It's getting pretty infantile to constantly being attacked as an antisemite whenever I post. it really is. I could say a lot against you people but I really hold back... Really is this a discussion or a constant personal attack?
I merely stated that comment like the one quoted below were the Jews are responsible of everything which turns wrong are typical from anti-Semitic mind and behavior and I am apparently not alone to share this view:
Trafficant basically destroyed his political career because the Jews, as always, came after him viciously....They like to do that. The Jews have no conscience towards being reputable and honorable sometimes. They'll defend murderers like Leo Frank, Jew, or spy's like Jonathan Pollard, scumbags to say the least. The Jews defended these people big time, even making Jonathan Pollard a hero in Israel. Of course he was responsible for probably hundreds of American agents deaths...Thank you Jews...
Now you might also try to serioulsy consider other reasons that the Jews to explain the disorders which affect our world.
Anyway the Malmedy incident seems to be very confusing. It seems to me that the Americans killed some Germans in a massacre and now the Americans got it back. Who knows.
Well, I was expecting this kind of answer, I am therefore not surprised to read this.
Do you have any reference to a prior massacre of Germans by Americans soldiers during the Battle of the Bulge?
Could it have been set up? Could the Americans have made a typical battle seem like a massacre? Why were their dog tags missing? Yet they were identified?
This is bad luck for you. My birthplace is two miles away from the spot of the massacre.
This fact is well known in the area. None of the people living around the spot has never seen Something like "the Americans make a typical battle seem like a massacre". And they could not have done it without nobody noticing.
Furthermore there was no snow on the ground when the massacre occurred. It snowed only the day after. If the Americans would have made a battle look like a massacre there would have been footprints all over the place. And the corpses gathered on the site were frozen as show the picture:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Massacre_de_Malmedy_43-0085a-1-.gif I have never read a serious source mentionning that their dog tags were missing. Where did you get this information from?
As you seem to ignore it there were also 50 men who escaped the massacre and testified of what they had seen, sometime in the very few hours following the massacre. They all told basically the same story: they were made prisoners by a German unit (it would appear later it was the 1st SS-Panzer Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler (LSSAH)) and were assembled in a field close to Baugnez crossroads. After a few minutes the Germans opened fire on them with machine guns and moved them down. Some of the Americans tried to flee and a fee managed to do so. Other fell to ground and pretended to be dead. After the machines guns stopped their fire, Germans walked trough the men and fired to all those who were moving or moaning.
This has been confirmed by the
forensic examination made after the bodies had be recoverd. At least 20 of the victims had "potentially fatal gunshot wounds to the head inflicted at very close range in addition to wounds from automatic weapons", something that is unlikely to happen in the course of a battle.
There is is fact no doubt anymore that more than 70 US POWs were killed in cold blood by German Waffen SS.
I also add that the following days the same Waffen-SS unit would kill with no reason some 160 Belgian civilians in
Stavelot and
Trois-Ponts. This is also well documented and not only by pictures as this one:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stavelot_massacre_maison_Legaye.jpg
Men belonging to the LSSAH is also responsible for having killed 11 US prisoners at the Hamlet of
Wereth on 17 December 1944. Apparently the only reason of the massacre was that they were Africans Americans. These murders were most probably racially motivated.
The incident is still a bit confusing.
Not at all. Facts are clear and very well established.
BUT the issue was these Germans were tortured to exact confessions which if you saw the Goya's Ghost happens. Rudolph Hoess also was subject to heinous torture and came under the same thing saying things that were not true. Who knows what happened but I am swinging to that the incident was a set up to blame the Germans for a battle Americas lost and now are embarrassed they lost, I could be wrong.
To the best of my knowledge the German lost the Battle of Bulge, not the Americans. Germans could never fulfill their objective which was to take Antwerp port and cut the Allied lines into. The alternative (and less ambitious objective) was to reach the Meuse River and for this one too they failed.
With respect to the alleged torture this has never been demonstrated. Historian agree that there might have been mock trials and faked executions before the trial but no torture.
The incident is mentioned in a book on Joseph McCarthy called Blacklisted by History but only quickly in a few pages. . Here is the scrapbookers article about it Malmedy incident.
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/DachauTrials/MalmedyMassacre02.html
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Scrapbookpages website contains a lot of crap and inaccuracies about this story.
