Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
16.5 said:
Gee why am i surprised that Hillary's supporters have ignored this bombshell proof?

:thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
Click to expand...
As this is not proof of your claim of Clinton/her campaign/PAC/or anyone else paying operatives to post on this forum, why should anyone care?
 
BobTheCoward said:
Good find. It still doesn't say they are failing to attribute on forums, but I'm fine calling it a solid inference. Facts are our friends.
Click to expand...

It's also from 2 months before they "announced plans to spend $1 million to build a “digital task force” dedicated to “pushing out positive content to Hillary supporters online to counter negative attacks and false narratives.”"
 
State Department Can’t Find Emails of Hillary Clinton Server Staffer

The State Department has been unable to locate critical email records of the State Department information technology staffer who set up former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton‘s private email server, according to a court filing.

State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau confirmed that the department has not located the digital backup file for emails sent to or from Bryan Pagliano during Mrs. Clinton’s time in office. Mr. Pagliano was the State Department staffer who helped set up the home server that Mrs. Clinton used to conduct government business.

Mr. Pagliano has emerged as a key figure in the controversy over Mrs. Clinton’s exclusive use of a personal email server, an issue that has roiled her campaign after it was brought to light last year. He has been granted immunity by the Department of Justice as part of the investigation but has refused to testify in front of Congress, invoking his constitutional right against self-incrimination.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/...ind-emails-of-hillary-clinton-server-staffer/
Click to expand...


Reminiscent of the 18.5 minute gap in the infamous Nixon White House tapes.

"It is almost always the cover-up rather than the event that causes trouble." -- Senator Howard Baker circa 1973

And another famous quote attributed to Senator Baker: "What did the President know and when did he know it?"
 
Last edited:
Wealthy Cruz Donor Pours Millions Into Clinton Campaign

Renaissance Technologies, a hedge fund founded by billionaire James Simons, donated over $13 million to Sen. Ted Cruz’s failed presidential campaign. For a guy who’s supposed to be pretty smart with his money, the ROI [return on investment] on that one has got to sting. Nevertheless, now that Mr. Cruz is out of the race, Mr. Simons has begun pouring millions of dollars into Hillary Clinton‘s campaign.

Mr. Simons isn’t the only wealthy donor making the move. A number of deep-pocketed elite have given up trying to buy off Republican politicians in order to support Ms. Clinton—the only establishment-friendly candidate of either party remaining in the race. In response, the Clinton campaign has assembled a group dubbed “Republicans for Hillary” to reach wealthy GOP donors. Ms Clinton not only shares over 60 of the same donors with the former Republican candidate Jeb Bush but is also making new efforts to court additional Bush family donors, according to a recent Politico report.

Ms. Wasserman Schultz and the majority of the Democratic Party have made it apparent that their support for Hillary Clinton and her vast array of corporate and wealthy donors takes precedence over the concerns of constituents and the thousands of disenfranchised voters Bernie Sanders has reincorporated into American democracy.

http://observer.com/2016/05/wealthy-cruz-donor-pours-millions-into-clinton-campaign/
Click to expand...


If I'm not mistaken, Ted Cruz and Hillary Clinton hold diametrically opposed ideologies. However, they do happen to share one common trait -- they both have greasy palms.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Ms. Clinton—the only establishment-friendly candidate of either party remaining in the race.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. All the candidates were 'establishment-friendly'. Not a single one ran as an independent. Sanders even became a democrat just so he could take advantage of their money and power. And Trump must be 'establishment-friendly' because he is part of 'the establishment'.

No matter which candidate become president, you can bet that they will be 'establishment-friendly', because only an anarchist or a fool would do otherwise.
 
Bob001 said:
A short guide to some of the women in Bill's life. I suspect we'll be hearing about them a lot during the campaign.
http://www.salon.com/2016/05/10/the...onald_trump_wont_stop_taunting_hillary_about/
Click to expand...


"Now that the stories are resurfacing, they could hamper Mrs. Clinton’s attempts to connect with younger women, who are learning the details of the Clintons’ history for the first time. Several news organizations have published guides to the Clinton scandals to explain the allegations to a new generation of readers.

"The resurfacing of the scandals of the 1990s has brought about a rethinking among some feminists about how prominent women stood by Mr. Clinton and disparaged his accusers after the “bimbo eruptions,” as a close aide to the Clintons, Betsey Wright, famously called the claims of affairs and sexual assault against Mr. Clinton in his 1992 campaign."

Read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/u...illary-clintons-strength-with-women.html?_r=0

Today's young women are repulsed by Crooked Hillary and her sleazy husband, and are overwhelmingly supporting Bernie Sanders.
 
Last edited:
It's amusing that Hillary supporters like Skeptic Ginger point to Hillary's sordid past as some sort of strength. Like she's been battle-tested, and all of the skeletons in the closet have already been uncovered.

The problem with this reasoning is that most voters today don't really know or understand or remember the details about Hillary's past behavior. Some of the skeletons were uncovered, but they have since been buried under both the lies of her supporters and the passage of time.

Digging up those skeletons again will shock the consciences of many people who would otherwise be open to voting for her. And Trump not only has a team of people with shovels, he seems willing to drag those skeletons before the cameras and gnaw on their bones.
 
sunmaster14 said:
It's amusing that Hillary supporters like Skeptic Ginger point to Hillary's sordid past as some sort of strength. Like she's been battle-tested, and all of the skeletons in the closet have already been uncovered.

The problem with this reasoning is that most voters today don't really know or understand or remember the details about Hillary's past behavior. Some of the skeletons were uncovered, but they have since been buried under both the lies of her supporters and the passage of time.

Digging up those skeletons again will shock the consciences of many people who would otherwise be open to voting for her. And Trump not only has a team of people with shovels, he seems willing to drag those skeletons before the cameras and gnaw on their bones.
Click to expand...


The vast right-wing conspiracy is busy... ;)

MSNBC said:
CANNES, France — A massive police force will be guarding the Cannes Film Festival this year. But the only scuffle on the horizon may come in response to the right-wing producers of a devastating new documentary about Bill and Hillary Clinton’s alleged influence peddling and favor-trading. That film, “Clinton Cash,” screens here May 16 and opens in the U.S. on July 24 — just before the Democratic National Convention. [...]
Click to expand...
 
jhunter1163 said:
"Clinton Cash"? Really? Haven't we been through that? Why, yes, we have:

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/04...ts-author-admits-evidence-clinton-crimes.html
Click to expand...

Oh, PoliticusUSA, nice!

By the way, didn't Stephanopoulos have to apologize for that nonsense interview? Oh yeah, he did, he did:

In 2012, 2013 and 2014, Stephanopoulos made $25,000 donations to the 501 nonprofit founded by former President Bill Clinton, the foundation's records show. Stephanopoulos never disclosed this information to viewers, even when interviewing author Peter Schweizer last month about his book "Clinton Cash," which alleges that donations to the foundation may have influenced some of Hillary Clinton's actions as secretary of state.
Click to expand...

LOLZ! Talk about getting hoisted by one's own petard. Typical Clinton Crony sleaziness.

GREAT LINK JHUNTER!!! :thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
 
16.5 said:
Oh, PoliticusUSA, nice!

By the way, didn't Stephanopoulos have to apologize for that nonsense interview? Oh yeah, he did, he did:



LOLZ! Talk about getting hoisted by one's own petard. Typical Clinton Crony sleaziness.

GREAT LINK JHUNTER!!! :thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Your slip is showing again, Mr. neo-socialist. Don't us socialists avoid citing and supporting Breitbart-funded films? How many revisions has he done due to the poor reporting in the original?

Or is this just another in the many instances of "fling enough **** and some of it should stick".
 
Foolmewunz said:
Your slip is showing again, Mr. neo-socialist. Don't us socialists avoid citing and supporting Breitbart-funded films? How many revisions has he done due to the poor reporting in the original?

Or is this just another in the many instances of "fling enough **** and some of it should stick".
Click to expand...

Your post makes no sense. All I did was destroy jhunter's post reliance on a universally discredited interview conducted by Clinton stooge Stephanopolous. I claim no familiarity with the film.

By the way, badly written sarcasm, like yours, is worse than no response at all.
 
Well, there's this one, where the publisher had to correct seven or eight incorrect passages:

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...er-corrects-7-or-8-inaccurate-passages-117946

And this one, listing over 20 errors, fabrications and distortions:

http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/04/30/twenty-plus-errors-fabrications-and-distortions/203480

And this one:

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book

I could go on, there's plenty more, but Schweizer is clearly a partisan hack. Clearly, that is, to everyone except HDS sufferers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom