• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed Is Humayun Khan Trump's Turning Point?

Cleon said:
Of course you do. :rolleyes:



Other than a design straight from 1997, find anything scurrilous yet?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I added another link above. I gotta say, I'm always surprised at the lack of skepticism here at this website for skeptics.
 
Bob001 said:
One issue is that he was a very active athlete, playing football, tennis and squash without any evidence of medical issues. Another is that it was not uncommon in that era for draft-age males with the right connections -- and a billionaire's son would certainly qualify -- to find antiwar doctors who would attest to some minor but disqualifying condition. Sometimes the Army insisted on doing its own exam; sometimes not. I note that, until it was abolished in 1973, dealing with the draft was one of the most momentous events of a young man's life: It was literally a matter of life and death. But Trump claims he doesn't remember which foot was affected (later claiming both), or what doctor diagnosed him. I would have remembered and celebrated the name of any doc who kept me out of Nam.
Click to expand...

All of these comments make it quite plausible that the diagnosis was fake, though I would have preferred something a little more decisive before I said the diagnosis was fake.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Yeah, actually, they conveniently healed themselves when the war was over. Not to mention bone spurs are a specious excuse in the first place. Do you think a millionaire with a painful bone spur wouldn't have had it surgically corrected? It's a simple procedure.
Click to expand...

Bone spurs are supposed to be temporary, aren't they?

Look, Trump is a jerk and he probably lied about bone spurs, but the fact is that, no, you have no evidence that he lied. You have some arguments that it's pretty damned plausible he lied, but no evidence that the bone spurs were "fake".

Goodness, Ginger. He's a pathetic enough person that we might as well accuse him of what he obviously did, and not make up claims about what he probably did.
 
BrooklynBaby said:
eta: The Gateway Pundit
Click to expand...

Ah, yes. The Dumbest Man on the Internet.

suggests it could be he doesn't want anyone to know his position on Sharia Law.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...hizr-khan-deletes-law-firms-pay-play-website/
Click to expand...

From the image, Khan's position on "Sharia Law" is apparently that it's a thing that exists - it's nothing but a factual description of the various elements that make up the usul al-fiqh which could have been taken straight off of Wikipedia.

Is that it?
 
Last edited:
Cl1mh4224rd said:
The article claims the image is evidence of support for Sharia Law, but... I don't see it (ETA: the alleged support; I see the image itself).
Click to expand...



I seem to recall people screaming about Sharia Law when a couple McDonald's in Michigan were offering Halal items, so any acknowledgement of Muslim requirements is "Sharia Law".
The chemical company that I work for makes cleaning products for use on equipment in food processing plants. We have a number of them certified for use in Halal-certified facilities. Clearly we support Sharia Law as well.
 
Here is some information from Breitbart regarding Kahn's connections to Saudi Arabia and Hillary:

"What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information."

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...nancially-benefits-pay-play-muslim-migration/

eta: After reading the latest headlines, I wonder if Khan had anything to do with getting the $400 million to Iran for those 4 prisoners.
 
Last edited:
BrooklynBaby said:
Here is some information from Breitbart regarding Kahn's connections to Saudi Arabia and Hillary:

"What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information."

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...nancially-benefits-pay-play-muslim-migration/
Click to expand...
This is both seriously pathetic and typical Republican. You have the audacity to to complain about this being a skeptics forum then poop out this ****. Do you have a clue? Do you know that what you posted is 100% not relevant to the issue? Do you? Why is this crap being posted? Simple, Mr. Skeptic, it's a childish and pathetic attempt to change the topic. Hey Mr. Skeptic, guess what logical fallacy that is? Your man crapped all over the parents of a dead American soldier and you post this ****** Your team has no class, no integrity.
 
Last edited:
BrooklynBaby said:
Here is some information from Breitbart regarding Kahn's connections to Saudi Arabia and Hillary:

"What’s perhaps interesting is that also on this website that he has now deleted, Khan revealed that he spent nearly a decade working for the mega-D.C. law firm Hogan & Hartson—now Hogan Lovells LLP—which connects him directly with the government of Saudi Arabia and the Clintons themselves. Saudi Arabia, which has retained the firm that Khan worked at for years, has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary Clinton, despite the repeated urging of Trump, has refused to return the Clinton Cash money to the Saudis. What’s more, Hogan Lovells also did Hillary Clinton’s taxes—and helped acquire the patents for parts of the technology she used in crafting her illicit home-brew email server that the FBI director called “extremely careless” in handling classified information."

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...nancially-benefits-pay-play-muslim-migration/

eta: After reading the latest headlines, I wonder if Khan had anything to do with getting the $400 million to Iran for those 4 prisoners.
Click to expand...

Are you as equally worried about Chief Justice John Roberts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom