Evidently by your own assertion below it is. The problem with, and empowerment of, fantasy is that it need not be consistent. Reality has no such luxury that we can find.
It is also interacting with space by “consuming” it, by your own assertion. Again you can’t get any more connected or "integrated” than that.
Again, not by your assertion of “space consuming particles (mass particles)”
The connection I wrote about and write here about is the “space consuming” that you now call “space absorbing”.
"space absorbing" is neither a "weak" nor 'indirect' connection. It's about as strong and direct and integrating as any connection can get.
While you may (for whatever reason) want your “tension in the elastic property of space” to be weak and indirect that in no way makes consumption and/or absorption weak (as far as connections go) or any less integrating and direct.
The connection of your “space absorbing” / “space consuming particles” is the explicit absorption/consumption. That you apparently whish to pawn that connection off to your “elastic connection” simply demonstrates that even you don’t agree with your own assertions.
For your own edification EM waves (photons) are also absorbed by particles that couple to the electromagnetic force, like say the electron.
As space-time has electromagnetic properties and is the media by which electromagnetic waves travel through, your “space absorbing property of a mass-particle” would also absorb those EM waves with the space.
I don’t recall ever mentioning your “spin interaction”, so just one fantasy property at a time if you please. In this case your “space consuming”/”space absorbing property of a mass-particle”
“A fully integrated “EM-particle”, “pulsating elastic space” you say? So your “space consuming”/”space absorbing property of a mass-particle” would also absorb them since you just defined them as a form of “space”
Evidently nothing in your notions sounds reasonable even just to you. Obviously you just don’t understand or simply don’t agree with what you are asserting.
What happens when something is “consuming”/”absorbing” that ocean?
Oh and for the fifth time now, how do you define “north”?
Ok, let me tell you in a different way, the cause of the interaction between a up and down spinning particle...
The tension on space a particle exerts must also be released, – so after spinning / absorbing space, the particle is forced to release the tension on space again
As result, so soon one particle releases space tension, another particle immediately uses such released tension for the opposite action (to contract / stretch space) because such cooperation saves energy. This forces particles to interact with each other. it is all a process of push and pull.
The
strong nuclear force is due to the interaction ( pull / push process), - a much weaker connection is gravity, which is caused by the absorption / consumption af space, - whereby particles converts Space to matter in the interaction process..
In one and the same process you have both a weak and strong "connection". In this context we speak about the weakest force > gravity, which is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 weaker than the strong force.
You dont need to speculate so much about it because we know the proportionals and therefore also how strong the force of gravity really is.
I mean there are no secret here, in the end of the day gravity is about how strong a particle is connected to (the elastic) space and through that to competing space absorbing particles.
My point of view is that there is absolutely no evidence that a particle follows the curvature of space, - its even not logical simply because these have such weak connection to space.
What is the strongest evidence that EM waves really follows the curvature of space?
!
!
