Those are only assumptions.....you have no idea why they were shot...you only assumed why...nice try...and yes the assumption you make is to me a stupid lie, I don't have to apologize, you didn't prove why they were shot. People are killed in American prisons for reasons when the legal system works against murders and rapist. I can ASSUME then these people shot were murders and rapist. I have no proof though, just like you, you have no proof why they were shot....if those people suppossedly shot were shot to hide the fact of the gassings, again, another stupid lie assumtion, then why do we know of this situation in the first place? Apparently the secret got out..lol.....but anyway nice try again with the "assumption" nonsense.. any other nonsense you want to show me?
Photographs need to have context and explanation, such as provenance, to be useful in understanding events, and also related documentation, which is why you have nothing to say about the Liepaja and Ponary photos we've shown, because we have other information about what happened and what they show.
Said to be made from Polish prisoners at Buchenwald, not Jews, not related to the Holocaust.
Well, that's an open mind for you . . .
Problem is that the research has been done, conclusions have been drawn from it - and, sadly for you, a lot of the most basic questions you keep raising have been answered. Until someone gives a good reason to question further. You haven't. You repeat issues long since dealt with.
Sadly for you, the model methodology and approach used by Joachim Neander in that article have led him to write about the Final Solution. For those interested, Neander has written also about the camp system, particularly Dora-Mittelbau, and his dissertation is quoted in recent work on that camp.
I won't bother to keep pointing out what you always ignore about Gringauz. Anyone reading the thread knows by now.
Look at the hatefull post against me, look at the terms you use. You people can't handle the truth and now attack me with Insults.....nice, how old are you?
I don't care what happened, you need to prove it. Assumptions don't prove facts they only prove the viewpoint of the writers to get fools to believe what they say...
No, I cited a report from the camp underground.
False, I actually have an "idea" why the 23 men were shot.
No, I tried understanding a piece of evidence in the context of other evidence.
Why am I not surprised?
Of course you don't. But you failed to answer what I asked you about the evidence and situation.
I didn't try to "prove" the 23 men were shot.
Do you seriously imagine that Majdanek was like an American prison? That "tiny" issue aside, can you cite for members of the forum a single case of 23 prisoners in a work gang in an American prison being executed on the spot for having committed a mass rape? Do you approve of mass executions on the spot in prisons?
You can assume anything you wish. Without evidence for what you assume, don't expect many people to agree with you.
I have evidence that can be most reasonably interpreted to say that the 23 men were shot to rotate SK crews. I asked if you had a better, evidence-based explanation. As you won't give one, I assume you have none or realize that what you think is absurd.
Because a secret organization inside the camp carried out secret intelligence work and reported on it. That is apparent from what I have explained. It is not that the Germans didn't care if people knew what was going on; it is that the underground worked to discover what the Germans were doing and was sometimes successful in doing so.
As secrets sometimes do. Your logic is like saying that the Engima machine ciphers never existed because the British cracked them!
Enjoying myself too much in this conversation to move along just now, in all honesty.
Ok, I'm responding, the holocaust is a fraud, if it wasn't you wouldn't have the nonsense of Jews to soap, Jews to lampshades, to wallets, to ashtrays. Real historical facts don't need these lies to back it up...the foundation of the holohax is these LIES. Some of these lies put people in jail or to their deaths. Re read that Danzig Soap Article. The soap I formation was used in the Nuremberg trials. That infomation worked on the emotions of the audience and the judges to later be used to hang people...shame, shame, shame, oh, by the way, thank you all for that Denzig Soap artilce, it was so good I printed it out. IT PROVES EVERYTHING the revisionist have been saying about the falsity of the soap story....Being in this forum has helped me immensely, thank you, thank you, thank you....
Are you a holocaust skeptic, yes or no? If not then you are in the wrong forum...
Sure those people matter, any of them talk about gas chambers?
Have any of you read any of the 40 books the revisionist put out debunking all your nonsense? Probably not one..We have the whole library....some people are just blessed....
He we go with the hate hate hate for having an opinion...