I found the missing Jolt.

FalseFlag said:
Not a peep? Is that an industry term?

The reality is that lots of peeps heard lots of "peeps" as the buildings were demolished. You just ignore this.
Click to expand...

Please provide a link to how many of these people were qualified to distinguish noise produced by explosives from other loud noises produced on 9/11.
 
ProBonoShill said:
SOP for who?
Click to expand...

These people...http://www.nfpa.org/

Here's what they have to say about testing for explosives.

N.F.P.A. 921 (2001 Edition) 19.4.8.2.6 – Extremism …. It reads:

“Extremism-motivated fire setting is committed to further a social, political, or religious cause. Fires have been used as a weapon of social protest since revolutions first began. Extremist fire setters may work in groups or as individuals.Also, due to planning aspects and the selection of their targets, extremist fire setters generally have a great degree of organization, as reflected in their use of more elaborate ignition or incendiary devices. Subcategories of extremist fire setting are identified as follows (a) Terrorism. The targets set by terrorists may appear to be at random; however, target locations are generally selected with some degree of political or economic significance. Political targets generally include government offices, newspapers, universities, political party headquarters, and military or law enforcement installations. Political terrorists may also target diverse properties such as animal research facilities or abortion clinics. Economic targets may include business offices,
distribution facilities of utility providers, banks, or companies thought to have an adverse impact on the environments. Fires or explosions become a means of creation confusion fear, or anarchy. THE TERRORIST MAY INCLUDE FIRE AS A VARIETY OF WEAPONS, ALONG WITH EXPLOSIVES, USED IN FURTHERING HIS OR HER GOAL”

N.F.P.A. 921 19.4.8.2.6 – Extremism
During an investigation, many things must be considered. Aside from the physical evidence, and witness testimony, suspect criminal history also must be analyzed. The investigation must include past history and the Modus Operandi,“M.O.” for short.

“”N.F.P.A. 921- 19.2.4 Exotic Accelerants states that molten steel and concrete could indicate the use of exotic accelerants, specifically Thermite.”
Click to expand...


A 10 second google search. You're welcome.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=police+dogs+present+at+911&ie=&oe=
Click to expand...
Are all police dogs bomb-sniffing dogs? How many bomb-sniffing dogs were at GZ immediately after 9/11?
 
AJM8125 said:
Please provide a link to how many of these people were qualified to distinguish noise produced by explosives from other loud noises produced on 9/11.
Click to expand...
Please explain why this is relevant.

Many people heard explosions. A legitimate investigation would not have ignored their testimony.
 
ff is a waste of time... ignore him. He adds nothing to anyone's understanding of building collapses.
 
FalseFlag said:
You should re-evaluate your understanding of "zero" and "overwhelming".

Let me use those words in a sentence you might understand.

Your overwhelming number of posts with zero facts is quite amusing.
Click to expand...

To you, but not to Mr. Realty, demolition experts, architects, structural engineers and yes, even firefighters, who are on the record for stating that no CD was responsible.
 
FalseFlag said:
Many people heard explosions. A legitimate investigation would not have ignored their testimony.
Click to expand...


No one heard explosions that were attributed to explosives. Even some firefighters have stated the explosions they heard were from exploding gas lines. That, during a NBC news report, which was replayed on TV a few years ago. Other firefighters attributed the sound they heard to collapsing floors, not explosives.

Craig Carlsen said that he and other firefighters “heard explosions coming from the south tower

...there were about ten explosions...At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.

As you can see, the explosions they heard had nothing to do with explosives.
 
Last edited:
skyeagle409 said:
For those of us who have heard such explosions on many occasions....
Click to expand...

I've advocated for some years that "we" should arrange a visit to a demolition training range.

...all those people who have NEVER heard HE - or even a length of det cord.

....or ANFO for comparison purposes. :rolleyes:




(Yeah - I realise it wouldn't achieve much --- truther goalposts are relocatable.........)
 
FalseFlag said:
You should re-evaluate your understanding of "zero" and "overwhelming".

Let me use those words in a sentence you might understand.

Your overwhelming number of posts with zero facts is quite amusing.

Definitely part of the 50.
Click to expand...

It is YOU, who is amusing considering that CD was dismissed years ago by architects, structural engineers, firefighters, and even demolition experts, and look what you've posted.

Keep that up and I might think that you are impersonating a Truther and just posting disinformation in order to make them look worst than they already are.

Disinformation Killed 9/11 “Truth”

By 2009, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement was so inundated with disinformation that it had become a laughingstock. The easily-discredited claims (lies) contaminated the greater issue and soiled dissenters across the board. “Turd blossom” was a Karl Rove phrase that could describe what the movement had devolved into. The media, whether corporate or foundation-funded, could find people ranting about “the Jews” or the Illuminati, the Lizard People, the missiles, holograms, mini-nukes or space beam weapons vaporizing the Twin Towers.

Many trolls, and some public personalities, appeared to be professional disinformation artists hard at work concocting and posting this crap online, which others repeated to their own detriment. One cannot easily prove that a specific person is a paid shill, a disinformation agent, a cyber agent provocateur, but be assured they are out there, and “out there.”

http://www.911truth.org/disinformation-killed-911-truth/


I also noticed that you avoided providing the explosion time lines that I requested from you. Can I take that as a clue that you are just here trolling for fun?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
Please explain why this is relevant.

Many people heard explosions. A legitimate investigation would not have ignored their testimony.
Click to expand...

In fact, and you know this to be true, NIST did investigate the sounds on recordings and determined that there were none that are consistent with detonation of explosived.
There ya go, no new investigation requured.
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
These people...http://www.nfpa.org/

Here's what they have to say about testing for explosives.
Click to expand...

That's nice.

Except everyone with a functioning brain knows how the fires started that day, two huge jumbo jets full of fuel slammed into buildings at 500mph. No need to test for explosives.

Are all police dogs bomb-sniffing dogs? How many bomb-sniffing dogs were at GZ immediately after 9/11
Click to expand...

Stop being so lazy, the answers are there in the link I provided.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom