Motive? LOL, I don't want you to provide motive, I want evidence Mr Bond
The aircraft impacts were used as causal ruses to blame outsiders.
And how did they do that? Now you added thousands of people in the fantasy plot of CD.
The act of planting charges would at the very least necessitate insider complicity of some sort.
Add more people to the plot, why stop with the reality of 19 and only four had to know the suicide plot, now we have hundreds to fake the airplane plot, hundred to plant explosives, silent explosives, and some which suck in the side of the WTC towers.
Blaming it on the airplanes headed off any investigation into who planted charges to satisfy the public.
Blaming it on the airplanes going 470 - 590 mph which damaged 6 to 10 core columns is to satisfy the public. Cold blooded murder of crew and passengers is to cover up the CD? Who is low down enough to do this, let alone make up the fantasy version of it? It appears the only people on earth who make up the CD lies are the kind of people who might do it; 911 truth followers imagine it was CD, must mean they would be ready to do it...
Any good prosecutor will tell you that knowing someone's motive is not necessary to prove they committed a certain act.
LOL, YES, this is true; What are you missing? Evidence.
You seem to be using your lack of knowing what the motives were to try and convince yourself that the evidence for controlled demolition can't be, even though it is very significant.
Motive, UBL said he would kill Americans, the 19 did it. I know the motive, suspected it at the second impact, the impact of Flight 175 which you say was a ruse... lol, can you prove it, got Evidence? No, you have a growing fantasy of woo based on BS.
How could Al-Qaeda wire WTC 7 or the Twin Towers for that matter?
Gee, how could anyone wire 7 WTC? Only Al-Qaeda can keep a secret, can your evil MIB NWO people you can't name not only murder four aircraft with crew and passengers, fake the 19 identities, and wire 1, 2, 7 WTC? Blow up the Pentagon, and have absolute proof, aka now fake proof for your delusional fantasy, the Passengers saved the next target by attacking the cockpit, and your fake terrorists panicked and decided to die there, in PA? Gee, I can't wait for the SIOP of your fantasy.
Those who did it used the airplanes to blame Al-Qaeda for the twin towers and the public bought it.
Tony, that is reality, 19 murderers did fly the planes and murder. That is what the evidence says. "Any good prosecutor will tell you that" you need evidence, and simile is not evidence of CD, it is evidence someone does not understand simile. Too bad you have no evidence for CD, a wire, some left over charges, some blast effects on steel, the sounds of explosives... etc.
With WTC 7 they only have fires and taking that shortcut has been causing them problems in trying to deflect from the insider angle.
Fire is all you need to damage steel. But deny it, you have to deny it to have the never ending BS story you outline in these few posts.
Larry Silverstein has even taken to saying the 360 foot tall North Tower antenna hit WTC 7, even though all videos of its fall clearly show it falling to the southeast, in the opposite direction of WTC 7.
Wow, a Gish Gallop to Larry, got to add Larry S. if you are going to head off in to tangential symetrical free-fall land of woo, the fantasy of CD. A token Larry statement, has to be added to complete the fantasy.
I don't think any of the telltale signs of coherent discussion are observed in what you and many others write on this forum trying to deny the three obvious high-rise controlled demolitions that occurred in NYC on Sept. 11, 2001.
Really, you have turned what really happen, four planes used as weapons to kill Americans for UBL, and say it was a ruse. Coherent? There is no way you can explain your version without going full blown fantasy on us.
You offer zero evidence for CD, and claim it was CD.
We are living in a La La Land with this farce and people like you are unwittingly trying to keep it from being fully exposed for what it was. Your comments on the collapses are nothing short of ridiculous.
You are living in La La Fantasy CD Land, where simile, saying it sounded like, is all the evidence you will ever have for CD. And simile is not evidence for CD, it is evidence some use BS to make up the inside job of CD. A fantasy of CD based on zero evidence.
The dynamics of the collapses, such as, the symmetric (all four corners of the roof) free fall of WTC 7...
The collapse was not symmetrical, stop saying this; it ruins your evidence free CD claims and exposes you don't understand symmetry. But on the other hand, be sure you only show the collapse from far away so the non-symmetry will be less observable.
continuous acceleration of the North Tower,
Gee, the towers fell as if they were destroying each floor, and you forgot, the core did not have a continuous acceleration, thus you are spreading a lie. The core stood for nearly 20 seconds, thus the continuous acceleration is BS, to distract faith based followers who don't look, don't research, don't think. You can fool a lot of gullible followers with nonsense like this.
are in fact different than what would have to be observed in a natural collapse. These types of motions in a collapse can only be induced by artificially removal of structural integrity.
Wrong again. CD is a gravity collapse started with explosives or some means; on 9/11 the collapses were started by the effects of fire. Avoid this staement for your future discussion, it makes your claim look silly, as if you had no clue E=mgh released in CD is more than an order of magnitude more energy than the tiny explosives used.
WTC towers released more energy than 100 2,000 pound bombs have, twice, once in each tower... thus you don't need explosives, as seen on 9/11.
The fact that you ignore, or don't understand this, is why I say your comments are ridiculous.
I understand clearly this is BS, and is exactly what happens in a "natural" collapse, called a gravity collapse. CD uses gravity to destroy the buildings, the same as a fire started collapse on 9/11. CD uses tiny amounts of explosives, gravity does the work. Thus the concrete, wallboard, and office contents were not blown up, they were crushed by E=mgh being released by fire damage, fire effects. These are the facts and the fantasy version of planes being a ruse, is a failed fantasy. Who planted your explosives which have no blast effects, no sounds, and act as if they were not there? lol
If this thread is only about collapse dynamics, ridiculous hush-a-boom stuff should be ignored. It could be verinage hydraulic devices for the sake of argument.
Wow, now someone set up Hydraulic Devices to do 9/11. That is more sane than the Nukes, DEW, and CD, but ... oops, not it is an extra stupid claim. Good job taking the collapse dynamics to a whole new fantasy level of woo.
You are saying instead of explosives which make no sounds of explosives, the collapses were started by NWO hydraulic devices. wow - you can't explain why there are no sounds of explosives? Why can't you supply evidence of CD?
Relax, you have no evidence; it is easy to keep the fantasy of CD, you don't have to do anything but ignore reality. CD, 14 years of lies and failed physics; No Evidence for 14 years. A record being set everyday forever.
The people here who want to deny controlled demolition is what explains the collapses can't argue the dynamics, so they invariably move to other things.
You are right that Verinage type techniques could have been used. We don't know for sure and that is why I usually say "some form of demolition devices were used". The dynamics do show structural integrity was being artificially removed. There is no getting around that.
Wow... more fantasy
