If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

Redwood said:
It's all in NCSTAR 1-9, FF! Table 5-3. It actually adds to 16.5 seconds.

YOU HAVEN'T READ THE REPORTS, HAVE YOU, FF? How do expect to hope to refute NIST with anyone from Pete and Patty in Peoria, to the world's scientists and engineers, when you haven't even read the reports you're trying to refute? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Most likely he hasn't read them. :nstead he relies on what parsed bits and pieces he gets from truther websites.
 
jaydeehess said:
Most likely he hasn't read them. :nstead he relies on what parsed bits and pieces he gets from truther websites.
Click to expand...
Reading and understanding are two different things. The NIST reports were not written for laymen. I doubt they will ever release a YouTube version....... ;)
 
Redwood said:
It's all in NCSTAR 1-9, FF! Table 5-3. It actually adds to 16.5 seconds.

YOU HAVEN'T READ THE REPORTS, HAVE YOU, FF? How do expect to hope to refute NIST with anyone from Pete and Patty in Peoria, to the world's scientists and engineers, when you haven't even read the reports you're trying to refute? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I think junior ran into the wall of stupid when he saw this post. He can't defend it so now *poof* he's gone.

LOL
 
Oystein said:
I believe this is untrue. There are a few changes to personal information all the time, and occasionally a signature is removed. The best explanation I have for this is that AE911T makes changes as signers demand them.
Click to expand...

Scholars for truth vs, AE/911 truth, petitions easy to get them confused they are separate.
 
DGM said:
Reading and understanding are two different things. The NIST reports were not written for laymen. I doubt they will ever release a YouTube version....... ;)
Click to expand...

There are two choices then, either he read it and is deliberately parsing comments, passages that he thinks he understands, or he didn't read it at all and is simply reiterating truther site parsed misunderstandings of the reports.

ETA: of course the third option is troll.
 
jaydeehess said:
The NIST engineers and technicians are experts too. Try again, why does it only count for AE911T signatories?
Click to expand...

He is using the same worthless appeal to Authority, that Truthers have always used and always been wrong, expert opinion is only valid if the expert is correct.
If an experiment goes against Logic, Reason, The known Laws of physics, and it must be over simplified to reach a conclusion that is predetermined by the energy value.
Give the experimenter a nice new white Jacket, with sleaves in the back, and a nice rubber padded room so he will not be a danger to himself or others while, what ever is causing his mental disorder is being diagnosed and treated.:D
 
tfk said:
LOL away.
Strutting & LOLing appear to be the only things for which you have any talent.
Click to expand...
futurama-fry-should-i-lol-or-roflmao.jpg
 
Redwood said:
YOU HAVEN'T READ THE REPORTS, HAVE YOU, FF? How do expect to hope to refute NIST with anyone from Pete and Patty in Peoria, to the world's scientists and engineers, when you haven't even read the reports you're trying to refute? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I haven't read it because I'm not really that into the fiction and fantasy genres.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom