Archie Gemmill Goal
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 8,324
I don't think they're said it directly as a policy statement, but certainly individuals have said things along the lines of, "That's money we could be spending on the NHS" without any further qualification. Certainly it's rare to hear them saying, "we could be spending it on X, Y, or Z."
The biggest problem, though, if that while it sounds like a lot of money to many people, it's absolutely dwarfed by actual government spending, even in specific areas like the NHS. Brexiters have pushed the line that certain services are suffering because we send a certain amount of money to the EU (ignoring the reverse benefits), and they get away with it because most people don't know what's already spend on those same services.
It's also clever use of the word 'could' when the word they really are looking for is 'wouldn't.
Not one of the people championing Brexit is proposing actually increasing NHS funding as far as I can see. More likely would be frittered away in tax cuts for the rich.