Actually I now know what Majanek is. I watched Eric Hunts great video exposing the lies the propagandist showed when they filmed their version of the myths and lies of Majanek..
You see, you had me fooled. It would help your credibility if 1) you didn't rely on Hunt's video, which is a piece of deception and outright falsehood and 2) knew at least how to spell the camp's name, which is Majdanek, not Majanek as you wrote several times.
Much appreciated but you seem to have decided not to read the materials I linked you to where I showed that Hunt lied about camp arrival/entry to the bathhouses or to pay attention to where I told you another example of his tomfoolery was the distance between the gas chambers and crematory. Oh well.
You might imagine I've seen the video, since I linked you to a thread about it. For members with a high tolerance for pain and a degree of masochism,
here is a link to that thread; in the thread, a non-denier, Nessie, who fell for Hunt's video, finally gave up trying to defend it, and the arguments in defense of Hunt's video made by a denier named David as well as by the Black Rabbit of Inlé are refuted.
I think it is odd that a water well lies right in the middle of this place. Doesn't seem to be a place to put one if people are going to be murdered by the carloads and their body fluids flowing everywhere...
You may find it odd, but the evidence shows that there was a murder facility in the northeast corner of the Economics Sector, as pointed out above.
The subject of water in the camp vexed the SS authorities, in fact. Here are some indications of how much so:
DachauKZ website summary:
Particularly troublesome was the lack of water for prisoners. By the end of 1942, the water came from three wells (bores) to the camp. A representative of the Hygiene Institute of the Waffen-SS made an inspection of the camp in mid-April 1942: "The water supply of the POW Camp Lublin is inadequate and does not meet the requirements that have to be made due to health considerations. In the present circumstances there is a risk of disease for the camp and its surroundings". Even the connection of the camp to the municipal water and the sewer system did not solve the water problem, it often resulted in blockages and breaking of pipes. On 3 August In 1943 a representative of the WVHA in a protocol noted regarding the sanitary conditions: "The major problem in terms of hygiene in KL Lublin at the moment is the deficient supply of water, as the main pumping station of the waterworks Lublin has fallen in disrepair in the Moor, which is *part of the city."
Museum of Tolerance Learning Center note:
. . . the SS Hygiene Institute declared in 1942 that the water in Majdanek's wells was contaminated and undrinkable, the camp was not linked to Lublin's municipal waterworks until mid-1943; and there was no running water until autumn of that year.
Graf & Mattogno, p 167, quote from an early 1943, they say, underground report on Majdanek:
The unsanitary conditions are worsened further by the complete lack of water. The few wells on the camp grounds are closed, as they are said to have been contaminated by the typhus epidemic that raged in the camp recently. As a result, there is no water for washing or even for drinking; the one well by the kitchen provides at most one or two buckets of water for more than 400 people, and the dishes must be washed in that first. . . .
This suggests that, first, the camp had an insufficient number of wells, not just one, and that the camp water was indeed contaminated. I haven't studied Majdanek/Lublin area hydrology and don't know all the ways in which the water became contaminated. The camp authorities tried to solve the water problem in the camp by hooking in to Lublin's water supply. Which, as we can see, didn't fix the problem. The gassing operation began in late fall 1942; the hook-up to the Lublin system followed by some months.
So obviously that tells me Majanek wasn't a death camp as the usual players here want you to believe...
What this statement of yours is called is a "strawman," in that you're pretending that I (or others here) have been presenting Majdanek as a death camp.
Majdanek was a camp originally built for Russian POWs. It came to serve a number of purposes: a camp for POWS and later a woeful medical facility for POWS; a place for internment of hostages; a penal camp for Polish resisters, for Belorussian and Polish peasant who failed to meet German grain quotas; a dying place for ill prisoners from other camps; an execution site for Polish prisoners held in Lublin and vicinity; a labor camp and source of laborers for camps in the Lublin area; a transit camp to move slave laborers to Auschwitz and other KLs; and a site for murdering Jews. It was not "a death camp"; I have not described it as such and I thank you for not putting words into my mouth in the future. Majdanek was constructed, at least the rudiments of the camp, in fall 1941 - the camp opened IIRC in October 1941, and the camp was liberated in July 1944. During that period of over 2-1/2 years, about 150,000 people passed through Majdanek, about half of them being Jews. The gas chambers, in which mainly Jews were murdered, operated from (probably) September 1942 through September 1943.
That said, your declaring that the camp was not a death camp doesn't offer any evidence against the murders carried out at Majdanek.
Another holohoax thrown upon the public using staged video production and camera angles that actually hide the true layout of the place....while hiding light coming in from copious window openings and a sink made to save lives and disinfect persons.
You may have something in mind - you will need to clarify if anyone is to understand what it is.
But this is what we expect from the holohoaxters....keep it coming and more of us will keep exposing the lies. Eric Hunt does a great job doing it.....
As you will recall, I told you that Hunt lied about the entry process for the bathhouses, and linked you to a number of posts showing how his entry claims are bogus, and that he also made misleading points about the proximity of the gas chambers to the cremation sites.
Now it is up to you to tell us why Hunt was right and how you think I am wrong. Repeating that Hunt does a great job doesn't answer what I've told you.
Last point: you say you know about Majdanek. Please, what historical books dealing with the camp have you read? Also how many testimonies about the camp, in whole or in part, are you familiar with? What investigations, legal materials or other sources have you used to familiarize yourself with the camp?