- Status
Archie Gemmill Goal
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 8,324
Actually the EU was well progressed in negotiations for a FTA with NZ so we've actually ditched our commonwealth kids by ditching the EU
I see. We've to beg nicely, eh? Was that part of the "option" too?
So we should encourage increased immigration of "commonwealth kids"? I'm sure we can get some more from Nigeria or Pakistan if we need them, and we will!
What are OEs?
Ah, no freedom of movement. Just trade. The "Goldilocks option" that other countries will presumably line up to grant us. Well very rightly the EU says no.
Ah, so the Commonwealth is "most young Kiwis, Aussies and Saffers" I thought as much.
But what about the Nigerians and Pakistanis?
I wonder if you're taking this discussion seriously, cullennz.
Maybe you should drop a note to Nigel Farage, with your migration solution, and he can come back and be leader of his Party again.
But what about the Nigerians and Pakistanis?
I wonder if you're taking this discussion seriously, cullennz.
Maybe you should drop a note to Nigel Farage, with your migration solution, and he can come back and be leader of his Party again.
Last edited:
Thank you.
I had fun on mine by the way.
First 2 months living in a house full of 18 odd antipodeans before finding your feet.
70 pound a week for a bed
60 for the floor next to it
Half the people doing night work so you could expect the lounge to be permanently awake.
Was good at 20 but by geezes I would never do it again
First 2 months living in a house full of 18 odd antipodeans before finding your feet.
70 pound a week for a bed
60 for the floor next to it
Half the people doing night work so you could expect the lounge to be permanently awake.
Was good at 20 but by geezes I would never do it again
Then how are you expecting whole industries and services to be sustained by employees drawn from this source? I think perhaps you're pulling our legs a bit, to cheer us up in this sad period of social and economic distress occasioned by mindless xenophobia.
I'm stating that this is the problem. You're saying we can have free trade without free movement of people and employment. You can imagine it, but you can't get it from the EU, so to discuss one of these subjects is to discuss the other.
You want trade with "the Commonwealth" which means letting "most" young (does "most" mean "White"?) NZ, Australian and S African "kids" work in the UK when they feel like it, and who will sleep on the floor while employed in West End London pubs. But Nigerian and Pakistani adult workers: well, you're not talking about them. You're just talking about trade. Like, thingeys.
And I'm saying, are your arguments pleasantries introduced for amusement purposes into a discussion of this difficult and sombre subject, in order to cheer us up?
I haven't read it even once. What does it say? I'm glad you'll get a good price for lamb, but I still think you haven't quite grasped the scope of this economic issue.
- Status