Merged Wikileaks DNC leak proves primary was rigged /DNC planned to use Sanders' religion ag

“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess.” This email’s header, according to Wikileaks, says, “From:markpaustenbach@gmail.com To: mirandal@dnc.org.”

Gee, I wonder?

:D

Anyone get the latest spin from correct the record yet? Give me a big "amen" when you do.
 
Tony, you claimed that the plan proposed by one top staffer and that got a resounding AMEN from the CEO (the *********** CEO!) was "never executed."

Surely, Tony Stark you have support for this.

TICK TOCK TONY!
How I am supposed to prove a negative? The complete and total lack of evidence that they actually did it is enough for any sane person conclude it never happened. You want sane people to believe your crazed conspiracy theory of the primary being rigged, prove it.

Yeah didn't think so.
 
“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess.” This email’s header, according to Wikileaks, says, “From:markpaustenbach@gmail.com To: mirandal@dnc.org.”

Gee, I wonder?

:D

Anyone get the latest spin from correct the record yet? Give me a big "amen" when you do.
OMG, after Bernie had very clearly lost, the DNC pushed back against conspiracy theories about everything being rigged.

You have nothing.
 
BWHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! Oh man, it just don't get better than that. An admission that top DNC staff was working on Clinton's campaign...

To quote DNC CEO Amy Dacey: AMEN!!

Again, yawn This is typical and not a surprise to anyone with a clue.
 
So your "evidence" that they rigged the primary against Bernie is a plan one guy came up with and that they never executed?

On par with the usual "evidence" you post for your crazed conspiracy theories.

How I am supposed to prove a negative? The complete and total lack of evidence that they actually did it is enough for any sane person conclude it never happened. You want sane people to believe your crazed conspiracy theory of the primary being rigged, prove it.

Yeah didn't think so.

Just a few hours ago, he confidently stated that it was "never executed.'

And now it turns out her just made that up.

Oh well.

Can I get an AMEN?

AMEN!
 
You don't understand politics. You've never worked in a campaign. This kind of crap is kicked around by supporters all the time. Usually out of the earshot of their candidate because they know that the candidate themselves would get pissed and even possibly fire them. Also, they almost never carry them out...that is unless they worked for Richard Nixon.

In the end, the candidate sets the tone of a campaign. And if you're honest, not that I expect you to be, you would have to conclude that the campaign on the Democratic side was extremely civil.

Again, yawn This is typical and not a surprise to anyone with a clue.
:confused:

You confused the DNC leadership with Hillary's campaign.... talk about not having a clue!!

AMEN!
 
Just a few hours ago, he confidently stated that it was "never executed.'

And now it turns out her just made that up.

Oh well.

Can I get an AMEN?

AMEN!
And you again fail to even attempt to prove your conspiracy theory.
 
:confused:

You confused the DNC leadership with Hillary's campaign.... talk about not having a clue!!

AMEN!

No, I didnt. You obviously are naive and think the rest of us should be shocked by this news. We're not.
 
No, I didnt. You obviously are naive and think the rest of us should be shocked by this news. We're not.
He's just trying to stir up discord on the left and get people to abandon Hillary. Just like what Trump is doing. He doesn't actually care about any of this for any reason besides that.
 
say Tony, rather than dodge, kindly advise everyone where you came up with the claim that it was "never executed"?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

AMEN!
The complete and total lack of evidence.

Feel free to prove your conspiracy theory at any time (lol).
 
No, I didnt. You obviously are naive and think the rest of us should be shocked by this news. We're not.

Yes, obviously you did.

although I am fascinated by the thought that you expected the DNC to openly collude ith Hillary's campaign and to attack Bernie.
 
I'm a big Bernie fan and a very harsh critic of Clinton. Anyone's who's read my posts knows that. It was no secret Wasserman-Shultz and the DNC wanted Clinton, and the Dems need to make some reforms, but that's not why Bernie lost.

In the end, I think people were just too afraid the country wouldn't elect a really old Jewish socialist. Bernie represented too many "firsts". Maybe if the GOP had gone with a more conventional candidate, Bernie would have done better, but when the GOP race got down to Trump, Cruz, and Kasich (I think that was in March), it was pretty clear it was going to be Trump, and Trump had to be defeated and people saw Bernie as just too risky. He couldn't close the pledged delegate/popular vote gap. That's my reading of why he lost.
 
yes, we know you have shown a total lack of evidence for your claim it was "never executed."

AMEN!!

[emoji106]:D[emoji106]
The complete and total lack of evidence that it happened means that there is no reason for sane people to believe it happened.

Feel free to prove your conspiracy theory at any time
 
I'm a big Bernie fan and a very harsh critic of Clinton. Anyone's who's read my posts knows that. It was no secret Wasserman-Shultz and the DNC wanted Clinton, and the Dems need to make some reforms, but that's not why Bernie lost.

In the end, I think people were just too afraid the country wouldn't elect a really old Jewish socialist. Bernie represented too many "firsts". Maybe if the GOP had gone with a more conventional candidate, Bernie would have done better, but when the GOP race got down to Trump, Cruz, and Kasich (I think that was in March), it was pretty clear it was going to be Trump, and Trump had to be defeated and people saw Bernie as just too risky. He couldn't close the pledged delegate/popular vote gap. That's my reading of why he lost.
But you see, there was an email about trying out him as an atheist. Despite the fact that there is no evidence whatsoever that this plan happened, it proves the primary was rigged and Bernie Sanders is the rightful winner.

/whackjob conspiracy theorist "logic".
 
Yes, obviously you did.

although I am fascinated by the thought that you expected the DNC to openly collude ith Hillary's campaign and to attack Bernie.

No I wasn't. I've been around Democratic politics for 40 years. The DNC has been more on HRC's side since the very beginning and so was pretty much the entire Democratic party establishment. And given that Bernie has not been a member of the party until very recently, would you really expect otherwise?
 
Last edited:
No I wasn't. I've been around Democratic politics for 40 years. The DNC has been more on HRC's side since the very beginning and so was pretty much the entire Democratic party establishment. And given that Bernie has not been a member of the party until very recently, would you really expect otherwise?

You really aren't helping yourself:

From:MARSHALL@dnc.org
To: MirandaL@dnc.org,PaustenbachM@dnc.org, DaceyA@dnc.org
Date: 2016-05-05 03:31
Subject: No s—
It might may no difference, but for KY [Kentucky] and WVA [West Virginia} can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

The email was sent to DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda and Deputy Communications Director Mark Paustenbach and chief executive officer Amy Lacey.
Another Marshall email, The Post reported, time-stamped a few minutes later, says, “It’s these Jesus thing.”
A few hours later, Lacey reportedly responds: “Amen.”

The fact that Shillaries have failed to condemn this ugly faith based attack is utterly remarkable.

Oh well, they have been around the Democrats for a long time, they are used to it.

Amen!
 
You really aren't helping yourself:



The email was sent to DNC Communications Director Luis Miranda and Deputy Communications Director Mark Paustenbach and chief executive officer Amy Lacey.
Another Marshall email, The Post reported, time-stamped a few minutes later, says, “It’s these Jesus thing.”
A few hours later, Lacey reportedly responds: “Amen.”

The fact that Shillaries have failed to condemn this ugly faith based attack is utterly remarkable.

Here is me, on the first page, before you even brought it up.

I'm curious what is so bad. That after Bernie clearly lost the race they were pushing back against conspiracy theories about how everything was rigged against him?

The only thing I have a problem with is one staffer having a plan to try to out him as an atheist. Though it seems they never went through with it.

Are you ever going to provide evidence that they actually did it. LOL, of course not.

Oh well, they have been around the Democrats for a long time, they are used to it.

Amen!

Aren't you supposed to be pretending that you're a Democrat, or have you dropped that obvious BS entirely?

Oops!

LOL
 
Here is me, on the first page, before you even brought it up.

Are you ever going to provide evidence that they actually did it. LOL, of course not.

Aren't you supposed to be pretending that you're a Democrat, or have you dropped that obvious BS entirely?

Oops!

LOL

Oops! You have been claiming that it was one guy and they never went through with it, despite the first being utterly false and the later being something you flat made up?

Amen!
 

Back
Top Bottom