The existence of God and the efficacy of prayer

Thanks for the info about speaking in tongues. It seems logical.
In what way is it logical?

I asked a moderate non-Church-going Christian what proof she had that God existed. She said that there was a white Christian who went into the black tribal areas to caste out demons and that he had a good success rate.
Oh, goody. Racism.

Also, I notice that you used the word "caste" instead of "cast". Racism freudian slip?

While an atheist could argue that the ritual was some kind of psychotherapy, the fact that the improvements are so remarkable and quick, makes one wonder.
Just like the miraculous "cures" of the televangelists, a well known fraud.

My late wife and met a man who was very pleasant and friendly, but we both felt he was hiding something unpleasant inside. She said she saw a black shape on his shoulder and said he was possessed by a demon. Sure enough. Weird frightening behavior. His family were scared of him. He got cured, and the family unit was happy.
That is just a silly claim.

I am on this site to learn. Why do you post here?
No you evidently are not.
 
You're doing pretty well Part Skeptic, given that you're heavily outnumbered as usual.......

It isn't about numbers, it is about facts, logic and evidence. We've got all that, and the theists only have belief. So we win.
 
Thanks for the info about speaking in tongues. It seems logical.

I asked a moderate non-Church-going Christian what proof she had that God existed. She said that there was a white Christian who went into the black tribal areas to caste out demons and that he had a good success rate.

While an atheist could argue that the ritual was some kind of psychotherapy, the fact that the improvements are so remarkable and quick, makes one wonder.

There is a relationship between much of what we call mental illness and the demonic. In general they can't actually harm us, but they can influence us and this is ultimately the cause of much mental illness, either directly, or indirectly, through the behaviour of those who are oppressed. Release from their influence can be instantaneous, but we can also be so used to our old way of life that change is frightening and we invite our oppressors back. This is a big reason for why churches exist, to provide a supportive environment for the 'born again'.

My late wife and met a man who was very pleasant and friendly, but we both felt he was hiding something unpleasant inside. She said she saw a black shape on his shoulder and said he was possessed by a demon. Sure enough. Weird frightening behavior. His family were scared of him. He got cured, and the family unit was happy.

I can't comment on that, but my own experience is that people who are demonically influenced will use fear to get what they want, through tactics such as abuse, bullying, lying or emotional manipulation. While it's working for them there is little point in changing them. They may not be ready, if at all, until it all comes crashing down on them or they are on their deathbed.

I am on this site to learn. Why do you post here?
To share. For me the existence of God is a matter of knowledge, not belief, and I want to support others who believe on forums like this one. It's very difficult to argue the case for God, because He cannot (currently at least) be detected by scientific means and scientific materialists demand scientific evidence. They are using that to push through a secular, atheistic, value-free, essentially mechanistic worldview, which is entirely mistaken and very dangerous for us at this point in time. Currently, God can only be experienced and this is the ultimate answer to skepticism. But the skeptic has to open the door to the possibility. Our thoughts create our immediate reality and if we are extremely skeptical we hermetically seal ourselves within an atheistic worldview and thereby push away spiritual experience.

It's interesting that we are discussing the demonic here, because this atheist agenda is supported by the demonic. It suits them. This will set off firecrackers, but many atheists are in fact demonically influenced. CS Lewis said that demons regard a materialist and a magician with equal delight and I agree. It's not practiced very much on this fine forum, but on others the principal tactic employed by the skeptics is posts laced with abusive comments, which, as I said, are tactics also employed by the demonically oppressed.
 
.......my own experience is that people who are demonically influenced will use fear to get what they want, through tactics such as abuse, bullying, lying or emotional manipulation.........

Well, that's handy isn't it. Anyone you don't like or disagree with you simply brand demonic, and there, that explains everything.

...... many atheists are in fact demonically influenced..........

Oooh, and there you go. Don't like atheists? Call them demonically influenced. Gee, that's so intellectually unassailable.

There are no such thing as demons, blue triangle.........unless of course you have actual testable evidence to the contrary.
 
Last edited:
Nice turn of phrase blue triangle.:)

Interesting that that you toyed with the idea of becoming Catholic, rather unusual for a protestant I should think.
I'm not sure about the statistics, but yes it is unusual, especially in the working-class protestant culture of central Scotland. I got to the point of contacting a priest in fact. But then I had a dream. In it I was on a bus, which was at a crossroads. Everyone was sitting forward except a little boy (me) who was facing backwards, kneeling in front of a cushion on which was a cross and supplicated in prayer to it. Then everyone shouted in unison "We're protestants!". I took the hint.

Now can you give us something solid about why you know this god of yours is real. I don't want to hear about visions and such, (I get enough of that from my born again nephew), I want something concrete - forensic would be good.
All the physical evidence I have is a piece of paper upon which two biblical verses appeared, addressed to me. But you'd argue I could have typed them. I know someone who said her polio-affected leg was healed by growing an inch in front of two Christian witnesses who were praying over her. She limped no longer. Again though, it wasn't done under scientific conditions. It's always that way, because only those who are ready to accept the possibility of miracles will experience one. Those whose worldview precludes that possibility experience a miracle-free life. Anything else would violate their free will.
 
We non-bleeverz are possessed by devils! Yay! And that ole dumm reason is actually the wrong way to think!

1inchChrist, is that you?
 
When Pup says that my experiences are ordinary, it is clear he has no idea how unusual some experiences were. Denial in another form

Or you're denying others' experience, so you can feel special.

Joseph Smith said God, Jesus and others came and talked to him directly, gave him golden plates with writing on them and miraculously helped him translate them. That's pretty over the top, but most religions have been founded or led by people with such experiences. On a more common level, thousands of people have had religious visions. Thousands reported miraculous healing. Thousands believe they have had prayers answered in amazing ways, from winning the lottery to getting a job to getting pregnant after being told they're infertile. Thousands have experienced interaction with dead loved ones, either visions, dreams, through psychics, etc. Thousands have experienced impossible coincidences, or recalled past lives, or had curses lifted, or predicted the future through dreams or trances or ...

And when I say thousands, millions is probably more accurate. We're hardwired for experiencing this kind of stuff and for believing it's as real as reality. It's a normal part of the human condition, and it's normal to think it's special when it happens.
 
Prayer does work, and very powerfully too at times... There's a lot of nonsense spoken about praying in tongues (babbling about babbling!), but it's actually one of the most powerful methods of prayer... distracting the conscious mind, which is usually the biggest barrier to the healing power of prayer... praying in tongues is a very effective answer.
So it DOES have a real effect that CAN be measured, even to the point that different kinds of prayer or praying under different circumstances can be determined to have different levels of "power". Surely you can share with us how these facts were determined.

People who attempt to test the efficacy of prayer are making the mistaken assumption that it is a physical phenomenon that can be controlled by us
If it isn't & can't, then everything you just said in the previous quote box was false.

So when Christians pray for a man who is dying and he dies anyway, skeptics are unimpressed. But it simply may have... Maybe... prayer may...
So it has no effect often enough for its effectiveness to be completely hidden and look exactly the same as not praying at all, and all you can come up with to try to disguise that is making up a series of hypothetical ways it might maybe have done something else instead of what it was supposed to do that's good enough anyway. The claim you started with wasn't a maybe-might. It was a DOES. Show us what it DOES... not just because it's what your claim really was, but also because people people can sit around fumbling for made-up excuses for the failures of their false claims as easily as you can for the failures of the ones you claim are true.

"Psychics" & "mediums" talk about being interfered with by negative vibes coming from someone nearby... astrologers complain about being set up with misinformation or claim there was some lost obscure detail about someone's "chart" that was somehow hidden or otherwise not accounted for on the first try... magicians claiming real telekinesis claim they're feeling a bit weak when a demonstration they didn't set up themselves is sprung on them... people claiming to be able to identify individuals or do medical diagnosis by aura repeatedly reduce & weaken their claims for testing purposes and then, when they fail anyway even on the reduced version, retroactively claim that their wrong answers were really right because they hadn't felt very sure about them... people claiming to be able to live without eating food insist that they really could have done it if they'd just been allowed to keep going when their attempted demonstrations are aborted because they showed clear signs of malnourishment... snake handlers who get bitten and are saved by medical intervention swear they know someone else for whom it had worked when no medical people were around... chi masters who can't push down their opponents in real matches claim their opponents were using chi too or there was some other kind of chi-interference at the exact time & place of the match or they're suddenly feeling ill but they're sure they could do it some other time...

Backing off from claims of what would happen to excuses about what might happen some other time when nobody's looking is precisely the routine behavior of people with false claims. That's who you're making yourself look like. To differentiate yourself from them, all you need to do is show your claims about the real world actually being accurate in the real world, not more and more and more and more excuses for why it isn't.

I was in a hurry, and conflated flat denial and experience.
Well, the former isn't much on its own anyway. Of course people will deny stuff they don't see any reason to think it's real. That's because... they don't see any reason to think it's real.

Fourth - Flat denial that Intelligent design MIGHT be valid.
Of course, because it has overwhelmingly been proven over and over and over and over and over to be nothing but a pile of flat-out lies.

At this point, there's really not even any need to move on and deal with the rest individually because... come on, seriously... Creationism. That's not just false, but a towering beacon of flamboyant dishonesty shininig on the hill for all to see, declaring the wonders of illogic to be found inside where the world's greatest collection of lies has been brought together and put on display for your amazement. Gaze in shock as you pass from one chamber to another to another to another to another in its mighty Hall Of Fallacies! Get lost among the self-contradictions in its dizzying Maze Of Mirrors! Get a tiny bottle of Even Holier Water in the gift shop on your way out for just $14.99!

Anything else you associate with that is even more discredited just because you've now exposed yourself as a Creationist making a list of things associated with Creationism. Any film of credibility you might have been able to put up over some of these other claims is now dissolved away by the Creationism. It's like defending yourself against charges of petty theft & vandalism by giving an alibi that you were elsewhere killing someone at the time.

Creationism to back up "the existence of God and the efficacy of prayer". Holy wow. We need a smiley that's looking down, slowly shaking its head.
 
. Those whose worldview precludes that possibility experience a miracle-free life. Anything else would violate their free will.
How does that make any sense?

To be more precise, how does it violate the free will of one without violating the free will of the other?

Because it seems you're angling free will as uncertainty.
 
How does that make any sense?

To be more precise, how does it violate the free will of one without violating the free will of the other?

Because it seems you're angling free will as uncertainty.

Let me put it another way. It would violate their beliefs about reality - and we're free to hold any beliefs about reality, which is where our free will comes in. That's also why I advocate keeping the door to spiritual beliefs open a little, even if you're a firmly-convinced materialist. You may just be wrong. And in terms of numbers, you are very much in a minority - which proves nothing, of course, but suggests that your own particular valley of thought may not be the only one in the land.
 
It would violate their beliefs about reality - and we're free to hold any beliefs about reality, which is where our free will comes in.

Confirming your beliefs is precisely as much a violation of free will as disproof. One can't pick and choose. Free will is as much, if not more so, about the capacity to change one's mind as to guess it right the first time.
 
Last edited:
Well, that's handy isn't it. Anyone you don't like or disagree with you simply brand demonic, and there, that explains everything.
Believe me, I'm saying it without rancour. I wish to help those who are so afflicted, because it is the worst of afflictions.

Oooh, and there you go. Don't like atheists? Call them demonically influenced. Gee, that's so intellectually unassailable.

I generally see atheists as more spiritually advanced than many Christians. It's a well-known stage in the spiritual journey. And one of the most demonically-influenced people I know is a Christian.

There are no such thing as demons, blue triangle.........unless of course you have actual testable evidence to the contrary.

I don't need to have testable evidence to convince me they are real. That won't convince you either, in all likelihood. Only experience would do that. It's the same with any spiritual phenomenon in fact. One thing I would advise though is never to watch any horror film. They create the fear that can attract the demonic.
 
Let me put it another way. It would violate their beliefs about reality - and we're free to hold any beliefs about reality, which is where our free will comes in. That's also why I advocate keeping the door to spiritual beliefs open a little, even if you're a firmly-convinced materialist. You may just be wrong. And in terms of numbers, you are very much in a minority - which proves nothing, of course, but suggests that your own particular valley of thought may not be the only one in the land.

In terms of numbers over here in Europe, the non-religious is the majority...

Oh - and what does a demon look like? If I should bump into one...
 
My trouble with belief in demons is that if somebody has a problem and blames it on demons instead of mental illness or whatever the real issue is, it cannot get solved.
 
In terms of numbers over here in Europe, the non-religious is the majority...

Non-believers or non-practising believers? Do you have a survey you can point to?

Oh - and what does a demon look like? If I should bump into one...

My late wife said it looked like a black or dark shapeless mass.

And you would not know if you bumped into one. Their purpose is to cause one to take a rash decision, or mess with their thoughts.

Example One - an impulse to pick up a knife and kill oneself. And then one says "Where did that thought or impulse come from?"

Example Two - When I clashed physically and verbally with the man with a demon, he was raving and cursing at me. I had a short stabbing spear in my hand at the time. The impulse to just run him though jumped into my head. And he shouted "Kill me. Kill me." The demon would have had two victims. Him dead and me charged with murder.

I had a further confrontation and interaction with the man. It seemed that from this he got the strength to drive out the demon. He thanked me afterward for the huge change in his life. And so did his wife.

Just an ordinary day in the "Place of Spirit" at the mountain retreat. ;)
 
Or you're denying others' experience, so you can feel special.

I deny that.

Joseph Smith said God, Jesus and others came and talked to him directly, gave him golden plates with writing on them and miraculously helped him translate them. That's pretty over the top, but most religions have been founded or led by people with such experiences. On a more common level, thousands of people have had religious visions. Thousands reported miraculous healing. Thousands believe they have had prayers answered in amazing ways, from winning the lottery to getting a job to getting pregnant after being told they're infertile. Thousands have experienced interaction with dead loved ones, either visions, dreams, through psychics, etc. Thousands have experienced impossible coincidences, or recalled past lives, or had curses lifted, or predicted the future through dreams or trances or ...

And when I say thousands, millions is probably more accurate. We're hardwired for experiencing this kind of stuff and for believing it's as real as reality. It's a normal part of the human condition, and it's normal to think it's special when it happens.


So you are arguing my point that people have DO HAVE spiritual experiences. But you have one explanation and I think I may have an alternative explanation.
 
My late wife said it looked like a black or dark shapeless mass.

Too much television.

And you would not know if you bumped into one. Their purpose is to cause one to take a rash decision, or mess with their thoughts.

And we can solve this drought by sacrificing cattle to the rain gods. (This was mooted in Parliament. It's an actual ANC measure. I think you should join them; you'll click.)

Example One - an impulse to pick up a knife and kill oneself. And then one says "Where did that thought or impulse come from?"

The mind; you know, that thing wasting so much space in the skull.

Example Two - When I clashed physically and verbally with the man with a demon..

Chuck Norris? Is that you?
 
So you are arguing my point that people have DO HAVE spiritual experiences. But you have one explanation and I think I may have an alternative explanation.

Following your alternate route leads into fields of fantasy where every surprise can be numbed by more invention.
 

Back
Top Bottom