Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
bytewizard said:
Gerry counts, but I don't think Palin counts as a "woman" to most liberals because she is conservative and republican. The same would be true if an African-American was selected by Trump- just another Uncle Tom. For that matter, Trump could select a transgendered, black female as his VP and would be called a panderer.
Click to expand...

Conservative or not, Palin would have counted had she been an actually viable candidate. Instead she turned out to be wholly unqualified.
 
bytewizard said:
The definition of "always" must have changed and only you were notified. I will adjust my memory banks accordingly.
Click to expand...

Do you not converse with actual human people a lot?

For example when someone does something I dislike with great frequency and I blow up and say "you always do that!" am I actually literally saying that they have only ever done that to the exclusion of all other things? Or am I making a point of emphasis that it happens more than it should?
 
Bill Clinton’s Secret Meeting With AG Lynch Draws Suspicions

A recently uncovered private meeting between former President Bill Clinton and Lynch is drawing suspicions to the cause and subject matter of their meeting, considering the delicate legal situation between the Attorney General and the former president’s wife.

The meeting could be considered highly suspicious, and raises many ethical questions as to whether or not a federal prosecutor should be meeting with the family member of someone who is under criminal investigation.

Read more:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/bill-clintons-secret-meeting-with-ag-lynch-draws-suspicions/ (June 29, 2016)
Click to expand...


Lynch claimed the two did not speak about the ongoing criminal investigation into Crooked Hillary’s gross negligent handling of top secret classified information. "Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren," the attorney general said.

When asked to comment about Monday's clandestine meeting, the former President fell back on his standard refrain: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lynch."
 
Last edited:
So what is the conspiracy theory going to be when there is no indictment for Hillary? Perhaps Bill gave Loretta Lynch a bribe during the meeting on the plane? Or maybe Bill reminded Lynch that she owes him her career (Bill appointed her US Attorney) and so she can't indict Hillary. Oops, I bet Slings and Arrows and most of the other CDS sufferers didn't know that Bill appointed Lynch US Attorney.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Lynch claimed the two did not speak about the ongoing criminal investigation into Crooked Hillary’s gross negligent handling of top secret classified information. "Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren," the attorney general said.

When asked to comment about Monday's clandestine meeting, the former President fell back on his standard refrain: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lynch."
Click to expand...

Gee whiz!

So now your are bitching about two people discussing their grandchildren?

Of course,you are welcome to bitch about whatever you want to bitch about, however I do think that it would be better for you to find hobby that is a bit more productive and far less whiney.
 
Travis said:
Do you not converse with actual human people a lot?

For example when someone does something I dislike with great frequency and I blow up and say "you always do that!" am I actually literally saying that they have only ever done that to the exclusion of all other things? Or am I making a point of emphasis that it happens more than it should?
Click to expand...

Bwahahahahahaha. Travis, you've been here a long time, you really should know the answer to this already and you should know better. On the one hand, some of the views here are reasonably extreme, to the point that picking apart a response with "always" is actually necessary. On the other hand, scoring points by picking apart a response, even if the meaning was reasonably clear to the average observer, is so much easier. There's a Pith and Language award to be won, and no such thing as friendly discussion. In the game of the Interwebz, you win or you type in all caps!
 
Slings and Arrows said:
The meeting could be considered highly suspicious, and raises many ethical questions as to whether or not a federal prosecutor should be meeting with the family member of someone who is under criminal investigation.
Click to expand...

Who is currently "under criminal investigation" that is a family member of Bill Clinton? Oh, right. No one. I forgot. That's just spin so that we can make hay out of these kinds of articles, connect the dots and come up with the picture of a conspiracy so that later, we can all point and yell, "SEE! I TOLD YOU SO!"

Also, I'd appreciate if you'd end all your posts with "WAKE UP SHEEPLE".
 
Darat said:
What was clandestine about the meeting?
Click to expand...

No one knows as it was a private 30 minute conversion.

The thing is, the rest of the country understands that even if they didn't discuss anything improper, which we have no way of confirming, it was still incredibly poor judgment.

Your options are basically that Bill and Loretta are idiots and are oblivious to this fact that everyone else understands.

Or they knew how stupid it was but did so anyway. What did they have to discuss that was so important?

Then again Bill also showed up at that voting location, which was stupid. Maybe they just know that whatever they do it doesn't matter.
 
Last edited:
The_Animus said:
No one knows as it was a private 30 minute conversion.
Click to expand...
Ah, so when you don't know, you assume "clandestine". Got it.

The_Animus said:
The thing is, the rest of the country understands that even if they didn't discuss anything improper, which we have no way of confirming, it was still incredibly poor judgment.
Click to expand...
Sorry, you speak for yourself, just you, no one else. Please don't pretend otherwise.
The_Animus said:
Your options are basically that Bill and Loretta idiots and are oblivious to this fact that everyone else understands.
Or they knew how stupid it was but did so anyway. What did they have to discuss that was so important?
Click to expand...
Multiple logical fallacies. Well done skeptic.

The_Animus said:
Then again Bill also showed up at that voting location, which was stupid. Maybe they just know that whatever they do it doesn't matter.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's it, that must be it.

Hang um, hang um high. Guilty, cause, well just cause I hate um.
 
RobRoy said:
Who is currently "under criminal investigation" that is a family member of Bill Clinton? Oh, right. No one. I forgot. That's just spin so that we can make hay out of these kinds of articles, connect the dots and come up with the picture of a conspiracy so that later, we can all point and yell, "SEE! I TOLD YOU SO!"

Also, I'd appreciate if you'd end all your posts with "WAKE UP SHEEPLE".
Click to expand...

You forgot that Hillary's use of the cowboy server is under investigation by the FBI?

How in the hell did you forget that???
 
The_Animus said:
Maybe they just know that whatever they do it doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

This, probably, because if you're on one side of the line, or near enough to it, it doesn't matter what your "enemies" do. You're going to make whatever hay you can while the sun is shining, even if everyone tells you it's the dead of winter and that's snow falling over a frozen field. Get out there with your pick and your shovel and dig, dig, dig until you find what you're looking for. If you don't find it, for the love of Thor, don't admit that you were wrong. Double-down, wait for the 24-hour news cycle to hand you something else and then get back to work!
 
16.5 said:
You forgot that Hillary's use of the cowboy server is under investigation by the FBI?

How in the hell did you forget that???
Click to expand...

Ahh, well then, you should have no problem providing a link to the story which states there is a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton, right? Do so please.
 
The_Animus said:
No one knows as it was a private 30 minute conversion.

The thing is, the rest of the country understands that even if they didn't discuss anything improper, which we have no way of confirming, it was still incredibly poor judgment.

Your options are basically that Bill and Loretta are idiots and are oblivious to this fact that everyone else understands.

Or they knew how stupid it was but did so anyway. What did they have to discuss that was so important?

Then again Bill also showed up at that voting location, which was stupid. Maybe they just know that whatever they do it doesn't matter.
Click to expand...
Er.... that's not answering the question. Is there indeed any evidence this was a clandestine meeting. Seems to me to be just a meeting. No one seems to have evidence that the meeting was being done in secret had been planed to be secret and so on.
 
RobRoy said:
Ahh, well then, you should have no problem providing a link to the story which states there is a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton, right? Do so please.
Click to expand...

right

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/fbi...n-clinton-server-during-e-mail-investigation/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-glee-Republicans-day-Obama-endorses-her.html

heck, how about a court order:

"The privacy interests at stake are high because the government's criminal investigation through which Mr. Pagliano received limited immunity is ongoing and confidential," U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in an order issued Tuesday.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-judge-investigation-224314#ixzz4D4xeCpGc
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom