Merged Wikileaks DNC leak proves primary was rigged /DNC planned to use Sanders' religion ag

Tony Stark said:
Having the second place finisher compete in the GE would help the other party no matter who the nominee was. As I said, that is why the parties run only one nominee each.
Click to expand...

This isn't about the other person. This is about your lack of confidence in your candidate's policies that they cannot withstand the slightest adversity.
 
BobTheCoward said:
This isn't about the other person. This is about your lack of confidence in your candidate's policies that they cannot withstand the slightest adversity.
Click to expand...
The second place finisher of the primary running in the GE isn't just slight adversity and would help the other party no matter who the candidate was. Again, this is why parties only have one nominee. Because splitting the vote is completely moronic and helps your enemies.
 
This is Assange's explanation?
I have had years of experience in dealing with Hillary Clinton and have read thousands of her cables...Hillary's problem is not just that she's war hawk. She's a war hawk with bad judgement who gets an unseemly emotional rush out of killing people. She shouldn't be let near a gun shop, let alone an army.
Click to expand...

First of all, he claims to have had "years of experience dealing with Hillary Clinton" but I doubt he's ever even met her. What does "dealing with her" mean? Watching her on TV?

She's a war hawk who gets off on killing people? That's a pretty extreme opinion, one that I'm sure very very few people would agree with.

My problem with Assange is this: If he wants to hack government and political group files and then make them public, okay. But when he begins targeting specific people, then he's making judgement calls and he's no different than any other political operative. Then I want to know more about him, about how he's forming those judgements, how he came to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton is more of "a war hawk" than Donald Trump. Or Vladimir Putin.

I'd like to see him release his private emails. Did anyone ever ask him?
 
Tony Stark said:
The second place finisher of the primary running in the GE isn't just slight adversity and would help the other party no matter who the candidate was. Again, this is why parties only have one nominee. Because splitting the vote is completely moronic and helps your enemies.
Click to expand...

It can split the vote big or it can split it small. You lack the confidence that it would split it small. If it would split it big, I wouldn't be worried about the split. I would be more worried that I backed a person terrible for America .
 
newyorkguy said:
This is Assange's explanation?


First of all, he claims to have had "years of experience dealing with Hillary Clinton" but I doubt he's ever even met her. What does "dealing with her" mean? Watching her on TV?

She's a war hawk who gets off on killing people? That's a pretty extreme opinion, one that I'm sure very very few people would agree with.

My problem with Assange is this: If he wants to hack government and political group files and then make them public, okay. But when he begins targeting specific people, then he's making judgement calls and he's no different than any other political operative. Then I want to know more about him, about how he's forming those judgements, how he came to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton is more of "a war hawk" than Donald Trump. Or Vladimir Putin.

I'd like to see him release his private emails. Did anyone ever ask him?
Click to expand...
He's a total scumbag. But that is to be expected from someone who has been hiding out from rape charges for years.

As I posted before, there was all kinds of private information (social security numbers, credit card numbers, ect) in these emails and he doesn't give the slightest **** that he out it put there for anyone in the world to find.
 
BobTheCoward said:
It can split the vote big or it can split it small. You lack the confidence that it would split it small. If it would split it big, I wouldn't be worried about the split. I would be more worried that I backed a person terrible for America .
Click to expand...
Even a small split helps the other side.
 
Tony Stark said:
Ok. Cool. I thought you were hoping for something really damaging.
Click to expand...

I find the events taking place extremely interesting. What we have is an election shaping up where one candidate has come under an FBI investigation and the other is an utter asshat. Some polls suggest the winner will not be the one liked the most, it will be the one despised the least. Combine that with Russia and WikiLeaks trying to throw a wrench in the works in favor of Trump?

This is fun.
 
AJM8125 said:
I find the events taking place extremely interesting. What we have is an election shaping up where one candidate has come under an FBI investigation and the other is an utter asshat. Some polls suggest the winner will not be the one liked the most, it will be the one despised the least. Combine that with Russia and WikiLeaks trying to throw a wrench in the works in favor of Trump?

This is fun.
Click to expand...
I don't see what's so fun about that worthless piece of garage having any shot at being the President.
 
Sanders has moved on. He's stated quite clearly today the focus needs to be on beating Trump. Sanders wants HRC to be elected. He's not crying and whining.

Sanders has moved on, why can't you guys? Is Sanders wrong, deluded, sold out? Make your case why Sanders needs to take off his big boy pants start crying and whining?
 
The Atheist said:
Cares enough to let the party crap all over them? That's some serious caring going on.

Or, as it looks to me, he's decided that he will accept the rip-off in return for sainthood if Billary wins.

What if she loses? What does that make him?
Click to expand...

I'm sorry but yout don't really understand what is going on. There's a huge difference between the DNC and the Democratic party. The RNC actively worked against Trump until it was clear that he could win the nomination

DWS owes everything to the Clintons. It is no secret that she favored Hillary. But she isn't one of 40 something Democratic Senators that Bernie works with every day in the Senate. The DNC is not part of the government in any way.

Trust me, there may have been a time when Bernie was upset but at this point he could care less.
 
Tony Stark said:
Because don't I want Donald Trump to be the President of the United States.
Click to expand...

What I like about representative democracy is I am wrong a lot. I put my ideas out there, and representative go through a gauntlet sharpening our ideas. Then I and millions of others cast a vote. Often, the person I voted for doesn't win. And I am grateful. I am grateful because as best we know how, the people have a representative as best we could hope for in this election we all have a stake in.

If Hillary wins , good. If Trump wins, good. That means we head down the path not that want, but what the people as a whole want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom