The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

[dasmiller]

I am not sure state employees can measure (or even write) anything without sloppiness.. I think nobody in Denmark would disagree that state employees are the cause of losing minimum 15% of tax payers money due to stupidity every year.. For example buying IC4 train that is only scrap (honestly), Helicopters and drones that can't fly, software that not works, - and I could continue the rest of the day...

What may you believe that state employees can measure a road correct, or be of any use in science at all ?


[qimg]http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g194/WitchyWebcomics/My%20Motivationals/Sotp2.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.funnysigns.net/files/turn-lelt-400x227.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.funroads.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/300x225xShcool1-300x225.jpg.pagespeed.ic.6bb-Tz9AIg.jpg[/qimg]

If you want to convince us that you have an improvement over Relativity for basic orbital calculations, your time is probably better spent learning how to do basic orbital calculations than posting pictures of street markings.

Also, you might want to think carefully before you cite typos as a defining characteristic of ineptness.

 

[Reality Check]

I am too lazy today, and by the way how strong elliptic during the test

You have been too lazy for years, Bjarne, not just today, because you have been touting fantasy for years without trying to learn science ! That is not only orbital mechanics. It is the level of science that high school students learn.

In this forum, you stated with Is Bended Space = Contracted Space ? (13th October 2009 ) (GR is not high school science, not that you wrote anything about GR).

The RR fantasy appeared in Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion. (7th March 2010) which lead to my post: Why RR is a fantasy and Bjarne debunks RR again and again and the question that you never answered and implies science that you have not learned in over 6 years: Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)?
You cannot write a physics equation that is in just meters because other scales and units (e.g. feet) exist! The "1 metre" in your arbitrary RR equation still makes it invalid.

Noticed the RR page on your web site which is nonsense about the Lorentz factor being an "expression of the tension increase of space".

However you forget that you have claimed to have done calculations for space probes with your RR that has a "North/South" thing about it (according to this thread) and so should be able to do them for satellites:
1 June 2016 Bjarne: Please cite your calculation of the direction and magnitude of the acceleration of space probes leaving the solar system, e.g. Voyager 1 and 2.
1 June 2016 Bjarne: Please cite your calculation of the direction and magnitude of the acceleration of space probes in a n Earth flyby.

 

[Reality Check]

I am not sure state employees can measure (or even write) anything without sloppiness...

An irrelevant fantasy about state employees and images is not a honest reply to a post about science.

Ranting about "massive brainwash and propaganda" instead of presenting evidence suggests that you have "massive brainwashed" yourself about SR, GR and even science, Bjarne !

In the real world when we do the same experiment over and over again, we get the same results. If we do a more accurate version of the experiment then we get more accurate results. The Galileo and ACES experiments are more accurate versions of experiments that have already shown SR and GR to be correct.

For example, a scientist measures the length of a rod again and again. I expect the scientist to get the same result again and again. Even if he uses a more accurate ruler.
What happens in your world, Bjarne ?

Maybe Bjarne does not like the word "scientist "! So how about:
For example, a high school science student measures the length of a rod again and again. I expect the high school science student to get the same result again and again. Even if the high school science student uses a more accurate ruler.
What happens in your world, Bjarne ?

 

[Bjarne]

You have been too lazy for years, Bjarne, not just today, because you have been touting fantasy for years without trying to learn science ! That is not only orbital mechanics. It is the level of science that high school students learn.

In this forum, you stated with Is Bended Space = Contracted Space ? (13th October 2009 ) (GR is not high school science, not that you wrote anything about GR).

The RR fantasy appeared in Bjarne on: Dark Energy, only an illusion. (7th March 2010) which lead to my post: Why RR is a fantasy and Bjarne debunks RR again and again and the question that you never answered and implies science that you have not learned in over 6 years: Does Bjarne know basic physics (unit-less quantities cannot be arbitrarily assigned units)?
You cannot write a physics equation that is in just meters because other scales and units (e.g. feet) exist! The "1 metre" in your arbitrary RR equation still makes it invalid.

Noticed the RR page on your web site which is nonsense about the Lorentz factor being an "expression of the tension increase of space".

However you forget that you have claimed to have done calculations for space probes with your RR that has a "North/South" thing about it (according to this thread) and so should be able to do them for satellites:
1 June 2016 Bjarne: Please cite your calculation of the direction and magnitude of the acceleration of space probes leaving the solar system, e.g. Voyager 1 and 2.
1 June 2016 Bjarne: Please cite your calculation of the direction and magnitude of the acceleration of space probes in a n Earth flyby.

I need to know

1. Are Galileo 5 and 6 dedicated for testning GR or are all media really lying as you claimed.
2. Galileo 5 and 6 inclination, - after you spend 17 years at a university why do you now provide it. It will properly only take you few minuts
3. And same Q to how much elliptic

 

[Bjarne]

An irrelevant fantasy about state employees and images is not a honest reply to a post about science.

Maybe Bjarne does not like the word "scientist "! So how about:
For example, a high school science student measures the length of a rod again and again. I expect the high school science student to get the same result again and again. Even if the high school science student uses a more accurate ruler.
What happens in your world, Bjarne ?

Why should the measure a rod.
You mean the student measure how to build this road.

 

[Reality Check]

I am not dumb enough to waste my time doing your work

I need to know ...

How not to exaggerate so much it is almost a lie, Bjarne. I did not say that "media really lying". I said that you parroted what looked like a lie from your "friend".
How to read English, Bjarne. One last time:
3 June 2016 Bjarne: I am not dumb enough to waste my time doing your work which you cannot so because of "laziness" (as you have said several times) or ignorance or incompetence or some other reason.

 

[Reality Check]

Why should the measure a rod.

What an ignorant question, Bjarne - to get the length of the rod !

 

[Reality Check]

Bjarne: Ranting about "massive brainwash and propaganda" is not evidence

You missed: 2 June 2016 Bjarne: Ranting about "massive brainwash and propaganda" in a post as below is not evidence against anything

 

[Lukraak_Sisser]

So, you see a road that has clearly been intentionally designed that way to make people slalom and thus slow down / avoid badly seen exits from houses, as an error and then somehow make the leap that because you do not understand how road building works, therefore quantum mechanics / GR is wrong.

It does say a lot about your theory, but in my opinion it also shows a complete lack of understanding how logic works.

 

[Reality Check]

Bjarne: Repeating the same experiments gets same or better results

2 June 2016 Bjarne: Ignorance about when scientists repeat the same experiment, they get the same or better results!

 

[Reality Check]

I meant this as a joke because I could not conceive that anyone could be ignorant about the experiment of the simple act of measuring the length of a rod:

For example, a high school science student measures the length of a rod again and again. I expect the high school science student to get the same result again and again. Even if the high school science student uses a more accurate ruler.
What happens in your world, Bjarne ?

But then we have Bjarne's reply !

 

[Bjarne]

So, you see a road that has clearly been intentionally designed that way to make people slalom and thus slow down / avoid badly seen exits from houses, as an error and then somehow make the leap that because you do not understand how road building works, therefore quantum mechanics / GR is wrong.

It does say a lot about your theory, but in my opinion it also shows a complete lack of understanding how logic works.

I have seen such nicer and more intelligent before

 

[fuelair]

What an ignorant question, Bjarne - to get the length of the rod !

so he can tell if it will fully fit in wherever he plans to place it for his measurement(s) !!!!!!!

 

[fuelair]

I have seen such nicer and more intelligent before

English is not your first language is it?! That could easily explain a small part of the problem!!!!!!!

 

[Daylightstar]

I need to know

1. Are Galileo 5 and 6 dedicated for testning GR or are all media really lying as you claimed.
2. Galileo 5 and 6 inclination, - after you spend 17 years at a university why do you now provide it. It will properly only take you few minuts
3. And same Q to how much elliptic

You do not really need to know these things, you could do nothing useful with this information.
Look at the orbit information which someone did look up and post for you, you have no idea what to do with it.

Perhaps you have some flowers which needs watering, go do that.

 

[Bjarne]

Look at the orbit information which someone did look up and post for you, you have no idea what to do with it.
.

And you not either
Bet `?

 

[Daylightstar]

And you not either
Bet `?

You already have the data handed to you, you couldn't even find that yourself.
Don't worry about it Bjarne, you have no use for that data.

Water those flowers.
Quickly check if your shoe laces are tied, you could fix them up .... I would expect.

 

[The Man]

No, release happens when the strong force (the interaction) stop working ex after BB.

Why you claim it is released is irrelevant, that you claim it is immediately released means it has no sustained affect for any period of time

Only if the “push” / “pull” would happen at the same time, if it did it would require too much energy, so it will not.
First pull then push etc……..in a endless cícle, as I said because such save energy.

Immediately was your own assertion. I understand that English isn't your first language so I have no problem cutting you some slack for perhaps mis-speaking. However, trying to change your tune after the fact is unlikely to help you.

OK so now "the “push” / “pull” " don't happen at the same time. How much time is there between them? If you don't know then you don't know that they aren't simultaneous.

"require too much energy" you say? Exactly how much energy does it "require". How much is "too much"? If you don't know then you don't know how much energy that is required or would be too much

Particle almost live their own life, matter is not a question only about absorbed space, but also energy, no one have expressed that more clear headed as both Einstein and Max Plank.

I far as I recall "both Einstein and Max Plank" never mentioned anything about "absorbed space". Don't try to blame others for the lack of consistency in your own notions

Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter. … Albert Einstein

We who? We, meaning scientist and engineers who produce things (like myself) certainly haven't "been all wrong" or all the stuff you use wouldn't work.

“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together.
We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”
Max Planck

As expected no mention of "absorbed space" and anyone with any experience in atomic physics or even chemistry would immediately recognize what he is talking about are the bound states sub-atomic particles.

“Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
… Albert Einstein

Again as expected no mention of "absorbed space". As I mentioned before that is the empowerment and problem with fantasy, the lack of limitations. Out of context quotes won't help you.

Right, but the Q was, where is the best (hard) evidence for that prediction ?

No, the question was "what" not "where". Quite frankly I don't know what criteria you would be applying to determine better or "best" to determine the "best (hard) evidence for that prediction" and even if I did I'm not inclined in the slightest to do your research for you. Stop being lazy and do your own research.

 

[Bjarne]

Why you claim it is released is irrelevant,

Nothing is irrelevant if you want to understand the nature of space, - also not the nature of release of space tension , a gravitational wave, or shortly spoken so called dark energy.

, that you claim it is immediately released means it has no sustained affect for any period of time

When the interaction has started, 2 particles are united and acts as one.
The interaction is ; unification of process and energy. Possible if the frequencies of 2 particles are as I just described above. It is the continuously spin that prevent disintegration..

Probability Density for one nucleon having spin up and the other spin down:

OK so now "the “push” / “pull” " don't happen at the same time. How much time is there between them? If you don't know then you don't know that they aren't simultaneous.

Time in QM is a strange factor and make often no sense

"require too much energy" you say? Exactly how much energy does it "require". How much is "too much"?
If you don't know then you don't know how much energy that is required or would be too much

It’s all about "space tension”
Different circumstance = different relativistic mass, as we discussed above.
Energy will always seeks for lowest possible levels; this is why a stone fall to the earth and why the pioneer 10 and 11 was decelerating. Everything around you is about “space tension”

I far as I recall "both Einstein and Max Plank" never mentioned anything about "absorbed space". Don't try to blame others for the lack of consistency in your own notions

The curvature of space is in reality stretching space, caused by space absorbing particles. I am not blaming anyone for anything, just showing you that the thought, - that matter is not matter, - rather space (noting) + energy, - is not new. .

We who?

Theis was a Einstein quote

Again as expected no mention of "absorbed space". As I mentioned before that is the empowerment and problem with fantasy, the lack of limitations. Out of context quotes won't help you.

“Imagination is more important than knowledge.
For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
Albert Einstein

No, the question was "what" not "where". Quite frankly I don't know what criteria you would be applying to determine better or "best" to determine the "best (hard) evidence for that prediction" and even if I did I'm not inclined in the slightest to do your research for you. Stop being lazy and do your own research.

I am not aware any good evidence proving that light bends.
But I am also not denying it.
If you want to share your own conviction, - is up to you.

 

[Pixel42]

I am not aware any good evidence proving that light bends.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Eddington#Relativity

Needless to say there have been many more such observations since.

Try googling 'gravitational lensing'.