself from the age of 6 to the age of 11. Epilepsy does not interfere with someone's ability to function and make sound judgment calls. Unlike a narcissistic personality disorder, from which Trump is obviously suffering considering what experts say.

 

[aleCcowaN]

The Presidential Debates people ... The Presidential Debates

En la cancha se ven los pingos (you'll know a horse in the track --> "when the rubber meets the road")

 

[Ladewig]

Close. Presumably for either candidate!

The comment was that "I would use both bullets on Hillary" since only option B was given on the website (a conservative one).

A follow-up comment was "that action would save future catastrophe since Hitler and Stalin have already done their evil".

It got me thinking. Would a Hillary supporter find that funny? What if the joke was about Trump only?

I, personally didn't find it all that funny, but I will confess to having an eccentric sense of humor. If I look at the joke objectively, it is a pretty good joke. The joke works on more than one level because after the conservatives are finished laughing, someone on the left will say, "Jokes about killing Clinton are dangerous because someone might actually kill her." At that point the conservatives would laugh even more.

 

[PartSkeptic]

Yep. As I thought. Your bias is shining through. Neither of us are holders of advanced degrees in mental health or neurology, but I did graduate from Whatsamatta U. with an advanced placement certification in Goofing Around. If you see the un-looped version and see it from the other angle available, it's pretty apparent she's riffing on having all the questions thrown at her and recording devices shoved in her face.

I looked at various versions from various angles. She bobs and blinks, recovers slightly and then bobs and blinks a second time and then comments about the drink. What "looping" are you referring to?

Many sites play it multiple times, but it is clear where the start and finish is.

Hillary is a tightly controlled person who wants to look presidential at all times. I do not see this as voluntary. There are times she bobs and nods excessively but it is part of her stage presence. Perhaps she has not stopped it so as to have an excuse if it happens involuntarily.

The lack of (mass, liberal) media coverage is a give-away that they think it may be a problem.

Time will tell.