The existence of God and the efficacy of prayer

Believe and respect and/or do good things, and one MAY get a reward.

I disagree with you here.

I would say in the words of Rabia (a Persian saint)

"If I love Thee for fear of some burning hell,
then burn me in that hell.

If I love Thee for want of some paradise,
then deny me that paradise.

But as I love Thee for Thy Sake alone,
then deny me not Thy Everlasting Beatitude. " :)
 
Worship matters because the Universal Being created conscious beings to have physical experiences with the created universes, i.e., for the Universal Being's own play. It enters into the universes and then looks back at Itself and this is possible by love.

And you know this because it told you? Stronger evidence should be required; your low-bar is an infant's Olympics.

The 21st Century Grunge Mystic Band, The Smashing Pumpkins put it this way:

"Emptiness is loneliness
and loneliness is cleanliness
and cleanliness is godliness,
and god is empty just like me."
 
And you know this because it told you? Stronger evidence should be required; your low-bar is an infant's Olympics.

The 21st Century Grunge Mystic Band, The Smashing Pumpkins put it this way:

"Emptiness is loneliness
and loneliness is cleanliness
and cleanliness is godliness,
and god is empty just like me."

:eye-poppi You want me to have your lunch for you!

To get the evidence, you have to have the experience.
The way is easy but not everyone is interested.
The way is to sincerely ask "who am I? and feverishly search for the answer.
 
:eye-poppi You want me to have your lunch for you!

To get the evidence, you have to have the experience.
The way is easy but not everyone is interested.
The way is to sincerely ask "who am I? and feverishly search for the answer.

Feverish searches result in feverish answers- sincerity of the question is no guarantee of the answer's accuracy. I recommend science's cooler, more empirical and objective approach.
 
To get the evidence, you have to have the experience.
What exactly are mind-altering experiences evidence of?

That mind-altering conditions alter minds.

I am already aware of that, so no, an individual doesn't need to have one to know that. But also, that fact is not in dispute and among the subjects here. The issue here is what causes these mind alterations. And having one yourself does not impart any knowledge on that subject to you. It isn't evidence of anything about that question at all.
 
:eye-poppi You want me to have your lunch for you!

No; however, you need nourishment.

To get the evidence, you have to have the experience.

That would lead to evidence of an experience. Now you stand exposed; do you seek answers or comfort? The way of answers is the hard road; the narrow way of doubt repeated unto essence by filters of effort.

The way is easy but not everyone is interested.
The way is to sincerely ask "who am I? and feverishly search for the answer.

You take the easy way, up the navel into delusion. It is no surprise that you feel a fever; it's damp and warm in the bowels of faith.
 
Navigator,

I think that all the atheists and agnostics in this thread accept that one can have strong emotional experiences that if you are primed in the appropriate way will seem to be mystical.

We are saying that these are evidence of nothing more than the fact that the mind is prone to such experiences. Many situations can increase the chances of such experiences. For example, being in a group of people who are searching for spiritual experiences, meditation, lack of sleep, drugs, some medical conditions.

Humans are good at spotting patterns, and the evolutionary pressure has been to maximise sensitivity, even at the expense of getting false positives. It's better to mistake a log for a snake than the other way round.

Such spiritual experiences can be powerful but they have perfectly rational non-supernatural explanations and no reason to invoke anything more to explain them.
 
Here's one example of someone who experienced a haunting and found a rational and repeatable explanation for thos,but which would have been beyond the knowledge of most people for the vast majority of human history.

http://www.skepdic.com/infrasound.html
 
Here's one example of someone who experienced a haunting and found a rational and repeatable explanation for thos,but which would have been beyond the knowledge of most people for the vast majority of human history.

http://www.skepdic.com/infrasound.html

That's exactly the kind of thing that could be explored, and already has been explored I'm sure, where drumming is done during rituals in an area that naturally adds infrasound to audible drumming, like caves or massive stone structures.

If the majority of ancient participants sensed something paranormal, the group would conclude it was doing the ritual "right" and that spirits/gods could be summoned. We're still discovering how all these accidental discoveries work.

jimbob said:
I think that all the atheists and agnostics in this thread accept that one can have strong emotional experiences that if you are primed in the appropriate way will seem to be mystical.

We are saying that these are evidence of nothing more than the fact that the mind is prone to such experiences. Many situations can increase the chances of such experiences. For example, being in a group of people who are searching for spiritual experiences, meditation, lack of sleep, drugs, some medical conditions.

Humans are good at spotting patterns, and the evolutionary pressure has been to maximise sensitivity, even at the expense of getting false positives. It's better to mistake a log for a snake than the other way round.

Such spiritual experiences can be powerful but they have perfectly rational non-supernatural explanations and no reason to invoke anything more to explain them.

That sums up my stance very nicely, better than I could do. Thanks.
 
Navigator,

I think that all the atheists and agnostics in this thread accept that one can have strong emotional experiences that if you are primed in the appropriate way will seem to be mystical.

We are saying that these are evidence of nothing more than the fact that the mind is prone to such experiences. Many situations can increase the chances of such experiences. For example, being in a group of people who are searching for spiritual experiences, meditation, lack of sleep, drugs, some medical conditions.

Humans are good at spotting patterns, and the evolutionary pressure has been to maximise sensitivity, even at the expense of getting false positives. It's better to mistake a log for a snake than the other way round.

Such spiritual experiences can be powerful but they have perfectly rational non-supernatural explanations and no reason to invoke anything more to explain them.

I don't think Navigator is active on this thread jimbob.
 
In fairness, Navigator and PartSkeptic are hard to tell apart. They are both promoting largely similar opinions.

True enough, one is partially skeptical, and the other partially agnostic, about something that is difficult to nail down.

Ynot just popped into this thread now and I am wondering if he is omnipresent. This is scary stuff, we are surrounded by gods it would seem.

Loved you're post however ynot.:D
 
Navigator,

I think that all the atheists and agnostics in this thread accept that one can have strong emotional experiences that if you are primed in the appropriate way will seem to be mystical.

We are saying that these are evidence of nothing more than the fact that the mind is prone to such experiences. Many situations can increase the chances of such experiences. For example, being in a group of people who are searching for spiritual experiences, meditation, lack of sleep, drugs, some medical conditions.

Humans are good at spotting patterns, and the evolutionary pressure has been to maximise sensitivity, even at the expense of getting false positives. It's better to mistake a log for a snake than the other way round.

Such spiritual experiences can be powerful but they have perfectly rational non-supernatural explanations and no reason to invoke anything more to explain them.

I don't think Navigator is active on this thread jimbob.

In fairness, Navigator and PartSkeptic are hard to tell apart. They are both promoting largely similar opinions.

Indeed...

PartSkeptic, would you care to comment on my post?
 
If we could have just one thing pointing to the existence of a god it would be most impressive.

One thing that was absolutely perfect would do just fine but we are surrounded by imperfection wherever we care to look. There is beauty certainly, (well beauty from our perception), but perfection - no way.

If planet Earth was the center of Gods attention why could he not make something perfect, and therefore unique, about the place. He could have made our orbit, about the Sun, a perfect circle. That would be impressive.
 
What else would you call perfect, other than a circular orbit in a universe of mostly elliptical ones?
 
What else would you call perfect, other than a circular orbit in a universe of mostly elliptical ones?

All elliptical ones of varying eccentricity.

Well there are many other examples, the tilt of the axis could be precisely one half of a radian for example, (one radian would be too much to maintain our climatic conditions). The Earth rotation time being precisely a unit number, in relation to our orbit about the sun, (no leap years and clock adjustments necessary). I could go on.

Doing something like this would be a snap for a god who knew what he was about.
 
Navigator,

I think that all the atheists and agnostics in this thread accept that one can have strong emotional experiences that if you are primed in the appropriate way will seem to be mystical.

We are saying that these are evidence of nothing more than the fact that the mind is prone to such experiences. Many situations can increase the chances of such experiences. For example, being in a group of people who are searching for spiritual experiences, meditation, lack of sleep, drugs, some medical conditions.

Humans are good at spotting patterns, and the evolutionary pressure has been to maximise sensitivity, even at the expense of getting false positives. It's better to mistake a log for a snake than the other way round.

Such spiritual experiences can be powerful but they have perfectly rational non-supernatural explanations and no reason to invoke anything more to explain them.


You asked me to respond.

First - Navigator and I are two different people. He seems to be a tolerant agnostic.

I have spent a lot of time trying to find natural explanations for what seem to me to be supernatural events. While I cannot rule out the fact that every one of them may have had some natural explanation, there are a lot that do not fit any of the categories.

People can try to do so, but to me it is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. To do so, they shave and distort the facts.

The most common dismissal I read of is the one stating that my experiences are nothing unusual, and give a personal counter-example. I know of such examples, and they are not equivalent. There is an assumption that all people are the same, and that delusions and hallucinations can happen anywhere at any time.

What I find strange is that, although members claim delusions and hallucinations are commonplace, I am not subject to them with regard to anything that was not connected to spirit in some way. {{I suppose I will get told that that is only because of confirmation bias - that I forget the "ordinary" events - to which I reply "tish-tosh", you do not know me}}

The majority of my events were when I was wide awake, thinking normally, and not in strange circumstances. No drugs, no meditation, no lack of sleep, and I am very healthy. My mental functioning used to be way above average, and while now lower, still is.

Spotting patterns in random sounds or sights is something I am not good at. I do not "see" shapes in clouds, or trees, or even in pictures that are hiding some subliminal image. I am good at analyzing problems to find solutions, but that is logic.
 
If we could have just one thing pointing to the existence of a god it would be most impressive.

One thing that was absolutely perfect would do just fine but we are surrounded by imperfection wherever we care to look. There is beauty certainly, (well beauty from our perception), but perfection - no way.

If planet Earth was the center of Gods attention why could he not make something perfect, and therefore unique, about the place. He could have made our orbit, about the Sun, a perfect circle. That would be impressive.

It would indeed be impressive - but seasons are good. :)

How about making the year exactly, say, 360 days?
 

Back
Top Bottom