The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
RussDill said:
So your testable prediction is that what we call relativistic mass is not frame dependent, it only depends on velocity relative to the "dark flow", correct?
Click to expand...

This shows you have not read the article http://science27.com/paper.pdf

SR frames can only be correct understood based on a overall motion reference frame.

GR frames are correct when it comes to time dilation, but orbit anomalies is not caused by so called curvature of space,
GR is not the correct theory for gravity.

Kinematic orbit anomalies such as...
  • The pioneer anomalies.
  • Flyby anomalies
  • Galaxy collapse (so called black holes)
  • Perihelion precisions anomalies
  • And a lot more
... are all caused by due to change of matter/space connection (Environment change), and here is relativistic mass a keyword , - that have to be properly understood.
 
fuelair said:
I have a suspicion that somehow we have neglected to explain to you that You Tube is actually not a highly trustworthy and definitely is not an acceptable record of actual scientific discovery/findings. Quote real sources if you want any chance of not being laughed at.
Click to expand...

There are many stupid reason for not accepting facts.. Its nothing wrong with Youtube, but rather with some people using it.
The video I refer to is very serious

For example this ESA video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eavab9siYg

Take a watch boy
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
Who say I deny signal sent by GPS satellites are effected by item dilatation ?
The important thing is altitude and gravitational anomalies. Its not the task of a GPS team to analyse such, but just set the auto calibration of clocks correct.
You have serveral other factors that also can be estimated wrong..
Click to expand...

And how exactly do you propose they should be able to do that if the science behind is not correct? If you don't know what influences your clock, how can you program an auto-correction?

Hans
 
Bjarne said:
SR frames, - yes forget what you have learn..
GR frames are allright
Click to expand...

Bjarne, seriously: Why should we do that? Because you say so?

You can't even explain your own theories properly. You obviously don't understand the science you are trying to replace.

Should we forget everything you don't understand?

Sorry, but we won't.

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
And how exactly do you propose they should be able to do that if the science behind is not correct? If you don't know what influences your clock, how can you program an auto-correction?

Hans
Click to expand...

Sorry I lie'
Computers are doing this, without asking any question .
Like the clock is set on you pc too, without asking anyone
 
Last edited:
MRC_Hans said:
Bjarne, seriously: Why should we do that? Because you say so?

You can't even explain your own theories properly. You obviously don't understand the science you are trying to replace.

Should we forget everything you don't understand?

Sorry, but we won't.

Hans
Click to expand...

I understand it very well, and this is why you can't get me trapped, - even though there is such much, (you call science) that is threaten to be thrown out of the window.
 
MRC_Hans said:
Yes, stuff from ESA usually is. And it is also very interesting. Now, please explain how this information in any way supports your claims.

Hans
Click to expand...

I thought you already knew, - it’s not only a modified theory of relativity rather a theory of everything, - but of pedagogical reasons, it is better to go stepwise forward..

As follows...

1.) Bring down the prevailing SR ( and modify SR)
2.) Bring down the idea that GR is the cause of gravity
3.) Dark matter and black holes mysteries are then automatically solved.
4.) as you see, - last step is to show that Big Bang was not the start of everything, there was something before..- And at this point you have to ask what was that something" and why did it explode?

We have already discussed that last aspect of the theory, I have not much more to add.
 
Relativity works and matches predictions. This crap doesn't. Until it does, it won't be taken seriously.
 
Bjarne said:
One more lie
Click to expand...

Lie to yourself as much as you like, it won't change a thing. Heck, if you had worked out the properties of your elastic space you might even be able to say if it results in a flat or curved space-time. If you can't even agree with just yourself and take yourself seriously enough to actually try doing the work how can, and why should, anyone else?
 
Bjarne said:
SR frames, - yes forget what you have learn..
GR frames are allright
Click to expand...


Uhm, you do understand that Special Relativity is just a particular case of relativity (inertial reference frames) and that General Relativity is just the general application to include also non-inertial frames? In other words General Relativity explicitly subsumes Special Relativity. As "SR frames" are a subset of "GR frames" they are by your assertion above "allright". Again do please get back to use when you can at least agree with just yourself.
 
Bjarne said:
SR frames can only be correct understood based on a overall motion reference frame.
Click to expand...

Incorrect, if you want to claim that you don't understand them without your "overall motion reference frame" that's fine and perhaps something we can help you with. However, your limitations do not imbue anyone else with the same lack of understanding.


Bjarne said:
GR frames are correct when it comes to time dilation, but orbit anomalies is not caused by so called curvature of space,
GR is not the correct theory for gravity.
Click to expand...

Once again, is your elastic space flat or curved? As there is nothing inherent in elasticity that prevents curvature it would have to be a consequence of how your elastic space actually works. By all means please let us know when you actually work that out and please show your work.
 
Bjarne said:
Sorry I lie'
Computers are doing this, without asking any question .
Like the clock is set on you pc too, without asking anyone
Click to expand...

Funny, my PC asked me when I set it up. Whom do you suppose programmed those computers, just other computers? Who do you think set the time zones my PC asked me about when I set it up? You're not lying, you just don't know what you are talking about.

Also I will caution you as to referring to other posters as lairs or as "boy".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom