• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reality Check said:
Recorded lies are not a laughing matter, Bjarne:
The RR fantasy appearing on 15 October 2009 here, continued ignorance of high school level science and digging a pit of fantasies from Bjarne (82 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion in this thread alone!).
2 August 2016 Bjarne: A delusion that evidence that the inflationary model is invalid would be announced in a YouTube video.
2 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie by quote mining Professor George Etstahiou - cutting out a word he knows was spoken.
2 August 2016 Bjarne: Ignorance about inflation which is not "that the universe started with a singularity".
3 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie based on ignorance of the evidence that is the basis for [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)"]inflation and its confirmed prediction.[/URL]
5 August 2016 Bjarne: Repeats the lie about Etstahiou's quote by cutting the first word that he stated before was "As" :eek:!
5 August 2016 Bjarne: Repeats the delusion of "Your paradigm is more shaken than ever before"
5 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie about an alternative to solve imaginary "really big problems".
Click to expand...

Lol
 
Reality Check said:
I have read an ignorant PDF on your web site - is that the "paper", Bjarne?
However that PDF makes this reply into a lie - there is no list of inflation problems or your solutions in it :eek:! That would not be unexpected since you have lied about the content of that PDF before.
1 June 2016 Bjarne:A lie about a calculation of the direction and magnitude of the acceleration of space probes leaving the solar system, e.g. Voyager 1 and 2.
1 June 2016 Bjarne: A lie about a calculation of the direction and magnitude of the acceleration of space probes in a n Earth flyby.

5 August 2016 Bjarne: List the "really big problems" in inflation (that "paradigm") and show that you have a scientific solution to each of them.
Click to expand...



There several consequences of the paper, you can say these are written between the lines

One is that we soon are forced to change paradigm, the modified theory of relativity will contribute to that, this will also imply a new understanding of the nature of gravity and the opposite of that (so called dark energy), so here you have it.

Another consequence is the facts that even though after many people have read the paper and still don’t understand the problem with our paradigm and what really went wrong with it -, we can soon also use the paper as some kind of evidence to prove how many obsession and brain damage innocent students now is burden with, - after 100 years indoctrination and massive propaganda.
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
Lol
Click to expand...
Years of ignorance and fantasy and some lies is not a joke - it is a sign of a serious problem, Bjarne.
The RR fantasy appearing on 15 October 2009 here, continued ignorance of high school level science and digging a pit of fantasies from Bjarne (82 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion in this thread alone!).
2 August 2016 Bjarne: A delusion that evidence that the inflationary model is invalid would be announced in a YouTube video.
2 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie by quote mining Professor George Etstahiou - cutting out a word he knows was spoken.
2 August 2016 Bjarne: Ignorance about inflation which is not "that the universe started with a singularity".
3 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie based on ignorance of the evidence that is the basis for [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)"]inflation and its confirmed prediction.[/URL]
5 August 2016 Bjarne: Repeats the lie about Etstahiou's quote by cutting the first word that he stated before was "As" :eek:!
5 August 2016 Bjarne: Repeats the delusion of "Your paradigm is more shaken than ever before"
5 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie about an alternative to solve imaginary "really big problems".
 
Bjarne: A total fantasy that you have a list of "really big problems" in inflation

Bjarne said:
There several consequences of the paper, you can say these are written between the lines
Click to expand...
So it is a total fantasy yet again, Bjarne :jaw-dropp! Which changes the question to:
5 August 2016 Bjarne: A total fantasy that you have a list of the "really big problems" in inflation (that "paradigm") and solutions.

I doubt that you even know what the problems with inflation are :p!

9 August 2016 Bjarne: It is a lie that your PDF contains any "problem with our paradigm"
Fantasies and dark flow delusions cannot show a problem with anything in the real world.

9 August 2016 Bjarne:The ignorant delusion of "100 years indoctrination and massive propaganda"
 
Bjarne said:
So the electron is never virtual ?
Click to expand...
The electron is a real particle. The electrons in an atom as in your Planck quote are real particles. There are virtual particles. Virtual electron-positron pairs can be created and destroyed.

However you wrote an ignorant The strong force, is responsible for holding mass together assertion. The strong force holds the particles in an atomic nucleus together. Electromagnetism holds electrons in atoms and atoms in solids, liquids, gases and plasmas.
 
Last edited:
Reality Check said:
Years of ignorance and fantasy and some lies is not a joke - it is a sign of a serious problem, Bjarne.
The RR fantasy appearing on 15 October 2009 here, continued ignorance of high school level science and digging a pit of fantasies from Bjarne (82 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion in this thread alone!).
2 August 2016 Bjarne: A delusion that evidence that the inflationary model is invalid would be announced in a YouTube video.
2 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie by quote mining Professor George Etstahiou - cutting out a word he knows was spoken.
2 August 2016 Bjarne: Ignorance about inflation which is not "that the universe started with a singularity".
3 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie based on ignorance of the evidence that is the basis for [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)"]inflation and its confirmed prediction.[/URL]
5 August 2016 Bjarne: Repeats the lie about Etstahiou's quote by cutting the first word that he stated before was "As" :eek:!
5 August 2016 Bjarne: Repeats the delusion of "Your paradigm is more shaken than ever before"
5 August 2016 Bjarne: A lie about an alternative to solve imaginary "really big problems".
Click to expand...

1000 years of stubborn arrogant fanatic brainwashed omniscient intolerance, against everyone that dares to think against the mass hysteric indoctrinated mainstreams obsessions / paradigm
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
1000 years of stubborn arrogant fanatic brainwashed omniscient intolerance, against everyone that dares to think against the mass hysteric indoctrinated mainstreams obsessions / paradigm
Click to expand...

And GPS doesn't show orbit anomalies because . . . why again? You said because it wasn't polar, but GPS orbits are more polar than ISS. If ISS is going to be more accurate, well, why can't you say what accuracy is needed so we can find out if GPS is good enough or, for that matter, if ISS will be good enough?

But lacking that sort of thing, you're saying that everyone else is wrong but don't have any supporting evidence.

Meanwhile, my GPS works just fine.
 
Reality Check said:
The electron is a real particle. The electrons in an atom as in your Planck quote are real particles. There are virtual particles. Virtual electron-positron pairs can be created and destroyed.
Click to expand...

Quantum theory predicts that every particle spends some time as a combination of other particles in all possible ways.
a hydrogen atom an electron and a proton are bound together by photons (the quanta of the electromagnetic field). Every photon will spend some time as a virtual electron plus its antiparticle, the virtual positron, since this is allowed by quantum mechanics as described above.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-virtual-particles-rea/

However you wrote an ignorant The strong force, is responsible for holding mass together assertion. The strong force holds the particles in an atomic nucleus together. Electromagnetism holds electrons in atoms and atoms in solids, liquids, gases and plasmas.
Click to expand...

Gravity is a byproduct of the strong force, or if you prefer, - these 2 forces are united, also even though these are different.
I am pretty sure that the electromagnetic force also is united with the same process.

Many scientists believe so. Einstein too, he was working with equations to unite all the 4 forces even at his deadbed.

So in the ends of the day all you have is force and energy, acting in one and the same process.

But RC there is a lot many don’t know.. You see many believe 97 % of the universe is so called dark energy and dark matter, and the last 2,9999999999999999999999999 % is concrete in the head of many spending too long time at schools.

These "scientist" therefore only know 0,0000000000000000000000003 % of what the rest of universe is about.
 
Last edited:
dasmiller said:
And GPS doesn't show orbit anomalies because . . . why again? You said because it wasn't polar, but GPS orbits are more polar than ISS. If ISS is going to be more accurate, well, why can't you say what accuracy is needed so we can find out if GPS is good enough or, for that matter, if ISS will be good enough?

But lacking that sort of thing, you're saying that everyone else is wrong but don't have any supporting evidence.

Meanwhile, my GPS works just fine.
Click to expand...

The simple answer is that GPS is based on measured orbits, not on scientific calculated orbits.

The anomalies are already there, but not discovered.

So soon you systematic begin to compare these 2 sets of date, SR is dead,.

Off course calculation are done now and then, - but the system run based on measured orbit data..´

Notice only few polar satellites is expected to have significant anomalies.
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
The simple answer is that GPS is based on measured orbits, not on scientific calculated orbits.
Click to expand...

Yet again, this is simply wrong. That's not how GPS works.

So soon you systematic begin to compare these 2 sets of date, SR is dead,.
Click to expand...

So, no evidence right now?

Off course calculation are done now and then, - but the system run based on measured orbit data..´
Click to expand...

No. The system runs on predicted (calculated) orbits.
 
Bjarne said:
The simple answer is that GPS is based on measured orbits, not on scientific calculated orbits.

The anomalies are already there, but not discovered.

So soon you systematic begin to compare these 2 sets of date, SR is dead,.

Off course calculation are done now and then, - but the system run based on measured orbit data..´
Click to expand...

What exactly makes you think that?

Hans
 
Bjarne said:
1000 years of stubborn arrogant fanatic brainwashed omniscient intolerance, against everyone that dares to think against the mass hysteric indoctrinated mainstreams obsessions / paradigm
Click to expand...

To what end and purpose? 1,000 years of brainwashing? For what, exactly?
 
Bjarne said:
1000 years of stubborn arrogant fanatic brainwashed omniscient intolerance, against everyone that dares to think against the mass hysteric indoctrinated mainstreams obsessions / paradigm
Click to expand...

Do you have a red, nearly purple face and are you foaming at the mouth when you type that?
 
abaddon said:
To what end and purpose? 1,000 years of brainwashing? For what, exactly?
Click to expand...

For 1,000 years, people have been acting like that, only to prevent Bjarne from being recognized as 'the one true scientist who knows all the ins and outs of the universe'.
All the other crackpots are in on this as well.
 
Bjarne said:
The simple answer is that GPS is based on measured orbits, not on scientific calculated orbits.

The anomalies are already there, but not discovered.

So soon you systematic begin to compare these 2 sets of date, SR is dead,.

Off course calculation are done now and then, - but the system run based on measured orbit data..´

Notice only few polar satellites is expected to have significant anomalies.
Click to expand...


Citation needed.

Seriously. Citation needed.

Have you written up a paper on your research?

If so, where has it been submitted for publication?

If not, why not?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom