Brexit: the referendum

It seems that the argument seems to be coming down to immigration. It seems that it's more important to be able to exclude immigrants than it is to have a vibrant economy for them (and us) to work in :mad:
The Brexit campaign is all about xenophobia and only about xenophobia. Xenophobes and their extremist cousins - racists - are always intent on pursuing their prejudices to the exclusion of all economic considerations. Xenophobia is a mania; it is not the result of rational calculation.
 
Sorry about the order of quotes, I am on a phone.

This is a finw example of what Craig was discussing:


You may be right about that. I have never really understood the common agricultural policy, or the European Commission, or the culling of the Scottish fishing fleets so that Spanish factory ships could grab our cod or mackerel, or the way that our our budget policy, and decisions about our health service, are decided by the German finance minister, or the way rulings by our Supreme Court can be overturned in Europe.

The economic danger of all this is that a currency speculator like George Soros in America, who supports the fascist beasts in Ukraine, and Sultan Erdogan in Turkey, and our Jewish lordships, can cause a sudden loss of international confidence, which would result in a sale en masse of foreign held sterling.

Note the antisemitic reference to Jewish lordships.

The Brexit campaign is all about xenophobia and only about xenophobia. Xenophobes and their extremist cousins - racists - are always intent on pursuing their prejudices to the exclusion of all economic considerations. Xenophobia is a mania; it is not the result of rational calculation.

Yes, reason isn't going to do much if someone expresses views like the quote above yours.
 
The point is it turns out that judges can no longer give a sentence of more than five years for causing death or injury by dangerous driving. I was wondering to myself if this was just another daft ruling by the European Court of Justice.
Not true. As was pointed out on one of the recent US shooting threads, death by dangerous driving here gets up to 14 years.
 
This is one of my reasons for voting to stay in, another is that I have yet to hear a single fact based argument for leaving - all I have heard so far is speculation.

Speculation and "principles." I don't much mind those who doggedly cling to the latter, but those who various "look art what we can spend the money on when we're out" fantasies are getting right on my tits.
 
The Brexit campaign is all about xenophobia and only about xenophobia. Xenophobes and their extremist cousins - racists - are always intent on pursuing their prejudices to the exclusion of all economic considerations. Xenophobia is a mania; it is not the result of rational calculation.

Much like that post :D

A concern about the social impact of mass migration is NOT Xenophobia, and it IS rational.

However, I'd also argue that it is NOT (or at least shouldn't be) the only concern about the European Union, and the advisability of leaving it.
 
MSM and its captains cannot believe that we are judged to be around 52-- 48 in the lead with the trend and momentum clearly in our favour .
In fact ,
Brexit -- you know it makes sense
 
I still wonder what magical economic strength is going to make britain (or more likely england alone) be on par with the EU once they leave.
Maybe, just maybe, if trump becomes president in the US he will keep his promise and keep trade agreements at the same level, but he IS a capitalist and since a small nation has less trade muscles to flex than a large coordinated market I doubt it.
As for the rest, the UK, let alone england has no resources to speak of, the economic services it offers can easily be done elsewhere and is not needed for international trade routs, nor does it still have a major manufactoring base, yet it is very dependent on the EU for its export and imports, which will not change.

At the same time the UK now has a LOT of little perks in the EU negotiated by Tatcher that give it a lot of influence and profit that will vanish and they will lose all influence on EU decisions, which will still affect them.

I see the same thing in the dutch exit supporters here who seem to ignore that if the Netherlands leaves the EU germany and france can still dictate us economically but without the disproportional influence we have now.

Of course, maybe international politics will suddenly change and become based upon goodwill and friendship rather than the current way of working and the brexit will make china and the rest of the world admire the plucky little nation, rewarding it with lots of good trade deals.
 
Brexit -- you know it makes sense

Not to me it doesn't.

Sure there's an attraction to the fantasy being put forward by the "Out" campaign, that the UK will retain all her benefits of EU membership but, unlike other countries, will not have to make nay financial contribution or have to conform with EU regulations, but that's cloud cuckoo land.

IMO Brexit makes no sense but then again I'm dependent on doing business with the EU for a living, I'm in favour of the free movement of people (being the son of, and married to immigrants) and I think that EU "meddling" in UK laws has actually been to our benefit.
 
Of course, maybe international politics will suddenly change and become based upon goodwill and friendship rather than the current way of working and the brexit will make china and the rest of the world admire the plucky little nation, rewarding it with lots of good trade deals.
Maybe not. In the days when China was weak and the UK dominated world trade, the "trade deal" the UK gave China was the Unequal Treaties and the Opium Wars. I hope they don't repay in kind.
 
The EU has never done anything for single mothers. The trouble is neither have the Brexit people who only seem interested in cutting spending on vital services like public conveniences and libraries.
 
If I was thinking of supporting Brexit for rational reasons, Henri McPhee's posts would make me reconsider whether I was missing something.
 
The EU has never done anything for single mothers. The trouble is neither have the Brexit people who only seem interested in cutting spending on vital services like public conveniences and libraries.

Another example of complete lack of facts. There have been tens of thousands of UK European Social Fund Projects (ESF) and European Regional Development Fund Projects over the period of 1980 -2014 with free childcare and education to help women do everything from setting up their own businesses, providing business grants to women, helping women enter various job markets covering everything from Construction to Horticulture. But really nothing very much at all. And there is planned for in the period 2014-2020, the ESF and European Regional Development Fund are investing around €11.8 billion across the UK to be spent on small business, long term unemployed, young people and women. If you want to read more here is the link http://ec.europa.eu/esf/main.jsp?catId=381 However if the Brexit camp have their way these projects and all the jobs of people running these projects will all be lost.
 
Last edited:
Economics is not built on a scientific rock, and neither is gangster government. Mediocre business leadership is OK if there are first class products. What is needed is leadership, which seems to be a very rare commodity. That woman was right when she said Cameron is too rich to be concerned about immigration, and the same goes for housing problems, and the loss of staff in the Coast Guard Service.

Economics is not built on scientific rock but it's more rigorous than saying "I feel this therefore it's true and everyone who disagrees is paid up EU shills" like the leave campaign has resorted to. By the way there are economic arguments that output could be higher in a Brexit world than a Remain world but these are generally based on slashing regulation, labour protection and tariffs and the Leave campaign have been somewhat silent on these strangely enough.

Also "Mediocre business leadership is OK if there are first class products" isn't supported by any reading of British economic history, although "Mediocre business leadership is OK if there are no significant competitors" is.
 
It seems that the argument seems to be coming down to immigration. It seems that it's more important to be able to exclude immigrants than it is to have a vibrant economy for them (and us) to work in :mad:

The immigration angle doesn't hold up very well. Not very well at all
picture.php


Sorry to sink the racists/xenophobes boat, with the facts!

Data from here
 
If I was thinking of supporting Brexit for rational reasons, Henri McPhee's posts would make me reconsider whether I was missing something.

Or indeed Malbec, who seems to think that the NAZIs were part of a Jewish conspiracy, and who also claims that there are many aliens with faster than light transportation.
 
Not to me it doesn't.

Sure there's an attraction to the fantasy being put forward by the "Out" campaign, that the UK will retain all her benefits of EU membership but, unlike other countries, will not have to make nay financial contribution or have to conform with EU regulations, but that's cloud cuckoo land.

IMO Brexit makes no sense but then again I'm dependent on doing business with the EU for a living, I'm in favour of the free movement of people (being the son of, and married to immigrants) and I think that EU "meddling" in UK laws has actually been to our benefit.

Which simply shows that two people can find opposite conclusions from what should be the same data set . In my case , it is view formed decades ago and now regarded as a necessity rather than a preference .
As I separately believe the EU is close to tumbling over the financial edge , and probably later this year , the result is personally largely academic . The talk will soon be about life belts and rafts .
However that did not stop my postal vote putting us into an early lead . If only for a brief second .
 

Back
Top Bottom